This just proves that, despite the fashionable hype about protecting the environment and conserving energy, people are just greedy consumer-whores who want instant gratification and will waste as much energy as necessary to get it.
Induction charging has been around for many years now, but it is inherently wasteful, as the increased amount of power required to creative the induction field means there will be power loss. No amount of materials science will improve that, it's simply a matter of electrical science. The benefit of induction charging has typically been for devices that, for safety reasons, can not have exposed contacts, such as underwater devices, or devices that must be sealed in environments with potentially fammable gasses, etc.
To wilfully and wantonly waste power this way, to no apparent gain, is just incredibly vain and ignorant. I'm apalled that Gizmodo would even report on such a device without looking deeper into the global impact of the device.
@BeautifulAgony: We humans will waste power on all sorts of things. People will cram their homes with lots of power-hungry appliances, and Giz will likely report on a great deal of their kinds, and this warrants a complaint? Sweet fancy Jesus (the 2,000 year old dude, not the Gizmodo dude, though he might be fancy, I don't know).
@darknecross: I think he/she meant something along the lines of damage caused by the wireless electronic signals. For example, the RF signals sent from cell phones are possibly dangerous and may lead to an increased risk of cancer.
01/08/09
Induction charging has been around for many years now, but it is inherently wasteful, as the increased amount of power required to creative the induction field means there will be power loss. No amount of materials science will improve that, it's simply a matter of electrical science. The benefit of induction charging has typically been for devices that, for safety reasons, can not have exposed contacts, such as underwater devices, or devices that must be sealed in environments with potentially fammable gasses, etc.
To wilfully and wantonly waste power this way, to no apparent gain, is just incredibly vain and ignorant. I'm apalled that Gizmodo would even report on such a device without looking deeper into the global impact of the device.
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
If you mean electrocution, there's no risk of that.
The same tech is already being used with electric toothbrushes and shavers.
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09