<![CDATA[Gizmodo: enterprise]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: enterprise]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/enterprise http://gizmodo.com/tag/enterprise <![CDATA[Submarine Enterprise Going Where no Swimming Trunks Have Gone Before]]> Since an actual flying RC model of the USS Enterprise NCC-1701-A is still a few anti-gravity discoveries away, this is the next best thing: A submarine Enterprise that you can fly in your swimming pool, by Japanese modeler Starfleet Yokosuka.

I only see one problem to this huge retrofitted 1/350 scale model: How the hell do you make pew-pew sounds under water? [Hobby Media via Makezine]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5433712&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Spandau Ballet To Be First Intergalactic Band Aboard Branson's SpaceShipTwo Enterprise]]> Last week I invoked the wrath of trance fans everywhere by suggesting Above & Beyond, rumored to be the first musical act in space, should be kept up there. Turns out Richard Branson chose Spandau Ballet instead.

I think I now want a ticket aboard Enterprise even more than I did before.

They're performing just one song, rumored to be either Gold, True or I'll Fly For You (surprising news to anyone who thought they had just two songs) if Spandau Ballet guitarist/saxophonist Steve Norman is to be believed. With only six passengers and two pilots allowed on that first Enterprise flight, the five Spandau Balleters will make up almost half the human weight. Although judging by the looks of Tony Hadley these days, maybe it'd be more like 50/50. [The List]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5426082&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[USS Enterprise Bong Follows My Prime Directive Precisely]]> Some intrepid Trekkie/stoner decided to combine his two favorite things, creating this awesome USS Enterprise bong. The movie didn't need any help being entertaining, but this certainly won't hurt. [What-a-Bong Via io9]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5302603&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mystery Solved: This is Where R2-D2 Is in Star Trek]]> The mystery is over. After all, R2-D2 wasn't the astromech calculating the warp trajectories for the Enterprise. Here you have the exact timing of his stellar cameo—and the frame capture to prove it Updated

During the Drill Machine sequence as the Enterprise comes out of its barrel role amidst destruction of the other Federation ships above Vulcan, we cut to an interior Enterprise bridge over the shoulder of Kirk that is looking out through the front viewscreen. In space, R2-D2 is floating in the debris from about the top middle of the screen to the bottom right.

Poor R2. [Oh No They Didn't]

Update: The scene is that but that is not R2-D2 according to one ILM Star Trek effects supervisor. Unfortunately, he and Paramount can't show the scene yet.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5286649&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Big Is the New Enterprise Compared to the Old One?]]> 725.35 meters. A whoppumental 2,379.75 feet. That's how big the new super-sized Enterprise is. Here you can see it compared against the Galactica, the good old Enterprise, the Blockade Runner, and the ISS. UPDATED

Click on this image to see the full picture.

When JJ Abrams said that he wanted to put some Star Wars into Star Trek, apparently it also applied to the scale of spaceships (and matching viewscreens.) And while the new Enterprise doesn't even reach half of the 1,600 meters—that's a mile long—of an Imperial Star Destroyer, it's still amazingly big compared to the 288 meters of the old Enterprise. Maybe now you would be able to take down an Star Destroyer with a couple of these.

The battle I would really want to see now, however, is not the old Star Trek vs Star Wars (we already know who would win that one.) No, you know what I want to see.

Yes, Starbuck vs Uhura. In a chocolate pudding pit.

Maybe Galactica vs Enterprise too, but that's a distant second. [Thanks to David B. from Bad Robot Productions]

UPDATE: Since we did the original ISS comparison, the specifications for the new Battlestar Galactica have changed. After the end of the series, one of the visual effects guy shared information about the actual size of Adama's new ship. It measures 1,438.64 meters. Almost a mile, so it's bigger than the new Enterprise and less than 200 meters shy of an Imperial Star Destroyer. I changed the graphic to display the old Galactica, which has the correct size. [Thanks to the readers who pointed this out]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5253324&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Star Trek vs Star Wars: The Empire Wins Again]]> I thought we already established this fact, but this cool video proves it again: It shows what would happen if the Enterprise arrived to an alternative San Francisco, occupied by the Evil Galactic Empire.

