• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#digitalcameras#gtblogging

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #whitenoise,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #broken,
  • etc.

New York, 10:40 PM
Tue Dec 15
75 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of kosai kosai
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Luma Loop, making pickpockets lives easier since 2009.
     Reply
    kosai was starred kosai was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Mil Spec AR-15 weapon sling. Please note the "untrustworthy" plastic connectors...
    [www.militarymorons.com]
    There are many kinds of plastic.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    $60?? I now have more than enough info to make this for about $2. Less if I use some old straps and connectors I have lying around.
    It's a good idea. I have been using a neck strap and a single point of connection like in the video for a while now. I made it myself, works great. I can detach the camera in seconds and still have a wrist strap just in case.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of Sticks Calhoun Sticks Calhoun
    12/11/09

    In reply to The Exemode Keychain Camera Has a Loveable Crappiness About It
    A bit cheaper and they'd be a blast to do things like tie to your dog's collar for a while, or stick on a kite or balloon.
     Reply
    Sticks Calhoun was starred Sticks Calhoun was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/11/09

    In reply to The Exemode Keychain Camera Has a Loveable Crappiness About It
    I could buy a shitty *real* camera for that much, or someone's used nice one.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of dimsum4u dimsum4u
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Seems cool. I'm not a photographer so don't know the real benefit to it. But I kind of think instead of the backpack style clips. They should use something else like maybe a caribeaner (totally spelled wrong.) The plastic clips seem to easy to pop off. Just a thought. 60$ does seem like quite a bit for that little strap though.
     Reply
    dimsum4u was starred dimsum4u was unstarred
    Image of Navin R Johnson Navin R Johnson
    12/11/09

    In reply to The Exemode Keychain Camera Has a Loveable Crappiness About It
    /are you sure you didn't mess up the decimal place? $6.50? Yes. $65...No.
     Reply
    Navin R Johnson was starred Navin R Johnson was unstarred
    Image of thechansen thechansen
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Ahhh, the awkward man-boob splitting strap. But yeah this is hardly new, or worth while for the price.
     Reply
    thechansen was starred thechansen was unstarred
    Image of OCEntertainment OCEntertainment
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    "You talking to me?" *whips out floppy disk*
     Reply
    OCEntertainment was starred OCEntertainment was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    If you already spent $1,300 or more on your DSLR, eh, why the heck not.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    12/11/09

    In reply to The Best Point and Shoot Cameras for Every Purpose
    Anyone have any recommendations for a low end (cheapish) digital camera that takes quick pictures?

    Useless information/rant follows if you're bored (all I have is free time at the moment):

    My mom has one that is ready to snap photos just a few seconds after it's turned on, but requires nearly 15 seconds to take another. I borrowed that one because my wife's camera takes 10-15 seconds to power up, and also takes too long in between photos (I have gone through different modes and settings). Then, my camcorder takes decent photos as quickly as you can take them, but there is no flash and it's something I don't want to always carry with me.

    I never realized how slow they were until I tried taking spur-of-the-moment pictures of my baby ("I formed babby").

    I hate this need for splash screen startups, or automatic picture review after one is taken (I also don't like how people, especially my wife, feel they need to review every single photo immediately after. You were just there!), and know I don't need a 30 megapixel camera with three displays and YouTube, Facebook, or other built-in fad support.
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    12/11/09

    @madog: They may not literally take 10-15 seconds, but when you're trying to take pictures of a babys smile or something, 7 seconds can feel like an eternity; and the moment may be gone by then.

    I also don't know anything about cameras so I don't know if they specifically rate that or have categories for a digital camera that works as fast as one from 15 years ago that took pics as fast as you could wind the film.

    Any information about it would be greatly appreciated!
     Reply
    Edited by madog at 12/11/09 5:01 PM madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of FigNinja FigNinja
    12/11/09

    @madog: This site has really good reviews:

    [www.dpreview.com]

    They often give list how long all those things take for a given camera. The forums are really helpful, too.
     Reply
    FigNinja was starred FigNinja was unstarred
    Image of che-che che-che
    12/11/09

    @madog: i bought the kodak easy share m1033 for like 130 bucks if not less.

    really good for snapshots and keeping in your pocket. i like it. i keep it in my car. has a good battery life. if i need it i got a usb car adapter so it will charge on the drive to the event. it holds up pretty good. takes good photos.

    is that cheap enough.
     Reply
    madog promoted this comment che-che was starred che-che was unstarred
    Image of che-che che-che
    12/11/09

    @madog: oh! and it does start up fairly quickly around 3 seconds. and if you are taking regular snapshots, no long exposure and all that bull. its pretty instant.
     Reply
    madog promoted this comment che-che was starred che-che was unstarred
    Image of LatimerAnaxibia LatimerAnaxibia
    12/11/09

