But, Giz! They've gotta pay for their networks! Because you know, you guys are dataing out their invisio-tubes that they broadcast! So they have to charge moAR and moar. Otherwise, how are they ever gunna get their 4Gs?
Seriously, though. Either all the telecoms are dying for cash and about to all go bankrupt because they're "just giving their network use away", or the upcoming FCC investigation is gonna be the best thing for consumers since internet without screwing with the phone line.
That is, so long as they pay attention to more than just getting an iPhone on Verizon, dangit. I can't tell you how low on the list that is for dumb, anti-consumer practices.
They started doing this once they got the Nokia E71x.
I'd rather pay the extra coin, one time up front for an unlocked phone and pay $15 a month instead of $30. Saving $180 a year may not seem like a huge amount in the grand scheme of things but it's $180 less than those bloodsuckers at AT&T get from me..
I don't mind having to have a data plan so much (I do use it), but what gets me is texting being extra. How can they even have the gall to advertise "unlimited data" but then charge extra for texting? What the hell is text but data? They really should be sued for false advertising - you can't advertise unlimited data and then charge extra depending on the kind of data it is. What's next, "unlimited data" except for web browsing?
@badasscat: that's because texting does not run on the same frequencies as data. I.E.- AT&T devices usually have 4 bands, GSM GPRS EDGE AND 3G. Data flows through the latter and voice+text "pings" flow through GSM and GPRS. Ever wonder why there's only 160 characters to a text? look it up.
@Funktionality: Texts use an unused part of a control channel. It's data in the margins that gets sent whether or not there's a text in there. It costs the carrier nothing to transfer texts.
@Funktionality: It really doesn't matter. That would be like AT&T charging differently for voice calls depending on whether or not you're on the 2G, 3G or HSDPA network. It would be ridiculous. Data is data, and if you say $30 for "unlimited data", then I don't see how you charge extra for certain kinds of data and not others.
Yes I know, your next argument is that on a digital network, voice is data too so why not just include everything in one flat rate? My answer to that is first of all, yes, why not? Why should we have to pay different charges for different things if it's all data?
But secondly, I am talking about consumer-facing marketing here that's deceptive. I am not talking about semantic meaning. I'm talking about intentionally baiting and switching by advertising something as "unlimited" when it's not. It's no different than when the cable companies advertise "unlimited" downloads but then don't tell you about the bandwidth caps.
It's all about greed, now they can make twice as much per month on certain people. Unlocked smartphone + wifi + prepaid = ATT/T-Mobile's hand not up my ass. This is the only way to go if you don't want someone controlling what you do with your smartphone. Some compromises of course but them the breaks.
Many carriers already require a data plan with Smartphone purchase, including the carrier I work for. Our customers hate it but I'm just a peon and have to take the abuse while the CEO plays golf...
@Wintursoul: Most of the AT&T upgrades already require you to get it (well, they get really pushy until you take the free trial) but you can immediately cancel that feature. As long as they don't require you to keep it, no biggie.
wow that's ridiculous.
that actually seriously would make me switch to T-mobile in it of itself...I don't need the data plan. I am either at home, at work, or at school 80% of the time and there is wifi...that's absolutely horse poo
I bet they will take that away
@ThisIsSharksTerritory: I think T-Mobile requires a data plan with all their smartphones too. I went in to buy a G-1 and they told me that a data plan was required.
@Δεν βρέθηκαν λέξεις: I could understand with G-1...it's the T-mobile's iPhone but they really require it with all their smartphones?
I didn't know that
@Shawn Pero: For the PDA features. Active Sync to my desktop (Google Sync if you prefer). Wi-fi for when I'm bored. 3G isn't *THAT* useful when you live in a wired town (Wi-Fi is faster).
@Δεν βρέθηκαν λέξεις: That's Bullshit. I had my G1 for six months without a data plan and it worked wonderful cause I had WiFi at home and work (90% of my life). I only added it cause I went on a trip to Seattle and wanted 3g connection when I was there.