Too bad the video gets ruined by the crappy explosion at the end. I'm sure JJ Abrams would approve, though.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5245451&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Wolfram Alpha Search Engine On Video]]> Wolfram—the magical search engine that will channel all kinds of data to give you coherent answers—is almost here. You can't access it yet, but you can see it working in this video. [NYT and Lifehacker]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5236115&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Mystery of the Huge Box Finally Revealed]]> What was inside the the Huge Mystery Box? Some people got it with Trekkie Betty's stockings, others with the second hint, and some with Uhura's bra. Here is the seeeecret—revealed: The Hot Rod Enterprise.

A couple of months ago Brian asked me: "Do you want to do something cool?"

This is something that Brian asks sometimes. It usually involves latex, handcuffs, and chocolate pudding. Fortunately, this wasn't the case.

"It's not what you think," he added. (see?)

"Hmmm..."—I replied—"does it involve getting in scuba gear, jump on a supersonic plane, skydive into the Pacific Ocean, search for the remains of a Spanish galleon, find a gazillion gold doubloons, buy an island, and hire five former Playboy playmates to play rock paper scissors all day long?"

"No, but it's pretty cool"—he said—"what about doing a custom Enterprise for JJ Abrams."

Which, mind you, is not as cool as my first idea, but it's pretty cool nonetheless. And I did. They sent me the Enterprise, one of 30 models. The other 29 were sent to other people: artists, movie directors like Robert Rodriguez, and designers around the country.

Not all of them have arrived, but they are being distributed across cinemas in the US as I write these lines. Mine—Enterprise 10—is located at the The Bridge Cinema de Lux in Los Angeles, California. And my favorite so far—Enterprise 15, or Oreo Enterprise—is located at Rave Town Square Theater in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Check the rest in this link. [Star Trek Enterprise Gallery]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5210517&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[BlackBerry is the Smartphone of Choice for Gangs and Criminals]]> Society's bad eggs are increasingly turning to the use of BlackBerry devices to skirt detection from law enforcement. Authorities report they have trouble intercepting illicit emails and conversations because of the relatively secure BlackBerry Enterprise Server.

Developed by Research in Motion (RIM), the BlackBerry Enterprise Server works on a secure network that encrypts data. It was designed with the intention of keeping the security legitimate business communications intact. Faced against such a highly secure means of transmitting of information, however, it's near impossible for law enforcement to listen in on and nab suspected criminals. The roadblocks have undoubtedly lead to the upward trend in gangs and other malefactors choosing the BlackBerry over other devices, where conversations can be more easily intercepted.

While some Canadian legislators support major de-encryption efforts, this will inadvertently compromise the security of business communications as well. [Mobile Syrup]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5184416&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Coolest Screen In the Universe Still Has Focus Problems]]> While I'm sure I will like the new Star Trek, I can't help to ask myself deep questions about it. Like: Why in hell they can't get their communications to look sharp in The Future?

Seriously. By then you think they should have realized how the frak to get this whole video communication thing to work right. I'm not even asking for 4096p high definition holographic projections with Smell-o-rama™. Heck, even the holograms look like crap in Star Wars. But this is just wrong.

On one side you have the Federation, with technology capable of warp speed and tele-transportation and frikking photon torpedoes and phasers and generators that can create cheese-and-bacon burgers and fries and Guinness out of thin air. On the other, the Romulan Empire, which can do the same but wearing funky pants and eating tempura tofu instead of greasy burgers. And yet, the useless sons-of-Klingon-bitches can't get their communications to look half-way decent.

I mean, check this newly-released image from the film. Even my iChat AV works better—and that's crap on its own. Unless... unless they are telling me the Enterprise's screen is 3D and the image requires green-and-red eyeglasses, that is.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5171462&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Wolfram Alpha Search Engine Will Answer All Your Questions, Take Us to Infinity and Beyond]]> Get ready, because the world as we know it is going to change in May 2009, when Wolfram Alpha—a computational search engine that belongs in the Enterprise's computer—appears, giving you precise answers to everything.

That's what this thing is going to give us: A natural way to plug into the vast pool of information of the internet and ask questions like Kirk does in Star Trek. At least according to Stephen Wolfram—who changed the world of mathematical research with his Mathematica software and, as geniuses go, he's up there with the best—and other scientists who have tried it. The new engine will be able to truly interpret your questions and give you a real, precise answer to them.

