it's amazing they have any blood left. after picking up nextel (stupidest acquisition ever?) i thought they had basically bitten the proverbial bullet. in the spirit of competition, here's to sprint leaving that cyanide capsule in the vault and continuing to battle *raises glass for a toast* #earnings
@back_at_it: Nextel wasn't a bad acquisition--Nextel had the highest ARPU in the industry. Sprint just let the Nextel assets go to hell and never made any effort to integrate the Nascar-crowd into its mainstream offerings. #earnings
I don't get it. All these reports on Sprint I've seen lately put it 2nd (behind Verizon) with AT&T and T-Mobile neck and neck for last place, yet Sprint is hurting badly and AT&T just activated over 4 million new phones. Granted 3/4 of those were for the iPhone, but even without it, AT&T still wouldn't be hurting as bad as Sprint, who's getting better marks than AT&T. Just doesn't make sense to me.
I know I'll never get Sprint because their signal doesn't penetrate the walls of my work, while I get a signal with AT&T everywhere. #earnings
@€hЯ!§: According to Chetan Sharma, Q2 data for 2009 puts Sprint at #3 with 18% of US subs. Verizon leads with 32% followed closely by AT&T at 29%. T-Mobile is #4 with 12% and the remaining 9% is divided among a boatload of carriers including US Cellular, MetroPCS, LEAP and others. #earnings
I am very impressed with their lineup of phones. They went from Verizon to Orange Telecom in a matter of a year. We have the latest and greatest, including BB's and Android. Well done, Sprint. Now, if I know you have WiMax, but... Could I show you this little thing called LTE??? #earnings
@Alfisted: I just want the freaking phones to stay mainstream. WiMax will force every Sprint phone to be different from every other phone on the planet just to work in 4G. STUPID. Course, this may not be true, LTE and WiMax being so closely related that a Sprint 4G phone might be able to use a LTE signal... Dunno, just a thought. #earnings
Bring on the black Wii. It's just a fresh look to increase sales.
But lets be honest the future of console gaming is HD content and online gaming. It's all about social networking and being able to connect to people all over. The Wii lacks in both categories by comparison.
The Wii is a one-trick pony that's on its last leg, especially with Natal and PS3 motion controllers coming in 2010. #wii
I consider myself a gaming fanboy. I have no preference for one system over another [as I have defended the 360 when all of my friends prefer the PS3, and I have defended the PS3 when everyone else has a 360]. However I noticed most gamers despise the Wii, as if they feel threatened. Personally, I think it's because of the ratio between bad games and good games on the Wii [with the rule that for every good game on the Wii, there's 10 bad games].
That being said, for any criticisms people may have for the Wii... it's not a horrible console. It does have good games. The thing is, I don't think those Wii games interest most gamers out there, or gamers just assume anything on the Wii is sub-par. It's just not true. I've enjoyed a ton of games on the Wii. A lot of them are underrated. And I know some of them don't interest 'hardcore gamers'. But that's fine. Everyone has their own tastes.
You can criticize the console for its lack of HD graphics. But don't criticize it for having no good games. If you give some of the games a shot, you might find them quite enjoyable.
That being said.... it was only a matter of time before Nintendo had to do a price cut of their console. With pretty much every other console slashing their prices, I just think it was about right. Regardless, Nintendo is still making ton of profit, and I'm sure they're developing the next console in order to try to maintain their lead. #wii
i think Nintendo just didnt' evolve as I evolved... as a kid I loved NES(i still have mine) and super NES and N64 but... i guess my expectations for systems have changed... its not just about solid gameplay (which gamecube lacked) or competitive graphics (which gamecube and wii lack) but its also the depth of games available (which gamecube and wii lack) and the lack of exclusive titles (now it seems that few titles are exclusive to platforms... but rather exclusive to wii)... until these changes are made.. NES shall be my only nintendo system in my house #wii
@krnplcd: Um.... The GameCube didn't lack graphics compared to the... PS2. Have you seen Resident Evil 4? The thing with the GameCube was the lack of killer exclusives, and a much smaller library. #wii
@W10002: And the inability to play DVDs.
