<![CDATA[Gizmodo: David Pogue]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: David Pogue]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/david pogue http://gizmodo.com/tag/david pogue <![CDATA[ Gizmodo's iPhone 3G Review Matrix ]]> How do you read three lengthy reviews at the same time, really really fast? You jump to our review matrix of the iPhone 3G, first judged exclusively by the Three Amigos of Appledom: Ed Baig of USA Today, Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal and David Pogue of the New York Times.

If you need more gritty and less nitty, check out Chen's rundown of the reviews. Or, if you have some spare time, read the Three Amigos' own unexpurgated scribblings. [USA Today, WSJ/AllThingsD, NYT]

]]>
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:00:00 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023195&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ iPhone 3G Reviews Are In ]]> The first iPhone 3G reviews have just hit, from Walt Mossberg of the WSJ and All Things D, Ed Baig from USA Today and David Pogue from the NYTimes. No one goes deep into the app store but here's what they think:

Walt Mossberg of the WSJ has been testing it "for a couple of weeks" and sees that surfing on the faster 3G is between three and five times the speed of the original iPhone. However, Moss found that browsing on the 3G network drained his battery much faster than browsing on the original. Externally, he says the speaker was "much louder" (YES!) for both music and speakerphone, but otherwise pretty much the same as the original. One bug/feature he ran into was that you can only sync your calendar and contacts with either Exchange or your personal accounts, not both.

In Mossberg's own battery tests, he got 4 hours and 27 minutes (short of 5 hours) of talk time, which is three hours less than his test on the original iPhone. Using 3G, he got 5 hours and 49 minutes, which is slightly better than Apple's own claim. He couldn't test any apps on his iPhone 3G, but did on his old iPhone—they worked pretty much as advertised. He concludes with pretty much what we've all known: it's slightly more expensive on AT&T due to the higher price plan, but satisfies people who really need that 3G speed. What's weird is that Mossberg didn't test the GPS functionality at all, so we're left wondering how that is. [All Things D]

Ed Baig of USA Today also tested the iPhone 3G and claims both that it was worth the wait, but still not perfect. His complaints of the first one—no video capture, no Bluetooth stereo and no voice dialing—are still there. Also, AT&T's 3G coverage was nonexistent in his New Jersey home, which kinda negates the whole "iPhone 3G" thing. He notes that the new plastic backing helps reception, and the new flush headphone jack is "a welcome development." Unlike Mossberg, Baig does have something to note on the GPS. He says he was quite impressed by its accuracy when searching for pizza places while driving, and hopes that there will be a third-party add-on for turn-by-turn live directions.

Baig also says that the speaker is improved, but notes strangely that you can't directly charge the new iPhone 3G in some old accessories, such as a Bose SoundDock or a Belkin car kit. There's actually an adapter coming that will enable charging on those. Weird. He finishes up with his wishes for the next generation: Flash, Java and WMV support, removable battery and an expandable memory slot. All in all, a pretty positive review. [USA Today]

David Pogue of the NYT says that the audio quality is much improved, and notes that both incoming and outgoing sound is better than before. "In fact, few cellphones sound this good." The curved back makes the phone feel better in your hand, which is a definite plus. However, he says, the missing "standard cellphone features" from the first generation are also missing from this one. He hopes that the third-party Apps from the iPhone App Store will help fill in the gaps, but some of the ones we've seen—finding parking spots, free phone calls at Wi-Fi hotspots, random restaurant recommender, expense tracker, Etch-a-Sketch and tip calculator—don't exactly make up for the missing MMS, video recording and cut and paste features. Pogue also noticed the GPS does not support turn-by-turn navigation.

Pogue doesn't have much else in the way of benchmarks or impressions, but comes off seeming like he really likes the phone because of the iPhone 2.0 software; something old iPhone owners will be able to get for free. [NYT]

Notes: We have to say that Mossberg's review was the best in terms of completeness (save for the GPS omission). Normally, Newsweek would have a review up for the iPhone along with these three guys, but both they and Wired don't have an early review. This, we think, is because Steven Levy (the old Newsweek guy) at Wired, and Fake Steve Jobs (who hasn't quite started at Newsweek) didn't get the nod from Apple. We had our own hands on with the phone back at WWDC, which covers a lot of the exterior hardware elements as well as some of the software details.

]]>
Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:13:06 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023168&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYTimes: Pogue's Livescribe Pulse Smartpen Video ]]> David Pogue has a quick video review of Livescribe's Pulse Smartpen that does a very good job of illustrating the concept. Worth watching on top of our own review. [Pogue's Livescribe Pulse Smartpen Video review]

]]>
Sun, 11 May 2008 14:44:46 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389331&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Our MacBook Air Review Matrix ]]>
The so-called "four horsemen" of Apple product reviews have weighed in on the near weightless MacBook Air. You may have seen our post on it last night. You may have even caught one or two of the reviews. But only now can you sit back and enjoy the best quotes from all four reviews in a handy easy-to-read review matrix from your friends at Gizmodo.

MacBook_Air_Review_Matrix.jpgWhile most of the additional material covered in the reviews is basically factual stuff that you've already been agonizing over for a week or more, they're all decent reads if you have the time.

• Pogue's preview-review from 1/17 New York Times

• Ed Baig's story in USA Today

• Steven Levy's piece from Newsweek's website

• Walt Mossberg's review from Wall Street Journal and allthingd.com

Of course, if you don't have the time for those, pop over to Chen's superfast big-shot review summary and then, well, get about your business. [All About MacBook Air]

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:00:06 EST Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348361&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Where Is David Pogue's MacBook Air Review? ]]> Pogue_w_Flowers.jpgWednesday night around this time, we like to check in with our favorite columnists. Tonight we expected MacBook Air reviews from Walt Mossberg at WSJ, Ed Baig at USA Today, Steven Levy at Newsweek and of course, David Pogue at the venerable New York Times. Only, when I refreshed my browser at 9pm, Pogue's Jan. 24 State of the Art column turned out to cover Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac and MacSpeech Dictate, rather than the far sexier (and more controversial) MacBook Air. UPDATE: Pogue scoops the other A-Team members by reviewing the Macbook Air on the Macworld show floor. His response in the comments. [First MacBook Air Reviews]

]]>
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:08:21 EST Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348310&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ More Sling Player Upgrades Coming ]]> Pogue reviews the Slingbox Solo, but the news is that the Sling Client is getting an upgrade in the shape of local pause and rewind controls. That's cool because you don't have to deal with the stream delay while trying to rewind or pause the TiVo back home remotely.

