<![CDATA[Gizmodo: Dvi]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: Dvi]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/dvi http://gizmodo.com/tag/dvi <![CDATA[ Gefen USB to DVI Adapter Can Handle Up to 6 Monitors ]]> This is not the first time a USB to DVI adapter had come down the pipeline, but the new Gefen adapter can drive an impressive 6 additional displays at 1600X1200 resolution. It is not great for larger monitors by any means, but at only $129 it could be a relatively inexpensive solution. Gefen also notes that it "uses little computer resources" which means that there is at least a chance that this thing won't be a huge processor suck. Additional images after the break.

gefen-usb-dvi-2.jpg
gefen-usb-dvi-3.jpg
[Gefen]

]]>
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:35:08 EDT Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369862&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ HDMI Wins the Other Format War, Sorry DVI ]]> Anyone with newer displays has heard about DVI and HDMI connections. That's because DVI (Digitial Visual Interface) and HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) both pretty much do the same thing, transmitting digital hi def+ pictures to TVs and monitors. But HDMI, which can carry surround sound audio along with that pretty image in a single cord, appears to have won the battle.

According to analyst firm In-Stat, the DVI interface will drop from 112 million shipped products in 2007 to just 3 million shipped products by 2011. And that number is really startling when you realize that HDMI will be included in 143 million shipped products this year alone. That number includes 90% of digital TVs on the market.

So for those looking for the easiest compatibility going into the future, go with HDMI products. For those with DVI in their home theater infrastructures, HDMI to DVI converters are a simple solution. [extremetech]

]]>
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:13:16 EST Mark Wilson http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350530&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Giz Explains: DisplayPort Set to Invade PC Monitors Everywhere ]]> As if we needed another display standard, along comes DisplayPort, approved last year and just about to sally forth on graphics cards and monitors everywhere. WTF do we need another standard for, anyway? Bandwidth, that's why. DisplayPort (plug pictured above at left, next to a dual-link DVI connector) can handle a maximum 10.8Gb per second, carries 8 channels of digital audio as well as all that video, and has a bidirectional auxiliary channel that can also handle 1Mb per second. That's a lot of data. It could turn out to be a reliable, fast and easy-to-use bridge between computers and home theater displays. But DisplayPort is not all sweetness and light.

A touted aspect of DisplayPort is its "security," comforting to those who create content but an unwelcome guest for those who can't stand even the thought of DRM (digital rights management). Carrying HDCP along with it, the standard is designed to protect content from those free-copying, eyepatch-wearing pirates. In addition to that, it also carries an additional DRM can of worms, DPCP (DisplayPort Content Protection).

That gives the standard an advantage over DVI in the eyes of content creators, who have sometimes been known to arm-twist various hardware manufacturers. Speaking of which, the standard has gotten rousing support from many of the usual suspects, including Dell, HP, Philips, Samsung, Intel and Lenovo, and also graphics cards manufacturers AMD and NVIDIA.

Those companies might like this standard better than HDMI for another reason, too: Unlike HDMI, DisplayPort's an open standard with no fees required to those who invented it. Other than that, besides the slight bandwidth advantage of DisplayPort, the two are almost the same and will be interchangable in some cases with an adapter. But not all cases. Such as...

What do we like about it? You can daisy chain multiple 2560x1600 monitors together, and the standard also supports fiber optic cable, able to blast tons of serious bandwidth for longer distances. It also has an advantage over DVI with its 15-meter spec length, compared with DVI's measly 5-meter recommended distance. We're also quite fond of that ability to support 16-bit color for each component, and hey, the damn thing is easier to connect than a DVI or VGA cable. With Dell and ATI first out of the gate, expect graphics cards and monitors to jump on board any day now. [DisplayPort Info Guide]

]]>
Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:30:00 EST Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=340621&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ All Giz Wants: One Plug For Everything ]]> all-giz-wants.jpgCome with us into the world of fantasy, where there's just one kind of plug and its associated cable that will work for every electronic device. What we would like to see is one cable that carries audio, video and power to or from whatever device you need to use. It needs to be small, it needs to have tremendous bandwidth (perhaps using fiber optics), and it needs to be smart enough not to ruin anything you plug it into. It sure would beat the alphabet soup we have to deal with now.