And the fact the controller was terrible.
And the fact it was a purple lunchbox, pushing Nintendo's kiddy image.
And the fact that first party titles also reinforced this image.
And the fact that a lot of those first party titles were pretty lacklustre. #wii
@Thee Sea: I agree with all your points but the controller. The Gamecube controller was awesome compared to the current generation at the time.
The original Xbox controller was for giants with giant hands, and the PS2 controller was just a rehash of the previous uncomfortable controller.
The GC controller was ergonomic and had a good selection of button and sticks. My only complaint was the arrangement of X and Y. #wii
@CrashingX: By the time the gamecube came out the xbox already had the smaller controller shipping with it. Not only that, but people LOVE the dualshock controllers. That's one of the reason there was so much outcry when the design changed for the PS3. #wii
@Thee Sea: UH...What? The GC was released days after the Xbox (GC - Nov 18, Xbox - Nov 15). and technically months before the Xbox if you count its Japan release. Unless Microsoft can see into the future, but apparently only to an extent, I don't think they possibly could've shipped with a smaller controller by the time the GC was release. Basic search would've yielded those dates.
I can't stand the Playstation controllers, and that includes the PS1 and PS2. Uncomfortable to hold and uncomfortable to use. The GC controllers were a masterpiece by comparison.
And did you try some of those first-party exclusives on the Cube? Windwaker? The 2 Prime games? Melee? Animal Crossing? I guess pardon them for stepping outside the box in some cases. I enjoyed those games, but I guess if you want to go back to Final Fantasy: We've Done This Before and FPS: Just Like the Last One then you're more than welcome to.
I realize there may be a tone of fanboyism in this post, but if I enjoyed the console then I should have every right to defend it. #wii
@dp05: Zelda did a lot to prolong the kiddy image. Like it or not, the first thing people notice about games ARE the graphics and Zelda was a cartoon. The 2 prime games while good had a lot of issues stemming from the controls. The GCN controller was horribly suited for the FPS genre which was one of its many issues. As for Melee, it was a VERY rare gem.
Stop putting words in my mouth and let the numbers speak for themselves. The Gamecube was the lowest selling Nintendo console outside of the Virtual Boy for a reason. #wii
Nintendo used to be known for really fun unique games, now their all the same on the wii. Although it supports the game cube controllers (best designed controller ever) you can't play any of the new games with it. Once you realize you don't actually have to get off the couch to play any of the games, the wii looses it's appeal quickly.
I mean you feel dorky enough playing video games in your 30's, but sitting on the couch jerking your hands wildly around while not watching pron or a sporting event is just wrong somehow! #wii
@TreFacTor: It's not just Nintendo's problem. All developers are sucking it up this generation. They're out of ideas and concepts and just keep rehashing everything to stay afloat. These are indeed the dark ages for gaming and while there are good games this generation, the amount of them and the amount of fresh ones is nothing compared to days of old. #wii
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't the PS3 seen a significant increase in sales? According to this post, the 360 is the only console to have done so.... #wii
@PlayerX: There's a recent Gamasutra article showing YTD sales through September for the last 3 years. The 360 was the only one with an increase from 2008 to 2009. But I expect PS3 will fare much better this holiday season. #wii
@Mike Zuniga: That was Unexpected: there are still a few gems on the wii. smash bros brawl, twilight princess, and fire emblem to name a few. it has beena while though since a noteworthy game came out #wii
@heisthejordan: Twilight Princess is better on it's initially intended system. SSBB is also better played on old hardware. Care to name a "gem" that utilizes their great gimmick? Fire Emblem doesn't. (Nor was it a "gem" in my book) #wii
@Mike Zuniga: That was Unexpected: Nintendo made the move to family and casual games. It was a horrible business plan, since the other consoles have casual games as well, and Nintendo was charging too much for casual games and a casual game system.