The upgrade, due in a month, will also have the clip and post functionality that lets you share clips with friends online, which we heard about at CES. And Pogue's post confirms an iPhone client is coming, which we first heard about in an off hand remark by Om interview with CEO Blake Krikorian before an SDK was ever acknowledged by The steve. Sling rep and TiVo blogger Dave Zatz offered up these words when we sought confirmation: "We're actively researching the iphone platform, and are eagerly awaiting the SDK."

What I wonder is if Sling is WMV-based, and the iPhone streams H.264 natively, does this mean Sling'll start broadcasting in H.264? Or is Sling going to make a WM client for the iPhone? Either way, it's going to be a long stream home on that EDGE connection.

]]>
Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:29:18 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317893&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue Reviews the OLPC ]]>
David Pogue is right about the OLPC in his NYTimes column this week. For those of you who haven't kept up with the changes in the One Laptop Per Child he sums it up nicely, demoing all the engineering miracles in the machine, addressing the low minded complaints of "snarky bloggers" (Where?!), going on to explain why it's an interesting and important thing for the developing world. The video does a great job, so I'll recommend you watch the video above. It definitely convinced me: Even more so than water or malaria shots or food, kids in third world countries need this PC. (David, I'm kidding. Nice column this week.) [NYTimes]

]]>
Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:11:39 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307829&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue and Woz in the Geeks on Board Cruise Documentary DVD ]]> Director Abe Greenwald just released his documentary of what goes on during Geeks on Board cruises, featuring Woz and David Pogue, among others. This is a trailer. Best part is when they go ashore to some exotic local and everyone lays on the beach far from the water, with laptops in tow. Gotta be hard to see the screens under those conditions, eh? [Amazon]

]]>
Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:31:03 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301667&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue Sees Eye-to-Eye With Vudu Video-on-Demand Box (Verdict: Mostly Great) ]]> Pushing out his review a bit before the official embargo lifted last night, our favorite Times wonder-reporter put the video store in a box, Vudu, through its paces and walked away mostly happy with the experience. Brownie points for: picture quality, slick five-button remote, pay-per-flick, and truly instant viewing. Buts:

You need a speedy broadband connection (at least 3Mbps); fast-forward can be wonky; like every other distributor the scope and selection its ever-changing catalog of 5k flicks is at the mercy of Hollywood studios. Stay tuned for own review, but if you're feeling hasty you can go ahead and slap down your $399 now. [NYT]

]]>
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:00:04 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297057&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ David Pogue reviews macro software that'll ... ]]> David Pogue reviews macro software that'll speed up your computer usage; he ends up with a list of 5 for the Mac and PC you might find useful. [NYT]

]]>
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:46:18 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292937&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue Reviews Waterproof Cams, Sanyo Xacti E1 Floats Above the Competition ]]> Pogue takes a a few waterproof cams down to the local waterpark for testing and finds Sanyo's 6MP Xacti E1 to be of better image and video quality than the rest. I've always found the Xacti cam's nice, but the low light performance to be lacking. That doesn't matter when you're talking about beach and pool time, however. I believe its image quality is better than the other cams in this roundup, but it's only rated to 5 feet of depth.

He also tests two traditionally shaped 7MP cameras, the Optio W30 ($237) and Olympus's Stylus 770 SW ($270). The Olympus is a fully rugged setup, shock and extreme temperature resistant, good down to 33 feet of water; the Pentax is good for 10 feet at two hours. I've used the previous generation Pentax and loved it for hawaii conditions. But I did lose it on a reef and only then did I learn what Pogue points out: None of these damn things float. [NYTimes]

]]>
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:02:06 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281580&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ iPhone Applecare <del>$80</del>$69 For an Extra Year, Says Pogue [UPDATED: Confirmed] ]]> applecare.jpg[UPDATED: Confirmed at $69.] Applecare is supposed to be available for the iPhone this month, and the price may be $80. Joel Johnson, walker-of-Gizmodo-halls-of-lore, noticed this statement in Pogue's Missing Manual PDF, on page 277: "The iPhone comes with a one-year warranty. If you buy an Applecare contract ($80) you're covered for a second year. If, during the coverage period, anything goes wrong that's not your fault, Apple will fix it for free." Apple neither confirms or denies this price, but The NYTimes tech columnist is pretty damn good as far as sources go. [UPDATE: Nope, this wasn't a final copy of the book, so it will have to be corrected at $69.][iPhone Missing Manual via JJ's Dethroner]

]]>
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:17:37 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280368&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Nobody Picks on Pogue But Me ]]> OMG, the internet is beating up Pogue for his iPhone video. We like picking on the guy, even when we're praising the authoritative, yet mainstream-accessible NYTimes gadget columnist. (See our photoshop contest entitled "Make David Pogue Cool".) And we've had our share of blog fights with the guy. But when I see the Huff Po, Valleywag, and others take shots at him without understanding how annoying it was for a gadget journalist to actually have to make a fair verdict of the iPhone amidst the buzz and anti-buzz, well, it doesn't seem right. I mean, just because you hate your job doesn't mean the rest of us have to. It's a phone, relax, people.

Maybe I'm just taking it personally, because it was a damn good idea. Oh, right, the iPhone music video was an idea we came up with together. I totally goaded him into it by telling him that its the thing that would set his work apart from Mossberg and the rest of the mainstream journalists. He was a former Broadway arranger, you know. There's no reason why he shouldn't flaunt that. If I could do every review on Gizmodo in musical form I would.

What is he supposed to do, hate it just because everyone is sick of hearing how awesome it is? Even the iPhone's hardest critics have to admit its amazing in some ways. (Have you seen our review?) Pogue just feels its worth crowing over, literally. His video still covers the flaws. He's just having a good time. It's gadgets. It's a phone. Relax Pogue critics. There's no nefarious plot to sell more books. There's just a guy who likes gadgets and did a music video about it.

