dongfeng21 - Gizmodo

posts about #dongfeng21 more →
New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go

Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

Dsmvwl Admin Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×

Jesse in Japan
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
Does this missile actually work? At mach ten and flying low, there would be a lot of chances for it to just crash into the sea.
Reply

Jesse in Japan was starred Jesse in Japan was unstarred

apeguero
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
I don't know man. See, I really did like good 'ol Billy as a president. Funny guy. Warming guy. But whenever I see stuff like this, it just kind'a pisses me off a bit. See, there was this deal with Doral back in the mid '90s between them and Chinese and a satellite. Well, you know, there was also the missile technology deal between them cleared by the Clinton Administration.

Now, seriously, had the Clinton administration not given this technology to them (for campaign money), then who knows, maybe Monkey Boy (Curious George), would've done it. I don't know, maybe, maybe not. Or maybe President BO (not Body Odor) would've gifted it to them (or given it to them as a monthly payment of our gigantic debt). Or maybe the Chinese could have bought the technology from the Russians or North Koreans or Iranians. Either case, we would've been ahead of them. But to just give them tech which they had a hard time figuring out on their own for just 100k is beyond stupid! Besides, who's to say North Korea and Iran didn't get this missile guidance tech from China (who got it from us for 100k)?

Read the Wired article. They do a better (non-partisan) way of explaining what I'm talking about.

[www.wired.com]
Reply

apeguero was starred apeguero was unstarred

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

@apeguero: What does/do Doral Cigarettes have to do with Bill Clinton, the Chinese, and satellites? Are they putting chemicals in the smokes? I do have to admit that they are a smooth smoke with the flavor and value Americans have come to enjoy.
Reply

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@WindySaturday_GitEmSteveDave: China wanted to claim the title of "Budget Flavor Country"...
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
Can this REALLY make it past the Phallanx C-WIZ system on most modern US military ships? You are talking about a system that uses radar to guide a gatling gun firing 3-4,000 rpm of depleted uranium shells, which is HIGHLY mobile, to shred an incoming missle.
Reply

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

@WindySaturday_GitEmSteveDave: Damn, it's actually CIWS.

It's for when you care enough to send a wall of metal at someone.
Reply

fuzz54
04/06/09

@WindySaturday_GitEmSteveDave: A missile going mach 10 would be over the horizon and onto the ship in about 10 to 15 seconds. Not much time, especially if there's more than one missile inbound.
Reply

fuzz54 was starred fuzz54 was unstarred

sqeakytoy of the apocalypse
04/06/09

@WindySaturday_GitEmSteveDave: well the phalanx part was right anyway. I have always had a soft spot for rapidly moving walls of hot, depleted uranium death.
Reply

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

@fuzz54: I seriously doubt this is coming in low at mach 10. The amount of fuel it would have to carry in order to maintain that speed would be large. Also, at that speed, you can not be that maneuverable. One you start changing direction at mach speeds, you can start an instability that can bring it down, and being so close to the ground, it would crash. I think this missile starts with a traditional ballistic arc, but as it falls, it moves then, and utilizes it's spinning and gravity to ensure it remains stable. If this is the fact, than the gun would work, b/c unlike a anti-missile missile, this gun can alter it's aiming point, and quickly.

@daveNYC: The phallanx system shreds the inbound until it explodes itself. So the majority of the impact would be spread out. Unless China starts using mass drivers......
Reply

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@sqeakytoy of the apocalypse: Then you'd love the naval version of the metal storm that is in early development...

Sorry, don't have a link handy...
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

Maury Markowitz
04/06/09

@sqeakytoy of the apocalypse:

@WindySaturday_GitEmSteveDave: well the phalanx part was right anyway. I have always had a soft spot for rapidly moving walls of hot, depleted uranium death.

Would that "soft spot" be what's left of your lungs and liver after you ingest some? DU is flammable, and when it cooks up it turns into a seriously nasty heavy metal cloud. Heavy metal as in "would you like some mercury with that"?