I think we can all agree that Nintendo hasn't been the same since the N64. The Gamecube was a powerful system for it's time, and had network capabilities, but it was never used to it's full potential. The Wii, on the other hand, has been used to it's potential, and has been found, by many, to be lacking.
But don't expect Nintendo to change their game any time soon. #wii
@Mike Zuniga: Nintendo still cares about the hardcore gamers IMO. It's the lack of third-party support for real games that made me sell my Wii for a 360.
@Wewtaco: You are right that their third-party developer support is terrible, but that is exactly why people don't believe Nintendo cares about hardcore gamers. . . . . Nintendo doesn't make games for hardcore gamers, third-parties do. Therefore, nintendo is neglecting that market. #wii
It's true. Most mobile phone platforms are a pain in the ass to use or just outdated. There isn't an OS out there more simple than the one on the iPhone. Multitasking? Who gives a shit. #apple
uh huh... Mobile OS X can't even multi-task and just got cut and paste, features Android and I *believe* Blackberry OS have had since the beginning. #apple
of course it can multitask - it just doesn't for the sake of performance. jailbreak it and it will do thy bidding. but don't paint it as being 'incapable' of multitasking. #apple
@nutbastard: Uh yea, to the rest of the population who doesn't want to deal with that shit(seriously we all know how easy it is but we clearly are an educated group when it comes to tech), yea the device is incapable of multitasking.
In all seriousness the iphone is way behind in pretty much everything but apps but Kool aid tastes good right?. It's a ballsy statement that has plenty of room for debate. #apple
im sorry but that's semantically incorrect. i think what you mean is, "the vanilla iPhone OS's ability to multitask is disabled by default"
you can't talk about the 'iPhone' as if it's just one thing - it's a combination of hardware and software. to say that the iPhone is incapable of multitasking is just silly, since millions of people are happy owners of multitasking, background-running jailbroken iphones. its capability in the matter shouldn't even be up for debate. That apple cripples it off the line is a valid concern, but no more significant than any other device which has a flaw which is easily rectified on the user end. #apple
An iPhone is "a combination of hardware and software."
The iPhone software disables multitasking by default.
Disable - make unable to perform some action, i.e remove some ability.
Incapable - lacking some ability.
Therefore, the iPhone is incapable of multitasking. Yes, it is possible to turn an iPhone into a "jailbroken iPhone", but that is a distinct subset (or a completely different set really).
Semantics aside - yes, jailbreaking itself is easy, but it's still a PITA to have to jailbreak after every update. So, it's not quite as stress-free as you make it seem. For instance, after each jailbreak, you'd have to reinstall Backgrounder in order to re-enable multi-tasking.
what else matters besides apps? Really?
multi-tasking (all variants, incl. ability to respond to SMS w/o exiting app)
cut & paste and MMS (yay!)
physical keys
video recording
replaceable battery
replaceable memory
quick toggles for 3g, wifi, etc.
customization
sync w/ more than one Exchange server
ability to sync w/ non-iTunes
...
All of these are just personal prefs, but it runs counter to your argument that apps are the only thing that matters. When most people think there are more fart apps than anything else, I doubt apps are perceived as the "scoring points" to the exclusion of everything else.
despite being an extra step, i don't know anyone who's actually done it who classifies jailbreaking as a pain in the ass. that said:
multi-tasking (all variants, incl. ability to respond to SMS w/o exiting app) - addressed by jailbreak
cut & paste and MMS (yay!) - addressed by latest vanilla OS
physical keys - people are split on this, so it's a fair gripe.
video recording - addressed by jailbreak
replaceable battery - fair enough.
replaceable memory - huh? why?
quick toggles for 3g, wifi, etc. - addressed by jailbreak (SBSettings)
customization - addressed by jailbreak (winterboard)
sync w/ more than one Exchange server - fair gripe but affects few people
ability to sync w/ non-iTunes - probably the most valid of your grievances. i'd KILL for drag and drop w/o itunes. #apple
@nutbastard: I wasn't characterizing the jailbreak process as being a PITA. Instead, I was describing the endless update-jailbreak cycle as a pain. This is especially true for those (like me) who haven't looked into how to backup/restore jailbroken apps.