]]>
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:40:09 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=280078&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Making of David Pogue's iPhone music ... ]]> The Making of David Pogue's iPhone music video, with Gizmodo shoutout. [NYTimes]

]]>
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:43:48 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=278001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Opinions Side-By-Side In Our iPhone Review Matrix ]]>
If you were too lazy to actually read the four iPhone reviews that came out last night, we've done the hard part and stuck the most salient tidbits into a chart, hoping to see both agreement and dissent among the elders: David Pogue of the New York Times, Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal, Ed Baig of USA Today and Steven Levy of Newsweek. (What happened to Lev Grossman at Time Magazine? He usually gets the Apple stuff early too.) Jump for our painstakingly created review matrix—it's fun to notice what words they all use, and when one totally disagrees with the rest.


The iPhone Matches Most of Its Hype [New York Times]

The iPhone is Breakthrough Handheld Computer [Wall Street Journal]

Apple's iPhone isn't perfect, but it's worthy of the hype [USA Today]

At Last, the iPhone: A first look [Newsweek]

]]>
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:03:14 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272727&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue's iPhone Video Review ]]>
This is why we love Pogue. He reviews it, goes meta, and gives Mossberg a poke. And btw, he hates AT&T's EDGE network. [NYT]

]]>
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:43:55 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272554&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breaking: Pogue Reviews the iPhone, Gives it 1.5 Thumbs Up ]]> David Pogue of the NYTimes got his iPhone review up (the first one by 3 minutes. Suck it, Mossberg!), oh boy! So what's he think of it? Well, he likes it. Sort of. He's taken with the design, but has some reservations overall.

First, he likes the design.

The phone is so sleek and thin, it makes Treos and BlackBerrys look obese.

And he doesn't mind the keyboard all that much either.

Two things make the job tolerable. First, some very smart software offers to complete words for you, and, when you tap the wrong letter, figures out what word you intended…Second, the instructional leaflet encourages you to "trust" the keyboard (or, as a product manager jokingly put it, to "use the Force").

It seems like Apple did things right. AT&T, on the other hand…

The bigger problem is the AT&T network. In a Consumer Reports study, AT&T's signal ranked either last or second to last in 19 out of 20 major cities. My tests in five states bear this out. If Verizon's slogan is, "Can you hear me now?" AT&T's should be, "I'm losing you."

But otherwise, you have to use AT&T's ancient EDGE cellular network, which is excruciatingly slow. The New York Times's home page takes 55 seconds to appear; Amazon.com, 100 seconds; Yahoo. two minutes. You almost ache for a dial-up modem.

Ouch. Well, there's always next generation for people who want to, well, use the Internet.

The iPhone Matches Most of Its Hype [NY Times]

]]>
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:12:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=272543&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Winners of the David Pogue Photoshop Contest ]]> Sorry for the delay on this, folks. We had to run the results through our computers here to make sure they were up to snuff, and you know that takes time. But we're finished, and without further ado, I present to you the three winners of the "Make David Pogue a Badass" Photoshop contest, each of which will be receiving an autographed copy of the Pogue book of their choice. Congrats to the winners, and thanks so much to everyone who participated! You're all winners in my eyes. Look for another Pshop contest in the coming weeks.

Up above is the entry by Nolan Haims, check the jump for the other two winners.

poguewinner2.jpgChris Cole
poguewinner3.jpgSimon Wong

]]>
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:17:27 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=270610&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue Finds the Best Reasonably-Priced Noise-Cancelling Headphones ]]> NY Times badass David Pogue took a look at noise-canceling headphones, looking for a pair that can match the quality of Bose's QuietComfort 3's without the ridiculously high price ($350[!!!). What he found were a bunch of pairs that did the job decently, and a couple that came close enough to the QuietComforts to make spending $350 an option only a real sucker would choose.

The two that he liked the best were the Panasonic RP-HC500s ($100) and the Audio-Techinica ATH-ANC7s ($132), saying that they cancelled surrounding noise out while also delivering top-notch sound quality. As anyone who's listened to headphones on a plane can tell you, the ability to shut out that engine noise makes your trip a whole lot sweeter. It's nice to see some quality choices for people other than the rich and the clueless.

Headphones to Shut Out the World [NY Times]

]]>
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:30:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=268952&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ David Pogue: Now a Badass, at Least in this Gallery ]]> Man, you guys love to Photoshop David Pogue. I received over 100 entries to my challenge to make the NY Times tech guru cool, and it was a lot of fun going through them all. Mr. Pogue himself offered to send autographed copies of whichever of his books the top 3 winners would like, so look for a post about determining a top 3 later on. Until then, here are the best 24 entries as judged by me in no particular order. Sure, I'm not an unbiased judge (both entries with my picture got in, not just because I'm in there but also because they're the most insane), but I'm all you people have got. I chose entries that were either technically amazing or funny with some effort shown, even if the skill wasn't all there.

Now, seriously, stop sending me Photoshops. I've seen enough Pogue in the last week to last me some time. It's not that you aren't adorable, Dave, but a man can only take so much.


]]>
Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:30:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265777&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Make David Pogue the Badass that he Deserves to Be ]]> pogueflowers.jpgWe love David Pogue here at Gizmodo. The NY Times tech guru is a playful geek whose love and passion for all things gadgety shines through with every over-the-top video he makes. He is not, however, the coolest guy in the world. Look, no disrespect, but you're no Justin Timberlake, David.

That's where you readers come in. Your challenge is this: make David Pogue as cool as humanly possible. Put him on a Harley with a stogie sticking out of his mouth. Surround him with buxom ladies in a hot tub. You know, cool. Find some pictures of him and use your Photoshop skills and send your best efforts to me at adam@gizmodo.com. Entries are due on Friday, and I'll post the best results early next week.

Oh, and a note:

Unlike the last Photoshop "contest" I ran, this one will be selective. That means I won't post everything that's sent in. So don't just stick some "witty" text over the photo and send it to me. I want sweet Photoshops here, people. Let's see what you've got. I don't have any prizes to give away at the moment, but who knows, if you inspire me enough maybe I'll dig something up to send to the winner. No promises.

UPDATE: Here are the images.

]]>
Tue, 29 May 2007 14:00:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264173&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue on Email For Dumb Phones ]]> Pogue's video tells us how to read our email on Dumb Phones. (You like that? That's my name for every handset not a Treo, Windows Mobile, or BlackBerry.)

He checks out GMail and Yahoo's apps, but faults them for being unavailable on many of the locked-down phones that carriers sell us. He much prefers the teleflip service, which forwards email messages from preselected senders as multiple txt messages.