It won't use a database of preset questions, however. The engine is designed using extremely advanced algorithms so it truly has the ability to actually understand what you are asking for. So if you type "How many protons are in a lasagna for six people?", the system will be able to recognize, interpret, connect the pieces of available information and give you the answer to the question—provided the question has an answer, of course.

I find this fascinating. An engine that could actually interpret your questions and the information available to give you specific answers is the Holy Grail of information technology. Wolfram doesn't claim Wolfram Alpha will fully achieve this, but he and other scientists are claiming this is a huge step towards that goal. We will have to wait and see how well it works—before Google buys it.

It also reminds me of one of my favorite short stories by Isaac Asimov. In his robot tales, he wrote about humanity inventing a computer to answer questions. The computer will give a lot of answers, but it will never be able to answer the biggest questions of them all: What is the origin of it all?

As it evolved and expanded through the universe, humanity's consciousness became part of the megacomputer. Periodically, first individual people, then a stream of consciousness, will ask that question: What's the origin of it all? No answer will be given after ages computing it except: "Not enough information."

At the end of the tale, the universe is completely dead and dark. By then, the megacomputerhumanity was already in a separate dimension, a huge stream of energy, just thinking about the answer to that question. At the end, the computer finds the answer and says:

'Let there be light.'

And there was light.

In the meantime, we can only hope that nobody asks "what was first, the chicken or the egg?" or we will all go to hell. [Wolfram via Daily Mail]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5167257&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Majel Barret: The Voice of the Enterprise Dies]]> Glad Joel posted this, because I almost missed it: Majel Barret joined her husband Gene Roddenberry Where Many People Have Gone Before. Maybe you think you don't know her, but you do.

You have heard her voice many times: She was the voice of the Enterprise's computer. She died yesterday age 76.

The First Lady of Star Trek, as she was known, married Roddenberry in Japan in August 1969, after the end of the original Star Trek TV series. She also worked in other TV shows, like Bonanza, The Untouchables, and The Lucy Show, with Lucille Ball. She also was the voice of the USS Enterprise in every single movie and TV episode of Star Trek.

She then returned in The Next Generation, trying to take the underpants off Jean Luc Picard as Ambassador Lwaxana Troi, and returned to the screen in Deep Space Nine, where she was actually able to take off the underpants of Constable Odo.

Her last work in the Star Trek universe was was two weeks ago, reprising her role as the voice of the mighty Federation ship for the new Star Trek movie by J.J. Abrams. [Mercury News and Wikipedia via Boing Boing Gadgets]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5114150&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Fusion-io ioDrive Is The Fastest Storage Device in the World]]> The ioDrive is a PCI Express storage card that can write at up to 368 MB/s and read at 473 MB/s to its NAND flash memory—or, for the layman: really, really damn fast.

To put it into perspective, that's nearly 2x the read speed of Intel's already fast SSDs, and roughly 5x the write speed. The ioDrive uses the same NAND flash memory of an SSD, but since it plugs in to a PCI Express bus rather than SATA and only works with 64-bit systems, it can achieve speeds nothing else can touch. And yes, here we are talking megaBYTEs, not megaBITs—a lower metric often used for data transmission speeds.

For now it's for enterprise stuff exlusively—an 80GB version will set you back $3,000, on up to $14,400 for 320GB. If you are interested in this kind of thing, the boys at Tweaktown have written a ten pager on it. [Tweaktown via BBG]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5107281&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Star Trek vs Star Wars: The Final Battle]]> With the new Star Trek movie coming, the ongoing war between factions in the Giz bullpen is heating up, to the point in which not even cold turkey or Black Friday deals can stop it: On one side, with officially-licensed James T. Kirk & Spock Love briefs, Jason Chen. On the other, me* in my Darth Vader glow-in-the-dark underpants. And on the third side of this sci-fi menage a trois, the rest of the crew laughing at us. Then, in the middle, the Old Question that has pitted friend against friend, brother versus brother in bloody nerd combat for decades: Who would win in battle, a 642.5—meter long Galaxy-class Federation starship or a 1,600-meter long Imperial Star Destroyer? This newly-released video gives a definitive answer, once and forever. Or does it? Watch it and let another ferocious geek battle begin in the comments. [Thanks Jim]