You're right, though. Most of my gripes are addressed by various jailbreak-only apps, which is why I followed through with the aforementioned cycle for some time. I only listed them to illustrate other features which can be considered at least as important as "apps" for some people. And I'm sure many people would like to be able to use these features on the vanilla iPhone, especially since jailbreak apps prove the only limitations are artificial.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not disparaging the iPhone. I love mine - jailbroken or not.
@nutbastard: Being able to multitask with out having to take the risk of messing up your new investment is pretty important to me. Yes like I said it's easy to jailbreak, but try getting support if something goes wrong, well your out of luck aren't you.
And no your football statement is way out of wack clearly the situation is not the same. #apple
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
I know I'll never get Sprint because their signal doesn't penetrate the walls of my work, while I get a signal with AT&T everywhere. #earnings
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
But lets be honest the future of console gaming is HD content and online gaming. It's all about social networking and being able to connect to people all over. The Wii lacks in both categories by comparison.
The Wii is a one-trick pony that's on its last leg, especially with Natal and PS3 motion controllers coming in 2010. #wii
10/29/09
10/29/09
" Its net profit for the past six months fell by 50 percent, almost perfectly matching a near 50 percent drop in Wii sales."
Shrinking profits directly tied to the sales of a single product means that, yes, Nintendo DOES care if you buy a Wii. #wii
10/29/09
10/29/09
That being said, for any criticisms people may have for the Wii... it's not a horrible console. It does have good games. The thing is, I don't think those Wii games interest most gamers out there, or gamers just assume anything on the Wii is sub-par. It's just not true. I've enjoyed a ton of games on the Wii. A lot of them are underrated. And I know some of them don't interest 'hardcore gamers'. But that's fine. Everyone has their own tastes.
You can criticize the console for its lack of HD graphics. But don't criticize it for having no good games. If you give some of the games a shot, you might find them quite enjoyable.
That being said.... it was only a matter of time before Nintendo had to do a price cut of their console. With pretty much every other console slashing their prices, I just think it was about right. Regardless, Nintendo is still making ton of profit, and I'm sure they're developing the next console in order to try to maintain their lead. #wii
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
And the fact the controller was terrible.
And the fact it was a purple lunchbox, pushing Nintendo's kiddy image.
And the fact that first party titles also reinforced this image.
And the fact that a lot of those first party titles were pretty lacklustre. #wii
10/29/09
The original Xbox controller was for giants with giant hands, and the PS2 controller was just a rehash of the previous uncomfortable controller.
The GC controller was ergonomic and had a good selection of button and sticks. My only complaint was the arrangement of X and Y. #wii
10/29/09
10/29/09
I can't stand the Playstation controllers, and that includes the PS1 and PS2. Uncomfortable to hold and uncomfortable to use. The GC controllers were a masterpiece by comparison.
And did you try some of those first-party exclusives on the Cube? Windwaker? The 2 Prime games? Melee? Animal Crossing? I guess pardon them for stepping outside the box in some cases. I enjoyed those games, but I guess if you want to go back to Final Fantasy: We've Done This Before and FPS: Just Like the Last One then you're more than welcome to.
I realize there may be a tone of fanboyism in this post, but if I enjoyed the console then I should have every right to defend it. #wii
10/29/09
Stop putting words in my mouth and let the numbers speak for themselves. The Gamecube was the lowest selling Nintendo console outside of the Virtual Boy for a reason. #wii
10/29/09
I mean you feel dorky enough playing video games in your 30's, but sitting on the couch jerking your hands wildly around while not watching pron or a sporting event is just wrong somehow! #wii
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
I think we can all agree that Nintendo hasn't been the same since the N64. The Gamecube was a powerful system for it's time, and had network capabilities, but it was never used to it's full potential. The Wii, on the other hand, has been used to it's potential, and has been found, by many, to be lacking.