I see where he's coming from, since most any phone capable of txt messages can work with teleflip, but man, I definitely don't want the flood of my inbox hitting my cellphone like a rain of twittter. Especially when each email gets broken down into 4-5 emails. *Shudder*

Hey, anyone catch his new show last Friday? He's got a schedule up.

How to Make Your Cellphone Act Like a BlackBerry [NYTimes]

]]>
Mon, 28 May 2007 18:18:38 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=263962&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ David Pogue's "Geek to Me" Show Airs Tonight ]]>
Set the TiVo! David Pogue's new show Science Channel show, which he writes and stars in, starts tonight.

8 pm on the Science Channel! Every Fri for 6 weeks. Also on Discovery HD starting June 7.

It's going to be like a 30 (60?) minute version of the funny videos we link to on the NYTimes every week. There's a video after the jump, with a mossberg-ish funk track for the video's opening soundtrack. I forgive David, because it has a snazzy snare drum threaded through it. (I hope he plays piano at some point during the season.)

Anyhow, here's a video preview worth watching:

THE SCIENCE CHANNEL'S NEW SERIES IT'S ALL GEEK TO ME ALLEVIATES CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY CONFUSION

Hosted by New York Times Columnist David Pogue,
Series Debuts Friday, May 18, 8 PM (ET/PT)

(Silver Spring, MD) - The Science Channel debuts IT'S ALL GEEK TO ME, a new weekly series that brings The New York Times personal-technology columnist David Pogue's expertise on the world of technology to television. In each half-hour episode, Pogue uses his unique brand of humor to help average consumers unravel the mystery behind complex electronic gadgets used in their daily lives. Whether it's choosing the right digital camera, unlocking fun tricks on your cell phone or learning how to edit your own home videos, Pogue's unique knowledge and expertise helps it all make sense. The series premieres Friday, May 18, at 8 PM (ET/PT) and will air every Friday on The Science Channel.

For years, David Pogue has enlightened readers about personal technology in The New York Times and as an Emmy award-winning correspondent for CBS News. Now his unique wisdom reveals the mysteries and special features and functions behind a variety of consumer technology products. Useful tips and tricks, interspersed with quirky sketches - including man-on-the-street segments - ensure that each episode of IT'S ALL GEEK TO ME entertains while informing.

CAMCORDERS
Camcorder sales may be down, but amateur video is way, way up, thanks to the camera phone, YouTube and other developments. David Pogue, The New York Times tech columnist, takes you on a fast, funny ride through the entire process of becoming a home-movie mogul: choosing a camcorder (tape vs. DVD vs. memory card), learning to use it, editing out the boring parts and finally posting the result on the Web for a potential audience of one billion people.

CELL PHONES
Cell phones have gotten less expensive, smaller and more powerful over time, but people still have a love-hate relationship with these little gadgets. David Pogue, The New York Times tech columnist, offers couples therapy for you and your phone. He shows which features are worth shopping for, how to avoid being scammed when signing up for service and how to save minutes and money using voicemail, directory assistance, picture sending and more.

LAPTOPS
Laptops: they're the fastest-growing kind of computer, the road warrior's trusty companion. David Pogue, The New York Times tech columnist, takes this show on the road, literally, and offers advice on getting online, protecting your laptop from theft and destruction, using public wireless hot spots without being eavesdropped and presenting PowerPoint pitches while connected to a projector.

DIGITAL CAMERAS
Digital cameras have revolutionized photography; in less than a decade, they almost completely wiped film cameras off the map. But that doesn't mean they're idiot-proof. The New York Times tech columnist David Pogue demonstrates how to buy a camera, avoid common photo-taking pitfalls, fix up the lousy shots on the computer and finally present the results to your adoring public via slideshow, e-mail, DVD or website.

IPODS
You knew that your iPod plays music. But did you know it's also a stopwatch, alarm clock, Web-page reader, audio book, recipe reader, TiVo recorder, karaoke machine, podcast player, radio, big-screen TV and YouTube viewer? You will, once The New York Times tech columnist David Pogue gets finished.

SAVING PAST DATA
At this very moment, all of your audio, video and photographic memories are disintegrating, slowly but surely. VHS tapes have only a 15-year shelf life before the image begins to degrade; cassette tapes, same problem; and plenty of computer storage formats are no longer playable because nobody makes the programs or the disk drives anymore. In this show, The New York Times tech columnist David Pogue shows you how to rescue all of these decaying or disappearing formats: home movies on film, vinyl records, VHS tapes, audio tapes, data on floppy disks, slides, prints and more.

IT'S ALL GEEK TO ME is produced for The Science Channel by City Lights Television. Dave Noll and Christopher Stout produced for City Lights and Mark Allen is executive producer for The Science Channel.


Geek to Me [Discovery]

]]>
Fri, 18 May 2007 20:17:39 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261815&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYTimes' Pogue Tests High Def Hard Drive Camcorders ]]> Pogue's back from vacation, and this week, he's taking a look at high def hard drive camcorders (or, HDHD camcorders), marveling at the gadgets that giving your boring home videos the same picture pizazz as professional HD content. In his words, the picture is "sharp enough to slice a tomato." And your goofy dad will never tape over old content ever again because he accidentally hit rewind bfore hitting record.

He tests the recently announced HDR-SR7 and the JVC Everio GZ-HD7, ultimately preferring the Sony's more stabilized shot, better battery life, and more grainy but detailed low light picture. The Everio's 3 chips, one for red, green, and blue, didn't do a damn thing for visual quality.

What's cool is that both cameras can get HD content onto standard def DVDs (even though you can't play them back in most DVD players). The Sony solution works on Sony Blu-ray players and the PS3. JVC has a proprietary burner that only plays back the JVC discs in HD, for $400. Sounds like a pain in the ass.

Pogue also has a list of his favorite gadgets posted on his blog. Worth a read.

Video review of the cameras, post jump.

UPDATE: Most cameras like this require you to use their own editing software, or, if compatible, Ulead's AVCHD editing software. The Sony has a plugin that will let you use it with iMovie. Unfortunately, like we've seen before, Pogue confirms that the transformation from the camera's format to the iMovie compatible one takes about 5x the length of each clip to process. Bollocks!

The cameras are both 1080i, although Pogue let's us know that the important thing differences between two are bitrate video is recorded at, and the format. The Sony cam packs data down to half the size of the JVC, but uses a better codec, so it is actually better than half the quality.

