Yes. My 200 lb. HDTV still works. And if it didn't, I wouldn't care. I have enough DVDs and video games to last me until analog television becomes a niche market that caters to bespectacled bearded videophiles to bore everyone within earshot with arguments of how analog television just looks warmer.
@ethanlechcharles: Analog TV is so much better. Adjusting the rabbit ears and vertical hold was part of the TV watching experience. I would rather watch "All In The Family" or "Taxi" than the made-for-the-masses TV that the big conglomerates put out nowadays.
TV back then was about making a statement; now it's just about making money. You haven't lived until you've watched the Immaculate Reception on a 19" Zenith in an original wood cabinet. With the color skewed a little towards cyan, you can practically taste the Schlitz. All it needs is a gas crisis. Football on a 60" plasma just doesn't compare.
@Kaiser-Machead: It's a technical term. That white noise added vibrancy to the broadcast. Plus, the color bleed added something that just can't be quantified.
There's a part of it that most people nowadays can't appreciate. Sure, digital TV gives you a "sharper" picture and you get stuff like 5.1 surround but you're missing out on so much more. Like adjusting the fine-tune dial to really tune in a station. Or, having to switch the top knob to "U" to get the UHF stations. There are people who don't even know what UHF is. And you don't even get knobs on TVs now.
You show someone still in high school an analog TV and I'll bet you they wouldn't even know how to turn it on, more or less how to get the news from Walter Cronkite.
@OMG! Ponies!: i have to admit you are right on this one Ponies!. there are certain qualities in an old set that you can't find with HD these days. i, for one, would only hook my atari up to an old bunny eared, dual knobbed, UHF lovin' TV saved from some old motel somwhere to achieve the full effect the designers intended. any other TV would be like puttin leaded gas in a new prius.
@OMG! Ponies!: But you fail to mention the joy in placing foil tips on the antenae to maximize your viewing experience. And when the "clicker" actually clicked!
yeah my TV, as far as i know, has been sitting on its lazy ass 24/7 since it was born. it spent some time laying down getting plugged the other day - again, lazy lazy lazy. didn't even push back when i was plugging it.
the problem is that the skinny ones are always high maintenance. that's why i always go for TV's that are in good shape, but maybe have a little chub on em. there's less competition, and they dont make the rest of my appliances look ugly by comparison.
oh but they DO have to be black, and willing to accept multiple inputs simultaneously, and must be cool enough to let my friends watch, too. that's just how i roll.
Well, I am too poor to afford cable, but I have a DTV converter box and rabbit ears. I was only able to get 1 channel before the transition, but now I get...NONE! So, yeah, my TV is now just a useless waste of space that does nothing, as compared to the useless waste of space that was occasionally entertaining before...
I'm an old person and I'm not giving up the rabbit ears. They provide the reception to our converter box, at least till my old husband puts up the outside antenna he's been talking about for 15 years.
@hostile17: Indeed. Been watching digital channels on satellite, cable and broadcast tv in the UK for years now. It's kind of bizarre seeing some people having some sort of meltdown, or get confused over it, but I guess I understand that things are just different sometimes.
On a subject that's been mentioned in some other comments, it's true, some channels often look horrifically pixelated when you transition from analogue to digital, but that's not because of the method, it's because of the poor compression, equipment and recordings kept by some channels in a cost-cutting measure. Sometimes there's a show on Sky that just looks AWFUL because it's a poor copy, same with many other channels, but if it's a poor copy, I'll just change the channel and watch it elsewhere some other time.
Analog > Digital. See that picture you posted up there? Ya, that's about the quality difference. Before, I would get clear pictures with the occasional snow. Now I get the same picture with regular channel death. I even got an inline signal amp, and the channel that was clearest before is now impossible to wat 9/10 times I try to see it.
Its kind of a sad day. Think of all the history and all that has come before. Its truly the end of an era. I'll forever miss the local TV of the late 70's and 80's with monster movies, cartoons, and all manner of weirdness on the airwaves. Those days are long gone, but this is that final death knell to a time we'll never see again.
@Who Shot Who in the What Now?: Really? B/c I have gout myself. What did you take? Was it laying on of hands? B/c I'd let him touch me if it would stop all the pain when I have a flare/swell up.
@theeraserhead: Why post this twice? Obama is the leader of the free world and I doubt you could go a week without saying his name in a positive or negative light.
