• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#energyefficiency

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 2:29 AM
Fri Nov 27
20 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #energyefficiency more →

    U.S. Flew to the Top in Wind Power Production Last Year

    Low-Power Radio Tech Could Eliminate Remote Control Battery Waste

    Pentagon Goes Green With 4,000 LED Installation

    Nokia Smart Home Solution Puts Power of Control Onto Your Cellphone

    Nuclear Powered Planes Will Not Assure the Destruction of Humankind

    E-Charkha Wheel Spins Yarn Whilst Generating Energy, Karma

    Fiat Eco Drive Tells You How To Drive Cleaner

    Ecobee Smart Thermostat Can Adjust Home Temps Online

    Free-Piston Engines Are Ultra-Efficient, Could Replace Gas and Diesel

    Google Claims Most Efficient Data Centers Ever

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Shadowlayer Shadowlayer
    02/05/09

    In reply to U.S. Flew to the Top in Wind Power Production Last Year
    Thats enough to power more than 20 DeLoreans!

     Reply
    Shadowlayer was starred Shadowlayer was unstarred
    Image of EBone EBone
    02/04/09

    In reply to U.S. Flew to the Top in Wind Power Production Last Year
    I'm proud to say that 252 megawatts of that new power was developed, constructed, and is managed by my company. In case you're curious, that's enough energy for about 100,000 homes annually.
     Reply
    EBone was starred EBone was unstarred
    Image of Lite: hates Illinois Nazis Lite: hates Illinois Nazis
    02/04/09

    In reply to U.S. Flew to the Top in Wind Power Production Last Year
    Wait, this can't be true! We became #1 in Wind Power production while Dubyah was in office! But, that's not right! Awwww people of Sherwood Forest we've been had, bamboozled, flimflammed... We didn't land on wind power, wind power landed on us.
     Reply
    Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was starred Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was unstarred
    Image of Luke Thornton Luke Thornton
    02/04/09

    In reply to U.S. Flew to the Top in Wind Power Production Last Year
    This is great news! Obama is going to DOUBLE the production of renewables...so in the next few years it's going to be very promising, slowly releasing our thirst for oil.


    I just can't wait for a time when electricity and clean energy are rife, clean air....mmmmmm. Knowing that using energy is not damaging anything, so i can use things without any 'guilt'.....twenty years from now the world will be a very different place, especially when considering China is making HUGE efforts to come out of the recession in a 'green' way

     Reply
    Luke Thornton was starred Luke Thornton was unstarred
    Image of VakeroRokero VakeroRokero
    02/04/09

    @Luke Thornton: double? he barely can get money to lend people, where is he going to get 30 trillion to spend on energy?
     Reply
    VakeroRokero was starred VakeroRokero was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    02/04/09

    @VakeroRokero: I can't pay the mortgage on the terms I agreed to, but I can afford a windmill for my house!
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of Lite: hates Illinois Nazis Lite: hates Illinois Nazis
    02/04/09

    @Luke Thornton: People keep talking about reducing the thirst for oil, but there really aren't enough electric powered vehicles on the market to do this, or even coming to market in the next 4 years.


    Most plants are coal or natural gas powered in the US. Not OIL powered anyway.


    I think you mean cleaner energy sources here. It's going to be a LONG time until we're really off of oil.


    But, what about the noise pollution from windmills? Or, you know, the fact that they kill birds? Even wind power isn't perfect here.


    I'm glad we're pursuing alternative fuel sources, but I can tell you that ethanol is a sham and yet another way to starve poor people.


    What we need, is energy from space!