DU should be illegal, and is in many places. The only reason they use it is because it's cheaper than tungsten (which is a way better penetrator). In a world of $500 toilet seats, this is one place where a little over-budgeting would be appreciated.

Maury
Reply

Maury Markowitz was starred Maury Markowitz was unstarred

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

@Maury Markowitz: I will make sure that is a CIWS ever fires at me, I won't inhale. That make ya happy?
Reply

rte148
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
A quasiballistic missile (also called a semiballistic missile) is a category of missile that has a low trajectory and/or is largely ballistic but can perform manoeuvres in flight or make unexpected changes in direction and range.

At a lower trajectory than a ballistic missile, a quasiballistic missile can maintain higher speed, thus allowing its target less time to react to the attack, at the cost of reduced range.

Missiles that combine a maneuverable reentry vehicle (MaRV) with a terminal guidance system, allowing them to adjust the flight path as they near their target, are thought to be under development in China for use as anti-ship ballistic missiles.
Reply

rte148 was starred rte148 was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@rte148: Somehow with a quasi- or semi- out front it just isn't as scary...
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

yogibimbi
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
Shouldn't it be schlong feng? And is that the same feng as in feng shui? Maybe Dong Feng translated means 'suck on that, dumbass', or something like that...
Reply

yogibimbi was starred yogibimbi was unstarred

Charles Ip
04/06/09

@yogibimbi: Dong feng translates into East Wind. Us Chinese like to name stuff after stuff like that.
Reply

Charles Ip was starred Charles Ip was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@Charles Ip: Darn, and I was so hoping that based on yogibimbis translation Feng Shui would mean "Dumbass Decorating".
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

not_a_virus.exe.vbs
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
Is that Mach 10 an actual figure?
Reply

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

@Life Is Eat And Die: well, they can't technically achieve Mach 10 unless Q intervenes.
Reply

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@WindySaturday_GitEmSteveDave: They would need Speed Racer to pilot it to realistically achieve that sort of speed.
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

not_a_virus.exe.vbs
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
My Dong Feng is much bigger.
Reply

Mac the Tard
04/06/09

@Life Is Eat And Die: Finally... a dick joke... Damn, I thought I accidentally went to the wrong site.
Reply

Mac the Tard was starred Mac the Tard was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@bleuray vs. honeydijondvd: Did I just see a fart joke as a response to a dick joke... That's a little, uh... Flamboyant...
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

xenoastro
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
about time somebody kicked some US butt !, but this is another reason for the US to enlarge their military budget to counterattack this, so they can still say how great and invincible they are.
Reply

xenoastro was starred xenoastro was unstarred

sqeakytoy of the apocalypse
04/06/09

@xenoastro: Bite my great big white American ass, and suck it.

and that's all there is to say about that.
Reply

qbrad
04/06/09

@sqeakytoy of the apocalypse: Ah yes, the old "bite and suck" procedure... Classic.
Reply

qbrad was starred qbrad was unstarred

czetie
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
One nit (yeah, I'm "that guy"): It can't both be a "ballistic missile" and have "high maneuverability". By definition, a ballistic missile is in free-fall after it's initial burn. Is it actually some kind of cruise missile?
Reply

czetie was starred czetie was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@czetie: oh, oh, its magic!
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

WaffleTeamStrike! v26.00
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
Bologna is right. If anyone thinks that we would allow the Chinese to sink and expensive super carrier you should think twice. These days a super carrier costs around US$4.5-6 Billion to make and over US$160 million just to operate. The US has tech that can own this missle for sure, no way around it.
Reply

weatherman
04/06/09

@WaffleTeamStrike: I don't disagree with your conclusion, but you're reasoning is questionable. You can't just dismiss other countries developments because "the US wouldn't let that happen" or (to paraphrase) "if they have that, we must have something that can beat it."