A confusing space, indeed, for the average consumer.

Your Life, in a Movie of Top Quality [NYTimes]

]]>
Fri, 04 May 2007 18:40:54 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=257936&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYT Pulp Watch: Pogue Spanks Sansa's Connect for Lame Yahoo! Connection ]]> spanking.jpgDavid Pogue of the NY Times saw so much potential in the Sansa Connect, the Wi-Fi music player that can tap into Yahoo's big online database without a PC in sight. But it disappointed him. And you know what happens when daddy is disappointed. Spankings.

Sansa's chief ingredient: instant real-time flat-fee access to anything in Yahoo's catalog of two million songs. The spontaneity would put the iPod to shame. The song-requesting feature would put satellite radio to shame. And the Wi-Fi freedom would make the Zune crawl back into its hole.

Unfortunately, no matter what SanDisk says, you do not have access to all of Yahoo's two million songs—because the Sansa doesn't offer any way to find them. There's no Search command, no master list of bands or albums—no direct access at all.

In fact, you can download only a tiny fraction of Yahoo's catalogs: just what Yahoo decides to offer you on three sampler platters.

The first sampler is Yahoo's set of 200 Internet radio stations. These are especially cool ones, because (if you're a paid subscriber) you can hit the Skip button to start streaming the next song in the "radio station's" playlist at any time. More amazingly still, when you hear a song you like, you can download it to your player, or even the entire album, with two button taps.

Second, you can get the songs on Yahoo's Most Popular lists in various genres. Finally, you can browse a list of recommendations that Yahoo calculates on the songs you've rated highly using the Sansa's click wheel.

But worse, even of those songs, there are some that are just impossible to download for legal reasons.

Worse, a disappointing percentage of the songs and albums never arrive at all. Whenever you select a song for download, the words "Request Added" appear on the screen; confusingly, the player doesn't begin downloading immediately, but rather adds your requests to a list that's sometimes downloading and sometimes not.

You have to burrow deeply into its menus to find the waiting list. That's also where you find the folder called Unable to Download.

Yahoo explains that many of its songs are internally flagged as "not downloadable" in a complex copy-protection scheme. Fine, but then the Sansa should identify them up front instead of getting your hopes up.

Did we mention it can squirt songs, like a Zune, to other Sansa Connect players? It can. Also, he shakes his head at the Connect's lame propensity to shut down Wi-Fi if batteries drop below 60%, the lack of video capability in this day and age. What do you think you are, Sansa Connect? An iPod nano? A brutal drop-kick on the Connect, from the Pogue-ster.

A Music Player That Needs Seasoning [NYTimes]

]]>
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:34:21 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=253838&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYT Pulp Bite: Pogue on 802.11n-ightmare Routers ]]> Not an easy two weeks for the Poguester. First, he pulls an all-nighter putting together last week's video. And this week, he spends four days trying to get the N routers from Belkin, Linksys and Netgear running at the claimed speeds. That 300Mbps rating? It must have been measured on the moon, he quips.

He reinstalls his OS, tries different laptops, works through easter, and even takes the gear to the middle of a state park to see if interference is the culprit. No dice. Most routers didn't pass the 50Mbps speed. Except Apple's which he gives top marks to. He speculates that the Apple Airport Extreme's N implementation in the 5GHz band (vs the 2.4GHz that the other routers use) gives it its advantage.

So, basically, these dedicated networking companies just had their asses handed to them by Apple's Airport Extreme router. (He also notice the same lack of gigabit ethernet that we did, but fails to mention the incompatibility with XBox 360s's Live network.) Useful info if you're going to buy an N setup anytime soon.

Interestingly, the Belkin got a recommendation, despite the failure to pass the 50Mbps mark. Maybe he's afraid of being called an Apple fanboy and wants to provide an alternative? I wouldn't have.

The video, as always, is worth watching. This week's is done like a bedtime story.

A Faster Wi-Fi World Is Coming [NYTimes]

]]>
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:55:42 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=252196&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sony's $20 Million Dollar Ad Campaign Dupes Pogue's One Day Video ]]>
The NYTimes writes that Sony spent $20 million at the BBDO advertising agency, so they could make some lighthearted gadget ads. A portion of that large sum bought them a Sony Handycam commercial that showed a 20 year old acting like a baby in a bathtub so his parents could relive his infant moments. What the NYTimes doesn't realize is that BBDO's ad they wrote about is disturbingly similar to that made by their own Gadget Editor in Chief, David Pogue. The video, which is our favorite, is about an AV conversion gadget also by Sony. He also made his video in a day, at what I'm guessing is far less than a portion of $20 million dollars.

Pogue-o Schtick video after the jump.


Nice one. David, ask for a raise. Sony, go scold someone.

The ads, and the driving philosophy behind them, are far superior to those stodgy, self-important PS3 ads that had us so confused. Something the focus groups and artists working on that project forgot: Video games are supposed to be fun.

With New Agency, Sony Tries to Focus Its Electronics Image [NYTimes]

]]>
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:20:27 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=251501&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYT Pulp Bite: Pogue on Why TiVo Still Rocks ]]> I am 100% in accordance with Pogue's reasons why TiVo Series 3 is still an important gadget that deserves your love. And David blows away last week's off-topic video with an animated deathmatch of TiVo versus a generic cable box. TiVo wins, all courtesy of broadband bits!

Here's why: In a day of Xbox 360 Elites and marginal iPod upgrades, TiVo is actually upgrading their boxes for little or no more money. TiVo, if you haven't been keeping track, can stream photos and music from your computer, accept programming from a Verizon cellphone, download movies from Amazon's Unbox service, and podcasts, as well as check movie, weather and traffic info. They even have lame guru advice video columns! (Wait a minute...)

Anyhow, the lack of new hardware may make you think that there's nothing significantly new. But you're wrong. But would you rather have incremental upgrades that require you to buy a whole new unit? (Xbox 360 Elite, iPod) or nice revisions every quarter (Xbox Live, Zune.) People, this is a gift! A gift from TiVo. So show 'em some love and pick up a set.

David Pogue, I even I understand why you choose to compare the TiVo to a generic cable box, instead of facing off a Series 3 versus a cable card–equipped media center. (It's a better comparison since most people still can't afford the HD setups.)