Think about it: you need an HDMI cable for your home theater equipment that carries audio as well as video, but now there's a new cable on the way called DisplayPort specifically made for computer displays. Or maybe you'd like to hook up your TV to your computer via VGA. Then there's the old-timey composite, component, and S-video connections.

Not digital enough for you? Let's use DVI, or if you want higher resolution, you'll need dual-link DVI. Then there's digital audio, connecting via fiber optic that can't even decide whether it's called Toslink or the eloquent S/PDIF. Or maybe choose a coaxial connector for your digital audio, the same as an RCA plug used to connect analog audio, not that cable TV variety of coaxial.

Want to connect hard drives? You could use USB 2.0, or FireWire 400 is just about as fast. Want FireWire 800? Oops, you'll need a different cable for that. What about the new FireWire 3200? Yep, it'll need new cable, too. Connecting faster SATA hard drives isn't simple, either, because if you want to hook them up internally, you'll need an "L" connector, but if you want to use the external SATA drives (eSATA), well, those use in an "I" connector, to keep you from using unshielded wires inside a PC. The confusion goes on and on.

Oh, and by the way, while you're dealing with this Tower of Babel, you'll have to sidestep all the ripoff artists trying to charge you ten times as much for a cable that does exactly the same thing as its cheapest counterpart.

It's a mess. Please, someone round up all the consumer electronics manufacturers, and somehow make them all use the same connectors. But that's like herding cats. We told you we were going into the world of fantasy, but anyway, that's All Giz Wants.

]]>
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:15:00 EST Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335155&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ USB to DVI Adapter Expands Screen Space Without Adding Video Cards ]]> The idea of driving a DVI or VGA display with a USB adapter isn't new, but Sewell's latest adapter seems to be fairly cheap and useful. Their adapter costs $119 and has 128MB RAM on board, which is then powered by USB ports from your computer to drive a 1600x1200 resolution monitor at the same time as your standard monitors. Sewell claims that these USB-driven monitors have the same quality as standard DVI monitors at displays of up to 20-inches. If you're trying to power anything bigger, like a 22 or a 24-inch, you're better off getting a new video card anyway. Unless you're on a laptop, in which case you're boned. [Sewell via Sewell]

]]>
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:40:23 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316944&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ WID101 Makes Monitors Wireless ]]> WID101.jpgYou've got a wireless keyboard, wireless mouse and wireless speakers, so why are you still connecting to your monitor with a cable? What are you, some kind of luddite? You need a wireless monitor connector, like the new WID101 from Teq Gear. This device connects the DVI port on your PC to the one on your monitor over an encrypted 802.11 a. g or b network, squishing the video data down to fit. It'll run at resolutions up to WXGA (1366 by 768 pixels; good enough for a 17-inch LCD screen) and will set you back $995.

WID101 [TeqGear]

]]>
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:23:56 EDT gizmodocontributor http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=210503&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ BenQ FP222W 22-Inch Widescreen Monitor ]]> benqfp222w.jpgBenQ's 22-inch widescreen LCD monitor, baptized as the FP222W, is set to hit store sometime this month and brings with it a series of features that make it more than just a pretty face (or bezel, as the case may be). It tops out at a resolution of 1680x1050 pixels and its 5ms response time ensures that you're not sitting on your big Gaming Chair looking at trails and blurs. BenQ's thrown in their proprietary Senseye technology, which is supposed to "automatically and dramatically" improve image quality, kind of like beer goggles.

The FP222W has two types of inputs, D-Sub and DVI. DVI would've been noteworthy two or three years ago, the lack of HDMI is somewhat surprising. Not because it's any better, but because it's newer; we need the latest and greatest, regardless of improvements in quality.