@Nathan Trumbull: I don't say his name. I use PresBO. Also, and I know this is said for all Presidents, but isn't it a tad egotistical to call the US the leader of the free world? I mean, yeah, we're a powerful nation, but that kind of falls right in with out World Police package.
@OMG! Con Seannery!: While I agree with you, last week I was told multiple times that since the US Government didn't fund a certain type of stem cell research for 8 years, it prevented the entire world from doing any research and/or coming up with any treatments. So yes, they do control the world!
@dave the wet sprocket: It was actually "Flavor-Aid" used in Jonestown. People who say Kool-Aid are being racist as it's a stereotype that African Americans drink Kool-Aid. [www.google.com]
@SupremeCourtNominee_GitEmSteveDave: Actually that's not true, because while the U.S. banned said research, a lot of the researchers carried on their research in other countries that hadn't banned it, including in the U.K..
It's now part of the conservative argument against resuming said research, putting forward the notion that research into stem cells has reached such a point that the formerly banned kind of research is backward and something of an archaism.
@Cjay79: Shhhhhh. You're talking crazy. Science and everything was delayed at least a decade by the Bush administration. It's main stream knowledge. There's no room for your "facts" in it. Or at least that's what I was told: [gizmodo.com]
But yeah, thank you for showing me there are people out there who realize we aren't the center of the universe. You made me have a little more faith.
06/13/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
We all know the noise adds life to the image. DTV is so flat and lifeless. You'd be better off watching nothing without a $1000+ DA converter.
06/12/09
TV back then was about making a statement; now it's just about making money. You haven't lived until you've watched the Immaculate Reception on a 19" Zenith in an original wood cabinet. With the color skewed a little towards cyan, you can practically taste the Schlitz. All it needs is a gas crisis. Football on a 60" plasma just doesn't compare.
06/12/09
06/12/09
There's a part of it that most people nowadays can't appreciate. Sure, digital TV gives you a "sharper" picture and you get stuff like 5.1 surround but you're missing out on so much more. Like adjusting the fine-tune dial to really tune in a station. Or, having to switch the top knob to "U" to get the UHF stations. There are people who don't even know what UHF is. And you don't even get knobs on TVs now.
You show someone still in high school an analog TV and I'll bet you they wouldn't even know how to turn it on, more or less how to get the news from Walter Cronkite.
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
Ohh nostalgia why are you such a heartless shrew?
06/12/09
06/12/09
yeah my TV, as far as i know, has been sitting on its lazy ass 24/7 since it was born. it spent some time laying down getting plugged the other day - again, lazy lazy lazy. didn't even push back when i was plugging it.
06/12/09
I got a Wii and Wii Fit. My 200 lb. television had the audacity to call me overweight. Like that Wide Load was one to talk.
And yes, HDTV, you are fat. You're not widescreen; you're not 16:9; you're not a WEGA. YOU ARE FAT, YOU LOUSY CRT BEHEMOTH!
06/12/09
the problem is that the skinny ones are always high maintenance. that's why i always go for TV's that are in good shape, but maybe have a little chub on em. there's less competition, and they dont make the rest of my appliances look ugly by comparison.
oh but they DO have to be black, and willing to accept multiple inputs simultaneously, and must be cool enough to let my friends watch, too. that's just how i roll.
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
word to the red faction action!
06/12/09
Yeah, we also have cable.
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
+1 Insightful
Wait... um, no.
06/12/09
No, we won't ALL be moving over.
Americans will.
You know, the internets (and Gizmodo) is available to everyone you know?
06/12/09
On a subject that's been mentioned in some other comments, it's true, some channels often look horrifically pixelated when you transition from analogue to digital, but that's not because of the method, it's because of the poor compression, equipment and recordings kept by some channels in a cost-cutting measure. Sometimes there's a show on Sky that just looks AWFUL because it's a poor copy, same with many other channels, but if it's a poor copy, I'll just change the channel and watch it elsewhere some other time.
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
Do a little research, and I'm sure you'll discover somewhere along the line, that you're a dip-shit.
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
If you don't like it, THEN YOU CAN GEEEEET OUT!!!!
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
Get over yourself.
Don't post things twice.
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
It's now part of the conservative argument against resuming said research, putting forward the notion that research into stem cells has reached such a point that the formerly banned kind of research is backward and something of an archaism.
06/12/09
But yeah, thank you for showing me there are people out there who realize we aren't the center of the universe. You made me have a little more faith.