Well, either it will work and Boeing has a new technology lead over Airbus in building/designing efficient aircraft. Or, it doesn't and the company fails.
That's pretty much how it works right? I wish they were a bit more open and honest about the delays, but at least they aren't willing to put a product into production with known design flaws.
Last I knew the A380 was still having major electrical issues.
As someone who works in QA, I'm more than happy to cut anyone some slack for a delay caused by needing to improve design based on test failures. This is exactly WHY testing is important! I don't know about the rest of the Gizmodo readership, but I personally would rather have a safe plane arrive late, then get a plane on time that randomly decides to pop when pressurized during a flight.
I also believe that while setting a release date is a good thing internally to give everyone a definate deadline, people really, really need to stop telling them to the public before they've determined if it's a realistic goal.
@Skunky: Well, then you should know how often problems are in fact uncovered in late QA testing. The difference is, this is an untested and unproven airliner that they want to stuff with passengers. Not just a mundane consumer good. Nobody cares really if a faulty item gets on the store shelf just recall and fix it. But a fault with this airliner could kill hundreds of people.
Making planes out metal is well understood. The issues and risks are know. What Boeing is doing here -and which they admit has inherent flaws- is throwing away all that knowledge in favor of a whole new way. That's nice. But lives are at stake.
@LastError: 100% true, which is why it bothers me that they would say "it's due at such 'n such a time" when they themselves can't fully predict the outcome. Just crank on it and make it ready when it's ready, nobody wants to miss something because they're in a rush.
That's the problem with being advanced and trying to do things in a new way. Sometimes they don't work out quite right when they're expected to. And it's not like Boeing's going to notice a gadget blog snarking about it, but it IS a little tiresome to hear.
@irfan: True, but not take off. It wouldn't have enough thrust. A plane can continue to remain aloft if one engine dies, or if both die and Sully is aboard.
Give it a rest. It'll fly when it's ready. Techinically it COULD fly now, the issue is that the structural integrety isn't up to Boeing's own standards which are much higher than the FAA's. They're not going ahead with flight testing because the data they'd get would be useless for tests they do after the fix. They know what they need to fix and how to fix it, its mostly a supply line issue at this point that will set it back an extra few months. The fact is the airlines don't really care right now because they don't have the cash to pay for them right now anyway so they can ride out the delays without bitching, and then not only get them when they're ready, they can tell Boeing to cough up some compensation for the delay.
08/27/09
08/27/09
That's pretty much how it works right? I wish they were a bit more open and honest about the delays, but at least they aren't willing to put a product into production with known design flaws.
Last I knew the A380 was still having major electrical issues.
08/27/09
I also believe that while setting a release date is a good thing internally to give everyone a definate deadline, people really, really need to stop telling them to the public before they've determined if it's a realistic goal.
Man I phail at teh speelingz.
08/27/09
08/27/09
Making planes out metal is well understood. The issues and risks are know. What Boeing is doing here -and which they admit has inherent flaws- is throwing away all that knowledge in favor of a whole new way. That's nice. But lives are at stake.
08/27/09
08/27/09
07/31/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
Hey-O!
07/30/09
07/30/09
@anexanhume aka Flintheart Glomgold: Err, can I get an image upload brotha?
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
07/30/09
06/25/09
06/25/09