     Reply
    Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was starred Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    02/04/09

    @Lite: must go faster.: OK, seriously. If a bird can't spot a whirling 150 foot blade, perhaps it's good we eliminate that bird. It seems that's the kind of bird who would ignore a plane flying at it until it gets sucked into the engine.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of Purple Dave Purple Dave
    02/04/09

    In reply to U.S. Flew to the Top in Wind Power Production Last Year
    I just saw our governor giving some line about how she's going to set it up so that everyone in Michigan can sell solar power back to the power companies. And I though to myself...so what will we do the other nine months of the year?
     Reply
    Purple Dave was starred Purple Dave was unstarred
    Image of Lite: hates Illinois Nazis Lite: hates Illinois Nazis
    02/04/09

    @Purple Dave: In most states your meter can run forward or backward. So if you produce more energy than you consume, the power company must pay you.
     Reply
    Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was starred Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was unstarred
    Image of Purple Dave Purple Dave
    02/04/09

    @Lite: shops smart. He shops at S-Mart.:
    In Michigan, we have these things called "clouds". That and the blanket of snow that's likely to be covering the solar panels during the winter months means that solar panels are pretty much just a fancy way to dress up your roof for most of the year. I understand the whole thing with being able to sell excess home-generated power back to the company (and indeed, I didn't think it required a new law for that to work). It's just that solar power would be a lot more cost-effective if we were, say, a desert. Wind-power would make more sense, especially given how much coastline we have, but people don't like having those things parked in their backyards.


    No, the only way you're likely to be able to sell solar power back to the power company while living in Michigan is if you cover every square inch of your property in solar panels and go on vacation for most of the summer. Otherwise it'll just cut down on your power bill a little bit.

     Reply
    Purple Dave was starred Purple Dave was unstarred
    Image of Theophilus P. Wildebeeste Theophilus P. Wildebeeste
    01/11/09

    In reply to Low-Power Radio Tech Could Eliminate Remote Control Battery Waste
    We had RF remotes before, late 70's early 80's?


    They had the side effect of being able to control devices throughout the block, if I can recall correctly.

     Reply
    Theophilus P. Wildebeeste was starred Theophilus P. Wildebeeste was unstarred
    Image of Purple Dave Purple Dave
    01/11/09

    @Theophilus P. Wildebeeste:
    Yeah...I was kinda leery about that as well. I got an RF remote control outlet thingy (where you could simply turn a device on and off with a little keychain remote) from Radio Shack, and until I reset the dip switches, someone else in the area was turning it on and off.


    Honestly, if you don't want to keep sending alkalines to the landfills, start buying the newer hybrid NiMH batteries instead, like Sanyo's Eneloop brand. They'll hold some portion of their charge for over a year, so once the remote stops working properly all you have to do is drop them in the charger overnight. Alternately, simply realize that unless you're one of those idiots who spends more time channel-surfing than actually watching something, alkalines should last you a few years if they're fresh. Alternately-alternately, if you use alkalines in other devices, simply realize that a remote control uses a fraction of the amount of power that, say, a camera uses, so once your batteries stop working in a different device, put them in the "for use with remotes" pile, and swap them out as necessary (you were already going to throw those batteries out anyways, and now you don't have to pay to recharge batteries just for your remote).

     Reply
    Purple Dave was starred Purple Dave was unstarred
    Image of ERIFNOMI ERIFNOMI
    01/11/09

    In reply to Low-Power Radio Tech Could Eliminate Remote Control Battery Waste
    why is there a light (I'd assume infrared) if it is radio? And if it's radio there has to be some IR blaster that sends the IR signal unless they are going to make all new TVs etc use radio signal remotes (bluetooth?)
     Reply
    ERIFNOMI was starred ERIFNOMI was unstarred
    Image of BeautifulAgony BeautifulAgony
    01/11/09

    @ERIFNOMI: Although not mentioned here, the original article refers to the fact that the new RF standard for remotes is not Greenpeak's idea, rather, it's a new standard being developed for remotes by a group of electronics companies in the industry. Greenpeak's technology is merely evolutionary, and utilizes both RF as well as traditional IR methods. They are hoping to sell their technologies to companies who already make remotes.


    From what I've read, Greenpeak hasn't done much more than lower power requirements slightly, and stick some non-replaceable lithium batteries in the unit, which depending upon usage, could either be fantastic, or extremely annoying. I'd prefer to see manufacturers utilize a system where rechargeables in the remote could be charged by docking the remote to the television or stereo receiver, amplifier, etc.

