• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#digitalcameras#discussedgtthe

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #whitenoise,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #broken,
  • etc.

New York, 5:40 PM
Mon Dec 21
43 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Deckard Deckard
    07:41 AM

    In reply to Ricoh and Stussy Remind Us Of Their Existence, With This Limited Edition Camera
    It looks like a pre-production prototype.
     Reply
    Deckard was starred Deckard was unstarred
    Image of Jrsy Devil's Advocate® Jrsy Devil's Advocate®
    06:01 AM

    In reply to Ricoh and Stussy Remind Us Of Their Existence, With This Limited Edition Camera
    $1,110 dollars?? No offense but it looks like it was made for about 3 bucks out of an old disposable camera housing. And the blue accents don't justify a price increase of $225 over the GR Digital III...
     Reply
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was starred Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was unstarred
    Image of Thee Sea Thee Sea
    05:30 AM

    In reply to Ricoh and Stussy Remind Us Of Their Existence, With This Limited Edition Camera
    $1,100 gets me 648x480 video and digital zoom?

    Excuse me if I don't claw at my pants in a desperate bid to get my wallet out. Why is digital zoom even a feature on anything these days?
     Reply
    Edited by Thee Sea at 12/21/09 5:30 AM Thee Sea was starred Thee Sea was unstarred
    Image of KinOfCain KinOfCain
    12:30 PM

    @Thee Sea: Because it has a prime lens, there's no optical zoom, and that's a feature, not a bug.
     Reply
    Thee Sea promoted this comment KinOfCain was starred KinOfCain was unstarred
    Image of Thee Sea Thee Sea
    01:06 PM

    @KinOfCain: ...Digital zoom offers no features a crop tool does not.
     Reply
    Thee Sea was starred Thee Sea was unstarred
    Image of KinOfCain KinOfCain
    03:00 PM

    @Thee Sea: Agreed, I meant the lack of optical zoom is a feature, not a bug. The lens wouldn't be as good if they had to cram a zoom mechanism into the same packaging.
     Reply
    KinOfCain was starred KinOfCain was unstarred
    Image of Thee Sea Thee Sea
    04:38 PM

    @KinOfCain: I'm complaining that digital zoom exists and the first place an that, seriously, 640x480 for video?
     Reply
    Thee Sea was starred Thee Sea was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    12/18/09

    In reply to Finally, Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 2.7 for Mac
    No Panasonic. That's why I use Lightroom!
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of ecarls002 ecarls002
    12/18/09

    @Noobs-R-Us: [support.apple.com]

    Plenty of Panasonic support. This is an update.

    Every initial comment in this thread is bashing first, asking questions later. The hate for AppleAnything clouds normal thought, eh?
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us promoted this comment ecarls002 was starred ecarls002 was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    12/19/09

    @ecarls002: I'm not the only one complaining about how Apple is aways the last to update their RAW compatibility. You can wait years before the Apple people get around to it. Hell, the Sigma folks will be dead before Apple gets around to implementing Sigma Raw. So, Mr. Genius, would you care to comment about that???

    That, my friend, is why I have a star . Star people know more about things than you think even though we sometimes are curt with our posts.

    [forums.dpreview.com]
     Reply
    Edited by Noobs-R-Us at 12/19/09 10:45 PM Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/18/09

    In reply to Finally, Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 2.7 for Mac
    Sort of puts another dent in the whole Macs-for-media thing. The fact that compatibility wasn't there in the first place is sad.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of LuckyPenny LuckyPenny
    12/18/09

    @Kaiser-Machead: Clearly not having RAW compatibility for those 6 cameras, versus the hundred or so it already had - without needing to download drivers proves your point. This is also especially confirmed with the no support for RAW in Windows 7 out-of-the-box.

    Silly macs with their updating continual support.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead promoted this comment Edited by LuckyPenny at 12/18/09 12:36 PM LuckyPenny was starred LuckyPenny was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/18/09

    @LuckyPenny: @Eulatos: OK OK Uncle. I didn't realize the bit about licensing fees for the formats.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of bornonbord bornonbord
    12/18/09

    In reply to Finally, Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 2.7 for Mac
    Well paint me silly: Was the entire Mac platform completely unable to deal with RAW from these cameras until now, or just Mac OS? In other words, were you able to work via CS4 but not OSX?
     Reply
    Edited by bornonbord at 12/18/09 12:25 PM bornonbord was starred bornonbord was unstarred
    Image of agahnim agahnim
    12/18/09

    @bornonbord: Just the OS and whatever applications that use the OS's RAW libraries (like Aperture)... It's nice when it works, but there's always Lightroom when it doesn't.
     Reply
    bornonbord promoted this comment agahnim was starred agahnim was unstarred
    Image of bornonbord bornonbord
    12/18/09

    @agahnim: Cheers bro
     Reply
    bornonbord was starred bornonbord was unstarred
    Image of Turkieshooter Turkieshooter
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Im not hanging 5k worth of lightbox and glass off a plastic clip. R-Straps been there done that, and has much better execution too.
     Reply
    TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H. promoted this comment Turkieshooter was starred Turkieshooter was unstarred
    Image of kosai kosai
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Luma Loop, making pickpockets lives easier since 2009.
     Reply
    kosai was starred kosai was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Mil Spec AR-15 weapon sling. Please note the "untrustworthy" plastic connectors...
    [www.militarymorons.com]
    There are many kinds of plastic.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of Ari Brown Ari Brown
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Wow... that thing has nothing on the R-strap, costs more, clearly ripped the idea off (even down to the promo footage of the guy using it) and fails the most obvious test - would you trust your camera to a plastic clip and some paracord or a locking metal gate and the tripod lug?
     Reply
    TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H. promoted this comment Noobs-R-Us approved this comment Ari Brown was starred Ari Brown was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    $60?? I now have more than enough info to make this for about $2. Less if I use some old straps and connectors I have lying around.
    It's a good idea. I have been using a neck strap and a single point of connection like in the video for a while now. I made it myself, works great. I can detach the camera in seconds and still have a wrist strap just in case.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of Sticks Calhoun Sticks Calhoun
    12/11/09

    In reply to The Exemode Keychain Camera Has a Loveable Crappiness About It
    A bit cheaper and they'd be a blast to do things like tie to your dog's collar for a while, or stick on a kite or balloon.
     Reply
    Sticks Calhoun was starred Sticks Calhoun was unstarred
    Image of Faceless.Troll Faceless.Troll
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Something about carrying it on the side like that just seems risky. Given how much people tend to bump into you on the side.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn promoted this comment Faceless.Troll was starred Faceless.Troll was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    12/11/09

    @Faceless.Troll: The idea is to sling it around to the small of your back when moving around.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of Faceless.Troll Faceless.Troll
    12/11/09

    @Gary_7vn: Even riskier.
     Reply
    Faceless.Troll was starred Faceless.Troll was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    12/12/09

    @Faceless.Troll: Well, we all may as well stay at home then. It's hopeless.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    12/11/09

    In reply to The Exemode Keychain Camera Has a Loveable Crappiness About It
    I could buy a shitty *real* camera for that much, or someone's used nice one.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of dimsum4u dimsum4u
    12/11/09

    In reply to LumaLoop: Wear (and Shoot) Your Camera Like an Assault Rifle
    Seems cool. I'm not a photographer so don't know the real benefit to it. But I kind of think instead of the backpack style clips. They should use something else like maybe a caribeaner (totally spelled wrong.) The plastic clips seem to easy to pop off. Just a thought. 60$ does seem like quite a bit for that little strap though.
     Reply
    dimsum4u was starred dimsum4u was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.