Video and Article: TiVo Plays a Trump Card: Web Smarts [NYTimes]

]]>
Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:09:39 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=250155&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Round Up Reference: The Best Apple TV Posts from Giz and Friends ]]> apple_tv_greatestits.jpgMost of us have reached a turning point. That point is, if you hear anything else about Apple TV you're going to vomit. Don't hold it back, or it's going to come out your nose.

But maybe you're of the mind to actually buy one, and need to do some hard research. If so, bookmark this post that our sexy librarian friend put together for us: Here's a list of the best Apple TV stories on Giz and beyond from the two weeks since Mossberg launched review number 1.

First, Giz. We've covered the bajeezus out of AppleTV. Here's the first unboxing, some surprises upon grope, a couple of pet peeves, the first setup video, a head to head with Microsoft's Media Center and XBox 360. (And unnaturally, Apple TV versus Tivo Series 3.)And a cable buying guide, as well as the mega gallery of hardware and screenshots. Shoot, I almost forgot our review. Verdict: Good, but not going in the Pants...Although we'd consider this one licked by her Munness.

Of course, Giz aside, there's a whole lot of good Apple TV coverage out there. From blogs, to Mac sites, to PC rags, to the daily papers, here is the best of what our others have been saying about Apple TV.

Mossy's Review at the WSJ: We have to start with Sir Mossberg and sidekick Katie B's 10-day scoop on the AppleTV. I even fantasize that the entire ship date was pushed back so he'd have time to check out the hardware and do a review. The power! His video is average, but the review itself is classic Mossberg: Authoritative, fair, and in language your mom could understand.

The NYTimes and Pogue were 24-hours late, but his charming video, and comparisons to both Netgear's HD capable, complex streamer, and the XBox ecosystem make it worthwhile. Did he have early access? Or did he put the review and video together in 24 hours?

CNet: Their review was detailed, and long, but my favorite piece of CNet coverage came from this extended list of every conceivable Apple TV competitor and alternative. And John "Sheriff" Falcone did it before the Apple TV even launched. Interestingly, they posted it under their Crave, not CNet brand.

Jimmy L's pub, PC Magazine, has the deepest review yet, spanning several thousand words that I find no more appealing to read than a college textbook. But if you want the ultimate in authority and depth, no go further than this review.

Wait. Then there's this Ars review.

iLounge: LC Angell and gang are Apple Journo vets. That shows through in these two nice articles, in top 10 form, listing geek factoids and reasons why you don't need an AppleTV. Concise, and topped with a nice Live Sizemodo-ish Gallery of AppleTV with an iPod and Mac Mini. Did I mention those bastards have TWO Apple TVs?

Wired: Wired's newly designed Gadgetlab, a outlying fort in the Wired Universe that I used to command, is looking goood these days. Robby B. kicks off a nicely hedged list that still manages to have the personality of a polarized rant in his short, bitter, and sweet piece entitled, "5 Reasons Why Apple TV Rules, 5 Reasons Why it Sucks".

What's left to read after you make the plunge? A lot of hacks. Most importantly, the ones that put Mac OS X on the Apple TV. And there's the HDD upgrade, easy as pie.
The geeks have only begun to unlock this baby. So, follow the rest of our eternally ongoing Apple TV coverage right here.

Now, excuse me while I swallow my spit up.


Apple TV
[Gizmodo]

]]>
Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:16:49 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=246487&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ My David Pogue Obsession Continues: Latest NYT Gadget Video Has Boobs, Arson and Snark ]]> [Updated for improved fairness] What the shit is this? I think New York Times' David Pogue just challenged the Internet to a gadget-video deathmatch. I just saw this video where he cranks an iPod speaker backpack to 11 in a quiet library, has a bikini'd babe dunk it in a hot tub, and finally drenches it in lighter fluid and sets it ablaze.

Kind of.

Actually, the video mockingly edits out the fun parts, in response to some blogger with a shitty sense of humor who compared his hijinx to the crap on America's Funniest Home Videos. (The blogger was NOT me, really. I call him a nutjob, but love the work. ) So basically, David Pogue just used the Grey Lady to flame a random blogger. How...bloggerish of him. Can't really blame him, though. What would you do if someone said your jokes reminded them of Bob Saget?

Back to the review. Usually, David Pogue, like other A-listers, only has to get off his butt to check out one gadget a week. (That is jealousy you're detecting, btw.) Given that pace, he usually finds something profoundly useful or cool to write about. The backpack is just underwhelming, as a product. And the accompanying story is a bit of a letdown, too. Nothing sub par, but not on level with the antics we've been treated to the last few weeks. Call us spoiled by the music videos and comedy routines paired with a-grade, up to the minute gadgets. It's too bad this one blogger set him off his pace.

He goes back for a three-peat of stories about converting media, and does the old standby story about how to put old analog tapes and records to CD and DVD. Dude, you did similar stories in November of last year, and you touched upon that not more than two weeks ago. To his credit, this one is more complete, actionable, and broken down by media type. But I hoped for something like a new CTIA phone inside the video. (Samsung Upstage, perhaps.)

Please, ignore the flame bait, drop the junk gadgets, and leave that fuzz to us. Because when you do meta/prank stuff like this, I'm scared for the security of my job. This low-brow stuff is my bread and butter, man. Leave me something to do.

David Pogue Reviews Random IPod Backpack [NYTimes]

]]>
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:00:13 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=247990&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple TV Pulp Bite: NYT's Pogue Faces-Off the Streamer with Foes; PC Mag Goes Deep ]]> Mossberg's review and video were straight up. Let's face it: He didn't need any fancy angling other than the 10-day lead he had on everyone, including nemesis (by publication), David Pogue.

Finally, Pogue's video is here, and as expected, it's entertaining and recommended. Click on to see a full grown man having childlike fun reviewing a gadget. Another nice touch is his comparison to the high definition Netgear streamer, the EVA8000.
The difference? Apple's iTunes won't even supply HD video and those who crave simplicity, while the complex Netgear has compatibility with many formats, in 1080i HD, at the expense of ease of use. Then he compares it to our beloved XBox 360.

For those of you who need deeper reviews — like Mariana Trench deep — PC Magazine has one that'll do the trick. As for the one that tells you to buy it or not, here's our official take: Not quite worthy of an unpantsing.