    @madog: There are a couple options but specifically I'd look at the Canon SD 1200 IS. It's got the digic IV processor, a fast lens, and it runs around $150 right now. Not too fancy in the spec department (3x zoom range, 10mp, SD movie ability) but it's a solid little camera.
     Reply
    madog promoted this comment LatimerAnaxibia was starred LatimerAnaxibia was unstarred
    Image of Gene Gene
    12/11/09

    @madog: Second the Canon SD1200. I'm sure others are good too, but Canon's always made very snappy compacts.
     Reply
    madog promoted this comment Gene was starred Gene was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    12/12/09

    @Gene @LatimerAnaxibia @che-che @FigNinja: Thanks for the info guys! I appreciate it. I'll definitely check out that site/forum and that Canon/Kodak. And yes, while $30 for one would be awesome, I'd expect to pay around $150 for a decent one these days.

    With all of the different models out there with bonus novelty features and smile recognition and volume knobs that go to 11, it can be confusing to find a decent, simple camera that does what it's supposed to well.

    (tried to promote all replies in case this multi-reply doesn't work as I'd imagine it to. Hopefully others find this useful too!)
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of podspawn podspawn
    12/12/09

    @madog: Canon A1100. On sale for $129 if you look around. Amazing photos. I bought 10 for a photo class I teach to school kids and I've been blown away by the results.
     Reply
    madog promoted this comment podspawn was starred podspawn was unstarred
    Image of TonyWonder TonyWonder
    12/11/09

    In reply to The Best Point and Shoot Cameras for Every Purpose
    These descriptions sound like something Rod Roddy would say while running down the items on the Showcase Showdown..."all this and more could be yours on the Price Is Right!"
     Reply
    TonyWonder was starred TonyWonder was unstarred
    Image of John_001 John_001
    12/11/09

    @TonyWonder: That man's voice is cemented in my childhood memories. Much like Robert Stack... Both passed away. R.I.P.
     Reply
    TonyWonder promoted this comment John_001 was starred John_001 was unstarred
    Image of TonyWonder TonyWonder
    12/11/09

    @John_001: same... remember his insane outfits? and how red in the face he use to get? Lets hope he's doing tons of blow off strippers asses in heaven... thats what he deserves
     Reply
    TonyWonder was starred TonyWonder was unstarred
    Image of SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!!
    12/08/09

    In reply to Buy 200GB of Google Storage, Get a Free Eye-Fi Card
    I don't trust on online storage...
    But the eye-fi is tempting.
     Reply
    SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was starred SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/08/09

    In reply to Buy 200GB of Google Storage, Get a Free Eye-Fi Card
    Hell of a better deal than MobileMe. Heh.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    12/08/09

    @Kaiser-Machead: Edited semi angry post about usefulness of MobileMe for people like me. Reeeeeeetracted cause it wasn't necessary and was mainly referring to it against the usefulness of the card, and not the storage space combo as a whole (which is still different, but still more useful together than the card itself).
     Reply
    Edited by madog at 12/08/09 8:47 PM madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of Curves Curves
    12/08/09

    In reply to Buy 200GB of Google Storage, Get a Free Eye-Fi Card
    I will soon be stashing stuff all over the net in free storage so I can move into a new computer and then redownload it all back onto the new one. I know that isnt efficient, but its free. :)
     Reply
    Curves was starred Curves was unstarred
    Image of ninjamurf ninjamurf
    12/08/09

    @Curves: What are you using? I've got one of the free Dropbox accounts and it's pretty awesome but I only have 2GB of space. I was stoked when I heard about Goggle dropping their prices on storage before I found out it's just used as an add on to gmail and picasa accounts. Have you looked into any of the other services? How do they stack up?
     Reply
    Curves promoted this comment ninjamurf was starred ninjamurf was unstarred
    Image of Curves Curves
    12/08/09

    @ninjamurf: I have limited free storage at Google, MSN and Yahoo, all of which I keep e mail accounts at, as well as a pay photo site that can store a lot of pics, and a lot of them are still on the card in the camera. I am re-thinking this, though, and considering a portable hard drive, since I am finding myself on the move a lot more lately between 2 or 3 work computers and 2 or 3 at home. I have never had any problems with the on line storage though, and have a lot of "stuff" stashed here and there.
     Reply
    Curves was starred Curves was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    12/08/09

    @Curves: A portable USB harddrive would be worth the time and effort saved without one. Otherwise you'd have to worry about connection speeds and constant Internet access too.
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Image of madog madog
    12/08/09

    @madog: Or even a couple of cheap flash drives.
     Reply
    madog was starred madog was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.