Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
12/09/09
12/09/09
Also who retains the rights to the image after submission?
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
And, no, not every shot I've taken was National Geographic worthy, just the one I took of your moms hairy back. It landed me the front cover of their special on the Missing Link.
12/09/09
12/09/09
12/09/09
Anyway, IANAL so this is just so much late night speculation.
12/09/09
03:16 AM
So many people are ignorant of copyrights and are so quick to give away their creative work just for something as meaningless as 10k viewers.
Just because I enter a contest, doesn't mean I want my image spammed across the internets, and double goes for letting dumbshits like @branchan and @Phillip Han use them as backgrounds.
07:39 AM
12/09/09
Because otherwise I'm wrapping my junk in Christmas lights and taking a picture of it.
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
A peg-legged ghost in a grove.
12/08/09
12/08/09
These images, however, are beautiful.
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
All great replies. that had really been annoying me. I do understand now. So if something is recorded at 30fps but played back on a 60hz screen then frames are added in between which makes things look a bit smoother but doesn't change speed of video. On the other hand, take a 1000 fps water drop and play it at 60hz and it looks super slo mo. I think I get it now. Thanks all!
12/07/09
- I'm looking for something that can take videos with very small/shallow depth of field which can be manually and smoothly controlled (dramatic effect). Stuff that the Canon 5D Mark II and apparently the 7D can also do, as seen on these Florent Porta videos:
[xspblog.com]
[xspblog.com]
Are dSLRs the cheapest way to go?
Considering I'm also interested in testing (in the probably distant future) the effects of different lens types on video (and stuff like tilt-shift), unless there's a very cheap camcorder alternative, I'm thinking of selling my Canon XSi to get a 5D Mark II or 7D.
12/07/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
It's not bigger than your head. I can still see traces of an albino with his hair on fire.