sorry, but i thought you could DL a book as many times as you wanted once you paid for it?....from the amazon kindle page "Automatic Library Backup: Download Your Books Anytime for Free
A copy of every book you purchased from the Kindle Store is backed up online at Amazon.com in case you ever need to download it again. You can wirelessly re-download books for free any time. This allows you to make room for new titles on your Kindle, knowing that Amazon is storing your personal library of Kindle books. We even back up your last page read and annotations, so you'll never lose those, either. Think of it as a bookshelf in your attic--even though you don't see it, you know your books are there."
@Zipthebunny: That's what I thought too, and I suppose we both thought that for good reason - because Amazon said it!
I'm flabergasted by this story. It's completely outrageous that Amazon doesn't let you download the books you've purchased to whatever device they're supported on. It very similar to Apple's scheme to control the number of devices you can download DRM'd music on to.
As far as I'm concerned if I purchase a digital book or a song, it's mine and I have the right to take it to whatever device I like. If Amazon or Apple restrict that, I feel completely justified in cracking the DRM or downloading a copy via P2P. EULA be damned.
Think of all of the people employed to make all of these incompatible products. In an economy like we have today, we really should be embracing the chaos that is modern copy protection.
You forgot to mention how to break the DRM, if this explaination included "EVERYTHING" you wanted to know. I want to know how to break Fairplay DRM specifically.
"but then again, it's not as easy to rip a stream for Joe Blow as it is to share a file over Limewire"
Remember, though - all it takes is one clued in guy to rip the stream and Joe Blow can download it over Limewire forever. This is why DRM really doesn't work.
@jackjumper: I think that's why Hollywood is glad that, for now, streaming video looks like ass. Can you imagine a super-clean non-hiccupy HD Hulu stream? I don't think NBC or Fox can either!
@KLanD: Keep watch on other laptop manufacturers. HDCP is not an Apple exclusive. As HD content becomes more and more available over the web, you'll find that protective measures will be all over the place.
Yeah, HDCP non universal playback sucks. But imagine if the pro-pirate POV was applied to any other industry:
"Yeah, I steal my computers, and if I like them maybe I'll buy one. If only there was a way to pay the systems engineer directly."
So who are the "artists" who should get paid for movies? The actors who are already overpaid to begin with? Should all the other people in the credits not get paid, from gaffer to bookkeeping, since they're not artists?
And to answer "how is this good for consumers?" The main benefit is if movie companies can make a profit, they'll keep making movies which ensures a stream of new movies for consumers, just as computer company profits ensure a stream of new computers.
I'm not saying it's good in any way to limit the use of any movie you buy in any way. If you buy it it should work on everything everywhere. But the idea that pirating is the answer, as if pirates run around buying things they like (if you do you're one in a trillion), belies that fact that without movie companies there'd be no movies.
As Chuck Norris has said many times: "without angels there'd be no rainbows, which is why I buy my angels rather than pirate them."
If this isn't a case for HandBrake, I don't know what is. I know that a file extracted and compressed from a standard DVD is not going to be even near HD quality, but it's sure as hell serviceable enough to get the job done, and not have stupid restrictions. Unfortunately, this is not so much an Apple problem, but a content provider problem. The MPAA thinks that everyone is out to get them all the time (and to some extent they are), but this sort of bullshit only gets more people to circumvent their restrictions. I can Netflix their crap for months and rip DVD's and send them back at my leisure for just a few bucks a month if I were so inclined.
I decided to move my iPhone to another computer, but don't know how to sync all the crap, particularly music. It used to be you just put the music on the other computer, or just sync your device with the other computer. But no. I friggin' hate iTunes. I want everything in 192+kbps mp3s and hands off. And when I think of all the money my friends and siblings are throwing down the rathole on music from iTunes they won't be able to play on anything but Apple devices it really pisses me off.
@vista64guy: I'm fairly certain that this has come to PC's first. Remember, Blu-Ray/HD DVD formats have been released on these for some time now, whereas they haven't even come to Apple yet.
If this is true, it's absurd. I can't imagine that public displays of movies is a significant copyright issue - I mean, when was the last time you were actually invited to a back-alley showing of Hellboy II in someone's basement where they actually charged you a dollar to get in? The real piracy is still in the P2P networks and the street-level commercial duplication.
06/21/09
"Automatic Library Backup: Download Your Books Anytime for Free
A copy of every book you purchased from the Kindle Store is backed up online at Amazon.com in case you ever need to download it again. You can wirelessly re-download books for free any time. This allows you to make room for new titles on your Kindle, knowing that Amazon is storing your personal library of Kindle books. We even back up your last page read and annotations, so you'll never lose those, either. Think of it as a bookshelf in your attic--even though you don't see it, you know your books are there."
06/21/09
I'm flabergasted by this story. It's completely outrageous that Amazon doesn't let you download the books you've purchased to whatever device they're supported on. It very similar to Apple's scheme to control the number of devices you can download DRM'd music on to.
As far as I'm concerned if I purchase a digital book or a song, it's mine and I have the right to take it to whatever device I like. If Amazon or Apple restrict that, I feel completely justified in cracking the DRM or downloading a copy via P2P. EULA be damned.
12/19/08
12/19/08
12/19/08
12/19/08
12/19/08
12/19/08
12/19/08
Remember, though - all it takes is one clued in guy to rip the stream and Joe Blow can download it over Limewire forever. This is why DRM really doesn't work.
12/19/08
12/19/08
12/19/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
"Yeah, I steal my computers, and if I like them maybe I'll buy one. If only there was a way to pay the systems engineer directly."
So who are the "artists" who should get paid for movies? The actors who are already overpaid to begin with? Should all the other people in the credits not get paid, from gaffer to bookkeeping, since they're not artists?
And to answer "how is this good for consumers?" The main benefit is if movie companies can make a profit, they'll keep making movies which ensures a stream of new movies for consumers, just as computer company profits ensure a stream of new computers.
I'm not saying it's good in any way to limit the use of any movie you buy in any way. If you buy it it should work on everything everywhere. But the idea that pirating is the answer, as if pirates run around buying things they like (if you do you're one in a trillion), belies that fact that without movie companies there'd be no movies.
As Chuck Norris has said many times: "without angels there'd be no rainbows, which is why I buy my angels rather than pirate them."
11/18/08
11/18/08
Take your DRM and shove it, Apple.
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08
11/18/08