US military dominance is by no means assured. And disruptive technologies come along all the time - we've been working on anti-missile missiles for more than 30 years and we still can't reliably defeat an ICBM. Hitting a bullet with a bullet isn't as easy as some would like you to believe.
Reply

weatherman was starred weatherman was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@weatherman: But hitting a bullet with a half million bullets changes the odds quite a bit (a la metal storm).
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

Irish_Knight
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
[en.wikipedia.org]
Reply

Irish_Knight was starred Irish_Knight was unstarred

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

@Irish_Knight: Are going to name your first son "DipShit" Knight? I mean, what did he think a secret phase congigent tracking system is for?
Reply

czetie
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
On the one hand: that is a terrifying weapon. If it works as advertised, it could do for the age of the carrier battlegroup what the carrier did for the age of the destroyer. The answer to a missile like this is to keep your major assets over the horizon, and control the battlefield with a blizzard of small remote-controlled drones, which gives the enemy nothing to point their huge Dong at.

On the other hand: if we ever get to the point where we're seriously pointing supercarriers at the Chinese and the Chinese are seriously firing supermissiles back, who sank whose battleship is going to be the least of our worries.
Reply

czetie was starred czetie was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@czetie: This is why the US is developing the metal storm.

If you can lay out a 2sq. mi. patch of sky that is heavily contaminated with lead (in about 1 sec), something entering that space at mach 10 wouldn't stand much of a chance...
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

tharden33
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
Bologna. Lockheed Martin already has laser systems that can neutralize missiles in mid-air. I don't think I've ever seen a missile that can travel faster than a laser.
Reply

tharden33 was starred tharden33 was unstarred

Jesus Diaz
04/06/09

@tharden33: False. Lockheed Martin doesn't have any system like that in place. For a laser to have any effect, like the airborne laser which is still in development, missiles would have to have a parabolic steady trajectory. Lasers won't take this down. Other things may.

Stop watching Star Wars.
Reply

Jesus Diaz was starred Jesus Diaz was unstarred

Mr.V.
04/06/09

@tharden33:

Why not shoot another missile at it? :P
Reply

Mr.V. was starred Mr.V. was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@tharden33: China really just wants to show up North Korea...
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
04/06/09

@tharden33: Well, if a missile traveled faster than a laser, and thus, faster than light, would you be able to see it? I mean, the missile would hit you before the light it reflects hits your eye. Unless it's time traveling then....
Reply

Nirach
04/06/09

@ItsRabid: You mean, like the THAAD system?
Reply

Nirach was starred Nirach was unstarred

KaitouKID
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
I'm surprised Ms. Elaine "I hate China" Chow didn't post this as some fear mongering article.

Bravo Jesus! You present the facts with some humor and no bullshit stereotypical fear mongering for kicks.
Reply

KaitouKID was starred KaitouKID was unstarred

mocanlagunas
04/06/09

@KaitouKID: well, if they have the capability of sinking aircraft carriers (how many countries have those?), doesn't that mongers some fear into you?
Reply

mocanlagunas was starred mocanlagunas was unstarred

IN THE FACE!
04/06/09

@mocanlagunas: If I was on an aircraft carrier it would.
Reply

IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred

TheCrudMan
04/06/09

In reply to New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go
Well it could be worse, it could be more than 2,000 km.
Reply

TheCrudMan was starred TheCrudMan was unstarred

Mac the Tard
04/06/09

@TheCrudMan: Or...

It could be a 2,000 kilometer long new super-weapon with a warhead powerful enough to blow up the whole planet in a single strike
Reply

Mac the Tard was starred Mac the Tard was unstarred

Mac the Tard
04/06/09

@bleuray vs. honeydijondvd: Or...

a $2,000 hooker capable of blowing me with a single suck.
Reply

Mac the Tard was starred Mac the Tard was unstarred

DontFeedTheTrolls
04/06/09

@bleuray vs. honeydijondvd: Srsly? Man, they just let anyone through the Comment gates these days...
Reply

DontFeedTheTrolls was starred

Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

#dongfeng21

Gizmodo

Gizmodo Team

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo

New Chinese Missile Can Destroy US Supercarrier in One Go

Login

Reset Password

Register

Submit Your Comment