Rating Pogue's Review:
Timeliness: 8/10
Depth: 8/10
Entertainment Value: 10/10

Rating Mossberg's AppleTV Review:
Timeliness: 11/10
Depth: 7/10
Entertainment Value: 7/10


Rating PC Magazine's Review:

Timeliness: 7/10
Depth: 11/10
Entertainment Value: 1/10

*All get high marks for authority, when you consider their respective target demographics.
Pogue's Apple TV Video Review [NYTimes]

]]>
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:43:35 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=246434&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ PogueWatch: David Goes Nuts on NYTimes Gadget Video ]]>
The last two weeks of David Pogue videos on the NYTimes website have shown us that the guy has totally cracked. And he has more fun at work than we do.

First, last week's video. David, who just the week before, wouldn't stop going on about his love for MiniDV video tapes, this week reviews a gadget by Sony that transfers all "old tapes" to DVD. (Aha, you've come around to the idea that rewinding sucks.) He likes it, and reports it burned the occasional coaster. What's remarkable about it is watching the senior gadget journo's setup to his video review. Hit play if you want to see a grown man relive his 7th birthday, his prom, his learning to ride a bike, and even some crib time as an infant. Frightening, but I'm somehow entertained enough to watch it, I don't know, seven or eight times. Yesterday. OK, I'm totally obsessed with the non-standard format. Is this the NY Times?

Then, this week he does a whole infomercial on Grandcentral.com, in the biggest Pogue love fest I can remember.

The service, which allows you to fwd all calls from disparate numbers to all your phones at once, is free (for two lines) and allows niceties such as getting your phone to leave separate voicemails for different callers. The choice quote:

Leave one message for your boss, and anotha for your lovaaaaaaaa
[Sexy enunciation his, not ours!] I suppose he refrains from criticism because the service is free. What, no spam? Really?

I wish I had a camera crew.

We're still waiting for music videos gadget reviews from the former Broadway arranger.

Pogue Vids [NYTimes]

]]>
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:30:46 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=244278&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The NYTimes' Pogue: Obsessed with Nikon's Superzoom Lens ]]> While David Pogue, the brain behind the Grey Lady's tech coverage, is on his geek cruise in the Carribean, he's had some "close up" time with a Nikon DSLR and a 18-200mm, vibration reducing lens. That's enough focal range to cover a Macworld Keynote from the thirtieth row back, and also get wide angle closeups of new iPods after. We have to agree with him in saying that's quite a hot piece of glass. (Our words.)

Too bad it's almost impossible to get.

It's good enough that the man who can get his mitts on any gadget in the world requested one for Christmas from Mrs. Pogue. He didn't get one.

This is because the lens is so hot, it's been sold out all over the country and even Amazon is marking up its $750 price to the $1000 range in response to the short supply.
David "Piano Man" Pogue goes on to talk about the optical characteristics of the lens, pegging it to the overall trend of image stabilizing cameras. I agree with him on many points, like the fact that there is a trend in IS cameras. But I disagree when he says:

Only *optical* image stabilization counts.
He discounts all the image stabilizing cams that use sensors with faster ISOs (that is, sensors with more light sensitivity.) But those chips can also eliminate blurry shots by making the shutter speed much faster. Sure, its not actually shifting the lens or sensor mechanically, but you know what? A clear shot is a clear shot. The common people wouldn't make a distinction, and they would happen to enjoy the slimmer form factor that the higher ISO point and shoots maintain without bulky stabilizing equipment.

Mr Pogue writes and tells us the sample shots from the lens will be available soon as he gets off that damn love boat. And David, we're still waiting for that iPhone song.

The Magic Behind the Superzoom Lens [NYT]

Nikon 18-200 VR Lens
[Nikon]

]]>
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 20:42:55 EST Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=235234&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tech Journo Trivia: David Pogue the Elton John of Gadgets ]]> elton_pogue.jpgI was surprised when NYT's tech journo David Pogue's most recent blog post was written as a song Hazing to the RIAA. His lead claimed that he had a music past as a Broadway conductor and arranger, which a little emailing and googling confirmed.

These days, its rare to find opinions from Pogue that differ from Mossberg's (and more than often, our own.)

That's why his stand out tech coverage comes in the form of inimitable spoofs on tech put to pop songs.

There's Don't Cry for Me Cupertino, a song about the second coming of Steve Jobs. And a song about Microsoft Word 15 being almost a Gig set to Jingle Bells. And my favorite, the best is his Bill Gates impression during the Stevie Wonder Inspired "I just Called to Say I Bought You."Listen to em here.

But none of the songs are recent. Maybe the Times have David running so ragged, now that he's basically shouldering the rogue Circuits section, that he doesn't have time for these anymore. I'm hoping for a Bollywood music video about the iPhone, set to Journey.

Tech Song Spoofs [Davidpogue.com]

]]>
Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:56:14 EST Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=230872&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Top iPhone Articles from the A-Team of Tech Reporting ]]> techateam2.jpgLook, real reporting!

David Pogue's triplet of iPhone coverage comes in the form of his own hands on, an FAQ, and a video of the phone in his paws. From what I know, he's the only gadget journo that was allowed to film/photograph during his meeting. And it's funny. So this is the vid to watch. (And if you haven't seen it, here's our own, blog-exclusive, hands on.)

Walt Mossberg shows us why he's the highest paid tech journo ever, refusing to get sucked into the vortex of iPhone love: "I attended the iPhone launch event, and was able to use one for a little while. That's too brief an encounter to allow me to write a proper review." He did give a short preview, mentioning the same positives and potential problems the rest of us who touched it had. This is astounding, considering that this was all written in the context of a Samsung Blackjack review. By the way, I met Walt and Katie over the week, and to his credit, he didn't throttle me. A very forgiving man, considering I've photoshopped him onto more than one thonged body, when inspiration called. Cheers.

Of course, when it comes to things Apple, Levy, Author of The Perfect Thing, is the wild man on the scene.

Steven Levy's piece, called Apple Computer is Dead; Long Live Apple is not only headlined wrong, but is remarkable simply for the reason why most of his work is remarkable: Steve Jobs Talks to him. I cannot write more until Two bad jokes are made. This makes Levy a modern Moses, and when Levy calls the iPhone the Holy Trinity ("an iPod, a phone and internet communicator"), I just die thinking of how many times I can use that when speaking in reverence of the Jesus Phone. Anyhow, here's the meat: Levy reveals Steve's thinking on why Cingular ("We decided what the phone is"), why OS X on iPhone won't be open ("Cingular doesn't want to see their West Coast network go down because some application messed up."), and that real iChat isn't available, and neither is the ability to turn mp3s into ringtones, but that they are both possible. The ringtone issue sexy as hell in a legit device such as this, but fundamentally fucked unless Cingular decides to choose being cool over being rich.