     Reply
    BeautifulAgony was starred BeautifulAgony was unstarred
    Image of HawaiianActor HawaiianActor
    01/11/09

    @ERIFNOMI: from the link:


    "Green Peak is hoping its technology gets combined with a new RF remote control standard called RF4CE being developed by Panasonic, Philips, Samsung and Sony. We could see a lot more RF remote controls being included with HDTVs and Blu-ray players in the fall. But Green Peak's name won't be on any of them, despite what you see in the picture. They're selling their technology to folks who make the remote controls."

     Reply
    HawaiianActor was starred HawaiianActor was unstarred
    Image of HawaiianActor HawaiianActor
    01/11/09

    @BeautifulAgony: beat me to it
     Reply
    HawaiianActor was starred HawaiianActor was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    01/11/09

    In reply to Low-Power Radio Tech Could Eliminate Remote Control Battery Waste
    How about a remote with a crank? I mean, I could be watching TV and charging my remote at the same time!
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of im.thatoneguy im.thatoneguy
    01/11/09

    @PorkchopSandwiches!_GitEmSteveDave: Genius!


    Or shake powered.


    I already have to give my Logitech a little shake to wake it up. Might as well help charge too.

     Reply
    im.thatoneguy was starred im.thatoneguy was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    01/11/09

    @im.thatoneguy: Well, watching TV while shaking a remote in my fist might send the wrong idea on my webcam....
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    01/11/09

    In reply to Pentagon Goes Green With 4,000 LED Installation
    Obama effect?
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    01/11/09

    @Noobs-R-Us: Too soon. I think it's just general cost savings. I was watching on the Pentagon Channel how the military was paying millions of dollars in fines to shipping companies b/c they were not returning the shipping containers back to them. So they made up a group who tracks and handles just shipping containers, and it's saving them tens to hundreds of millions of dollars.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of Gianni Manganelli Gianni Manganelli
    01/11/09

    @PorkchopSandwiches!_GitEmSteveDave:


    Now the scary thing is...


    ... What the hell are they shipping?


    Toilet paper in case the shit hits the fan?

     Reply
    Gianni Manganelli was starred Gianni Manganelli was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    01/11/09

    @Gianni Manganelli: All sorts of things, like ammo, parts, beer, etc...
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of frigg frigg
    01/11/09

    In reply to Pentagon Goes Green With 4,000 LED Installation
    When is it going to be able to lift off the ground and fly like a proper starship?
     Reply
    frigg was starred frigg was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    01/11/09

    @frigg: Give McKay three minutes, will you please? Genius can't be rushed! You want fast results, call Zelenka, and don't come running to Rodney when it crashes!
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of A Puzzled Mind A Puzzled Mind
    01/11/09

    @JM2ยข_GitEmSteveDave:


    You did not just pull out the SG:A nerfdom did you?

     Reply
    A Puzzled Mind was starred A Puzzled Mind was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    01/11/09

    @A Puzzled Mind: Sorry last episode and all. McKay is my hero with getting Jewel Staite as a GF.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of OMG! Chariot! OMG! Chariot!
    01/11/09

    In reply to Pentagon Goes Green With 4,000 LED Installation
    2 terrorist flying a hijacked plane:


    Terrorist 1 - Look! there is 4000 green freaking led's on that building!


    Terrorist 2 - wth!? Lets crash into it!

     Reply
    OMG! Chariot! was starred OMG! Chariot! was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid
    01/11/09

    @Chariot: 2 horses hijack a plane, pilot says:

    Why the long faces?
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was starred GitEmSteveDave_DefinesTurgid was unstarred
    Image of strider_mt2k strider_mt2k
    12/02/08

    In reply to Nokia Smart Home Solution Puts Power of Control Onto Your Cellphone
    Could we show an older Tablet?
     Reply
    strider_mt2k was starred strider_mt2k was unstarred
    Image of tamoko tamoko
    10/29/08

    In reply to Nuclear Powered Planes Will Not Assure the Destruction of Humankind
    What a great topic. I could read these comments for hours.... in fact, when I get to work, I probably will!
     Reply
    tamoko was starred tamoko was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.