But don't expect Nintendo to change their game any time soon. #wii
10/29/09
And to be quite honest. Wii Sports that ships w/ the Wii is one of the best game collections for the device. Fun-wise if not graphically so.
Also Ghostbusters was fun to play with the motion controller. #wii
10/29/09
10/29/09
10/23/09
10/22/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
of course it can multitask - it just doesn't for the sake of performance. jailbreak it and it will do thy bidding. but don't paint it as being 'incapable' of multitasking. #apple
10/20/09
In all seriousness the iphone is way behind in pretty much everything but apps but Kool aid tastes good right?. It's a ballsy statement that has plenty of room for debate. #apple
10/20/09
10/20/09
im sorry but that's semantically incorrect. i think what you mean is, "the vanilla iPhone OS's ability to multitask is disabled by default"
you can't talk about the 'iPhone' as if it's just one thing - it's a combination of hardware and software. to say that the iPhone is incapable of multitasking is just silly, since millions of people are happy owners of multitasking, background-running jailbroken iphones. its capability in the matter shouldn't even be up for debate. That apple cripples it off the line is a valid concern, but no more significant than any other device which has a flaw which is easily rectified on the user end. #apple
10/20/09
a retarded 12 year old can jailbreak an iPhone.
"iphone is way behind in pretty much everything but apps"
what else matters? that's like saying 'such and such a football team is way behind in pretty much everything but scoring points' #apple
10/20/09
An iPhone is "a combination of hardware and software."
The iPhone software disables multitasking by default.
Disable - make unable to perform some action, i.e remove some ability.
Incapable - lacking some ability.
Therefore, the iPhone is incapable of multitasking. Yes, it is possible to turn an iPhone into a "jailbroken iPhone", but that is a distinct subset (or a completely different set really).
Semantics aside - yes, jailbreaking itself is easy, but it's still a PITA to have to jailbreak after every update. So, it's not quite as stress-free as you make it seem. For instance, after each jailbreak, you'd have to reinstall Backgrounder in order to re-enable multi-tasking.
what else matters besides apps? Really?
multi-tasking (all variants, incl. ability to respond to SMS w/o exiting app)
cut & paste and MMS (yay!)
physical keys
video recording
replaceable battery
replaceable memory
quick toggles for 3g, wifi, etc.
customization
sync w/ more than one Exchange server
ability to sync w/ non-iTunes
...
All of these are just personal prefs, but it runs counter to your argument that apps are the only thing that matters. When most people think there are more fart apps than anything else, I doubt apps are perceived as the "scoring points" to the exclusion of everything else.
/end rant #apple
10/20/09
despite being an extra step, i don't know anyone who's actually done it who classifies jailbreaking as a pain in the ass. that said:
multi-tasking (all variants, incl. ability to respond to SMS w/o exiting app) - addressed by jailbreak
cut & paste and MMS (yay!) - addressed by latest vanilla OS
physical keys - people are split on this, so it's a fair gripe.
video recording - addressed by jailbreak
replaceable battery - fair enough.
replaceable memory - huh? why?
quick toggles for 3g, wifi, etc. - addressed by jailbreak (SBSettings)
customization - addressed by jailbreak (winterboard)
sync w/ more than one Exchange server - fair gripe but affects few people
ability to sync w/ non-iTunes - probably the most valid of your grievances. i'd KILL for drag and drop w/o itunes. #apple
10/20/09
You're right, though. Most of my gripes are addressed by various jailbreak-only apps, which is why I followed through with the aforementioned cycle for some time. I only listed them to illustrate other features which can be considered at least as important as "apps" for some people. And I'm sure many people would like to be able to use these features on the vanilla iPhone, especially since jailbreak apps prove the only limitations are artificial.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not disparaging the iPhone. I love mine - jailbroken or not.
BTW, thanks for the response.
10/21/09
And no your football statement is way out of wack clearly the situation is not the same. #apple