@Δεν βρέθηκαν λέξεις: T-Mobile does NOT require a data plan. I took my iPhone to their kiosk in the mall and they set me up quickly. I got a Flex plan and pay only 1/3 of the fraction BS&T wanted.
If you don't want data, you shouldn't be getting a smart phone.
Oh, and Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile do this as well. T-Mobile's policy is "Anything with a full keyboard gets a data plan". That means even messaging phones get data, even though the primary use is texting.
Primary use on a smart phone? Data.
Although, if more people get AT&T's data plan, they're just going to realize how much it sucks...
@MacAttack7388: Not all of us need to be "connected" 24/7. I have been using smartphones for a while and I have never used a data plan, I have used Wifi exclusively and I get by fine.
@Δεν βρέθηκαν λέξεις:
Well, to be honest, it's also for the people who don't get data, use it a ton, and then bitch to AT&T that they've been charged $1000 on their bill for data.
@vgrfx: I worked for AT&T...thats now how they work...basically anyway they can make more money from the customer they will...im suprised it has taken this long really..
Alot of companies try to make more money from their customers, but I think AT&T is the worst...
@sweetzombiejesus: So, if my teenager has a smart phone for easy texting and we told AT&T to block all data and don't give us a data plan, on September 6th said teenager will start getting data and I will start getting charged $20 more a month?
@reddingofish: yeah, more than likely you will get a notice (if your lucky) and really the only way out of it would be to cancel your service or talk to a decent customer service manager who has the authority to give to credit towards each statement to remove the pricing (the supervisor will say they dont have that authority, but they do...just most of them wont do it and then notate the account to tell other supervisors not to give in) basically just be a nice person and tell them how you cant afford it and how your kid will be upset about not having a smartphone..basically a sob story, and they will probably credit you till the remainder of the contract...
08/31/09
Seriously, though. Either all the telecoms are dying for cash and about to all go bankrupt because they're "just giving their network use away", or the upcoming FCC investigation is gonna be the best thing for consumers since internet without screwing with the phone line.
That is, so long as they pay attention to more than just getting an iPhone on Verizon, dangit. I can't tell you how low on the list that is for dumb, anti-consumer practices.
08/31/09
08/31/09
08/22/09
I'd rather pay the extra coin, one time up front for an unlocked phone and pay $15 a month instead of $30. Saving $180 a year may not seem like a huge amount in the grand scheme of things but it's $180 less than those bloodsuckers at AT&T get from me..
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
Well $40 extra a month for a shitty browser that is unproductive and mobile internet just wasn't worth more than the internet I pay in my apt.
Forcing it on customers must make all smartphones better at the things you would use data for, or this is just wrong.
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
Yes I know, your next argument is that on a digital network, voice is data too so why not just include everything in one flat rate? My answer to that is first of all, yes, why not? Why should we have to pay different charges for different things if it's all data?
But secondly, I am talking about consumer-facing marketing here that's deceptive. I am not talking about semantic meaning. I'm talking about intentionally baiting and switching by advertising something as "unlimited" when it's not. It's no different than when the cable companies advertise "unlimited" downloads but then don't tell you about the bandwidth caps.
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
that actually seriously would make me switch to T-mobile in it of itself...I don't need the data plan. I am either at home, at work, or at school 80% of the time and there is wifi...that's absolutely horse poo
I bet they will take that away
08/21/09
08/21/09
I didn't know that
08/21/09
The G1 is different. Android won't work without a data plan. My wife has a WinMo phone on T-mobile though and no data plan.
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
Steps 2 and 3 are ???? and profit, respectively.
08/21/09
Oh, and Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile do this as well. T-Mobile's policy is "Anything with a full keyboard gets a data plan". That means even messaging phones get data, even though the primary use is texting.
Primary use on a smart phone? Data.
Although, if more people get AT&T's data plan, they're just going to realize how much it sucks...
08/21/09
08/21/09
Well, to be honest, it's also for the people who don't get data, use it a ton, and then bitch to AT&T that they've been charged $1000 on their bill for data.
08/21/09
08/21/09
Alot of companies try to make more money from their customers, but I think AT&T is the worst...
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
08/21/09
11/21/08