Though BenQ's latest monitor is due this month, there's still no word on how much coin it'll cost you.

BenQ launch new 22-inch wide-Screen LCD Monitor (FP222W) [Crowdedbrain]

BenQ Home Page [BenQ]

]]>
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:51:03 EDT Gizloco http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=199730&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fiber Optic HDMI Cable ]]> dvigear_1909_40515092.jpegWhen digital ain't good enough to transfer your AV, you might as well get all wonky and tranfer it using pure light. Once the digital signal is translated by a fiber optic converter, it's immune to signal noise. That means they can run up to 100 meters, without a problem. One problem, however, is the price. With swappable HDMI/DVI ends, the cable runs $550 for a 10 meter batch. Brothers and sisters, you don't want to know how much the 100 meter cable is.

Fiber Optic HDMI Cable [DVIGear via Audioholics]


]]>
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:56:12 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=198627&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gefen DVI-3000HD ]]>  - GizmodoNeed to transmit USB, HD video, and serial over six miles of fiber optic cable? Sure! We all do! The DVI-3000 HD delivers 1280x1024 pixel video with HDCP compliance and costs $1,999.

While we can't quite figure out why you'd want to do this—maybe wiring up a campus for video?—we'd love to transmit video to Staten Island from our home here in Brooklyn.

Product Page[Gefen]

]]>
Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:14:13 EDT johnb http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=179692&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Quixun QHD-M30W 30-Incher: Look Out Dell and Apple ]]> qui_30incher.jpgSuddenly Dell and Apple don't have a lock on the huge honking LCD display market any more, because now Japanese company Quixun introduces the QHD-M30W, a 30-incher that matches the resolution of the Apple and Dell 30-inch monitors at 2560x1600.

Just like its competitors, the M30W has a dual-link DVI-D connector, requiring an industrial-strength graphics card to handle its zillions of pixels. Price will be $1728, undercutting Dell's monitor ($2199) by $471 and Apple's ($2499) by $771. There's no word yet on availability in the US, but even if it's not on sale anytime soon, this announcement is bound to put pricing pressure on Dell and Apple.

Product Page (Japanese) [Quixun, via Akihabara News]

]]>
Fri, 26 May 2006 11:17:13 EDT Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=176590&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gefen HD Mate 23 ]]>  - GizmodoThis strange little box allows you to run two component and one DVI source to your 23" Apple Cinema display. That's right—that's all this $298.95 box does. Plus it has an iPod scroll wheel on the front. Essentially, you can use your big, sexy, expensive display to play XBox 360 or watch up to 1080i content. [Thanks, Sam]

Product Page [SewellDirect]

]]>
Mon, 08 May 2006 17:38:11 EDT johnb http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=172271&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Acer Aspire 9800 to be Second Laptop to Eventually Have an HD DVD Drive ]]> acer_aspire_9800.jpgAcer took its place in line behind Toshiba to say it will release an HD DVD-packing laptop, the Aspire 9800. This is going to be one unusual notebook, with a whopping 20.1-inch 1680x1050 LCD. The thing is loaded for video of all types, including a 1.3-megapixel webcam, and both analog and digital TV tuners feeding that big display. It's also HDCP compliant, with a DVI port in the back to hook up to an HDTV. Acer hedged on that HD DVD drive, though, mentioning that the laptop will initially ship in May with a DVD burner, and wouldn't say when the HD DVD drive would be a part of the spec list.

Although it's great the notebook will have such a huge screen, we're puzzled at that oddball 1680x1050 resolution, frustratingly short of 1080p which will eventually be the lingua franca of HD DVD. And, at that big screen size, anything short of 1920x1200 is not what we would call state-of-the-art. Oh, well. Can't have it all.

Acer unveils world's second HD DVD laptop [Reg Hardware]

]]>
Fri, 07 Apr 2006 10:23:13 EDT Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165793&view=rss&microfeed=true