Peter Lewis's piece at Fortune is called "How Apple kept its iPhone secrets". Those who follow Apple's product releases shouldn't be surprised. We all know that the Jobs and Co. have no problem keeping the loose lips from flapping. What's cool is hearing how Yahoo!, Google, Cingular employees were thrown off the track with spy-tastic techniques like 100% software development prototypes (not all that rare), and counterintelligence methods like decoy hardware models.

What other mainstream media iPhone articles have you enjoyed?

All Things iPhone [Gizmodo]

]]>
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:32:39 EST Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228485&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYT's David Pogue: Wiimote Throwers Are Babies ]]> poguewii2.pngGaming isn't his beat, but David Pogue takes a look at the Wii. His stance is aligned with most of the Wii-loving press. But his late take gives him the perspective to include a message to the Wiimote-tossing, sloth gaming Nerds, parallel to Gizmodo's thoughts on the issue. Gutsy.

Online, there are already gripes and legal threats regarding Wii-induced muscle aches, which is pretty much what you'd expect from nerds who haven't moved their bodies in years...I have equally little sympathy for people who wind up with nicks and bruises because they ignore the huge, on-screen warning that, before every game, advises you to move furniture out of the way.
Right on. He also wonders why more reviewers haven't called out the Wii's potential for getting kids to get off the couch, as compared to traditional joystick wrangling.

And, in what must be a response to his blog's burgeoning troll traffic, he deftly pre-addresses his hate mail.

Now, I already know what kind of hate mail I'm going to get. "You're a terrible parent," it'll say. "Your kids should be outside getting fresh air and sunshine, playing stickball and walking a mile to school, uphill both ways!"

Yes, O.K., sure. That would be great.

That would also be 1950.

Nice: He fits an SNL grumpy old man reference into the grumpy old Grey Lady.

I am, however, suggesting that the Wii is infinitely better for our kids' health than any other video or computer game - in fact, better than just about any other indoor activity.
True. But not better than DDR, and its flesh-heaving routines.

Pogue's Blog [NYTimes]

]]>
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:56:35 EST Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=225003&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue Follows Up on Netiquette Debate ]]> unclepogue.jpgWe tend to poke fun at the New York Times' David Pogue a lot around here, but we want to make it clear that we kid because we love. David is like the wacky yet dorky uncle of the tech journalism world, how could we not like him?

Pogue recently complained about the lack of online etiquette found on message boards and blog comments these days, and left the floor open to comments. He went ahead and followed up on this with a bunch of reader feedback, and it's a fascinating discussion to be sure. Go on and check it out, and show Uncle Dave some respect, ya hear?

The Netiquette Diaries [NY Times]

]]>
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:55:34 EST Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=224253&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue Points Out Vista's "Coincidences" with Mac OS X ]]> Did Microsoft rip off Apple's Mac OS X when making Vista? New York Times tech superstar David Pogue takes it upon himself to highlight the "coincidences" between both operating systems and show us why they're different. Nothing like a little tech sarcasm for the holidays. Long live Mac OS X. Er, I mean Vista.


Vista vs OS X (Spanish) [Gizmologia]

]]>
Mon, 25 Dec 2006 10:30:16 EST Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=224076&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ David Pogue Doesn't Like Mean Commenters; Let Him Have it, Guys ]]> poguerespect.jpgNew York Times tech diva David Pogue took some time out of his day today to pontificate on the general nastiness that can be found basically on any site that allows comments. He certainly brings up some interesting points, and anyone who has spent time browsing through comments at Digg, Slashdot, or even here on our beloved Gizmodo can attest to the fact that people have a tendency to throw insults first and ask questions later. But is it that people aren't raising their kids right and that people are generally meaner today than they were in the "good old days," or is it more the nature of the beast?

I for one tend to get emboldened when I'm behind the keyboard. Typing anonymous comments to people you'll never actually meet in person is a really dehumanizing thing, even as it purports to connect us. It really has more in common with talking to ourselves than it does with actually talking to another person, so the normal filters of tact and self-restraint are peeled away. That's not really an excuse to be needlessly mean or nasty to other people online, but I think it probably has a lot to do with explaining the phenomenon.

I don't think that all hope is lost, however. I may be trying to not shit where I eat here, but I think the Giz has a collection of some of the more articulate commenters around. Even when I need to get slapped around for lax fact checking/speedy post writing the pigpile is generally only a couple people deep. It's certainly nothing compared to the fracas at Digg, which can feel more like a schoolyard than a tech site full of intelligent adults. I think it probably has a lot to do with the semi-closed comment accounts that give people pause before posting something particularly inflammatory.

So what's the deal, commenters? This whole discussion is about you, so let's hear it. Have you sometimes crossed the line into nasty territory and later regretted it? Is there something in particular about the online environment that breeds misanthropes? Is Pogue just a big wuss who doesn't come down from his ivory tower at the Times enough and can't take the heat of hanging with the proles? Do some of you want to apologize for hurting my feelings? I'm waiting.

Whatever Happened to Online Etiquette? [NY Times]

]]>
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:53:25 EST www.gizmodo.com http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=221978&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pogue on Vista: Lets You Safely Keep Your Porny Wallpaper ]]> Pogue%20Porn.jpg New York Times tech superhero, David Pogue, is giving us his first impressions on Microsoft's forthcoming Windows Vista. He praises the OS' elegance saying its "infinitely more pleasant to use than its predecessors." He also gives MS kudos for its improved Speech Recognition app, which he deems is better than previous incarnations. But his favorite feature it seems is Vista's Presentation Mode, which aside from keeping your laptop from going to sleep during a presentation, can automatically:
"Change your desktop wallpaper to something uncontroversial, so your bosses won't unexpectedly glimpse the HotBikiniBabes.com photo that you usually use."
Now we're talking. If that's not reason enough to upgrade, I don't know what is!

Vista Wins on Looks. As for Lacks [NYT]

]]>
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:27:28 EST Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=221809&view=rss&microfeed=true