* Disclaimer: I like Star Trek as much as I like Star Wars. I just like to piss off Chen and Lam.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5099748&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Big Is the ISS Compared to Science Fiction Spaceships?]]>

We are so used to the International Space Station that we don't give its massive scale a second thought. I, for one, took it for granted until a newly-released NASA photograph reminded me that this thing is huge. So huge that I fired up Photoshop and did an illustration comparing it to a Colonial Viper Mk1, a Corellian corvette, the USS Enterprise NCC-1701-A, and the new Battlestar Galactica. Check both the high resolution sizemodo and the amazing NASA photo after the jump.

<<< Click on the sizemodo to see the high definition image*

Here's the NASA photography, showing the scale of an astronaut against a small section of the International Space Station.



I don't know about you, but this one really make me go oh-ah. Maybe it's all a fake and that guy is a Lego Minifig.

ISS Size:

Mass: 300,214 kg (661,857 lb) (June 18, 2008)
Length: 58.2 m (191 ft) along truss (February 22, 2007)
Width: 44.5 m (146 ft) from Destiny to Zvezda
Height: 27.4 m (90 ft) (February 22, 2007)

Solar arrays span: 73.15 m (240 ft) (February 22, 2007)

* The sizemodo shows the final completed ISS. The scale is 1 pixel = 0.5 meters. Scaled and measured with Photoshop's measurement tool.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5099175&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Proxim Orinoco AP-8000 Doubles Wi-Fi Throughput With Two 802.11n Radios]]> This one's more for the IT dudes, but is interesting as an indication of how we may see more speed squeezed out of the 802.11n wi-fi spec: a new enterprise access point from Proxim uses two 802.11n radios simultaneously, effectively doubling throughput to 320 Mbps (a single wireless N radio maxes out at around 170 Mbps). But it can't just be that simple, right?

No. The bottleneck in a setup like this is the centralized wireless controller chipset architecture that routes all of the data coming in and out. Proxim's solution, instead, uses a new distributed wireless architecture for which enables it to smartly share the burden over the two radios. It uses two standard Atheros 802.11n radio chips and a controller processor from Freescale. This is also different from the many dual-band routers out there that use two radios, but only for each band individually—not combined into a single bandwidth pipe.

Of course, your computer only has one radio, so you won't see double the speeds on your local machine. This just helps cram more data onto a huge enterprise network without bringing it down, but an interesting strategy that could, theoretically, find its way into more consumer-type gear. The dual-radio AP-8000 costs $1,099, and also looks like a Dungeness crab after I've eaten four delicious legs already. Sold! [Product Page via GigaOM]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5090541&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First Look At the New USS Enterprise]]> Entertainment Weekly's got an exclusive first picture of the new Enterprise, also known as the old Enterprise, also known as Kirk's Enterprise. It looks quite Enterprisey—a sort of mashup between the old sensibilities of TOS, the more advanced special effects of the USS Enterprise E (Picard's latest ship) and Scott Bakula's lousy junker. Looking at it again, those fat nacelles make it seem more like a cross between the Enterprise A and the Enterprise B. In any case, a high five to JJ Abrams and his effects crew for making a ship we're looking forward to seeing go "pew pew pew" next year. [EW]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5083663&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Star Trek's Enterprise Boldly Went 42 Years Ago Today]]> Star Trek fans will be tickled to know that the good ol' starship Enterprise first took flight on network TV on September 8th 1966, and split infinitives became OK. Actually, aspects of the show have become such cultural items that even non-sci-fi fans know the thrilling soundtrack, the iconic hull of NCC-1701 zipping into warp, Kirk, Spock, Scotty, McCoy, Uhura, Sulu and Chekov, polystyrene alien worlds, and the inevitable death of red-sweatered crewmen. Who hasn't switched on their cellphone (or flipped it open... old Motorola StarTacs were the best) and muttered "beam me up, Scotty"? All that began 42 years ago, a number that'll please a different set of sci-fi fans. Fingers crossed for the upcoming reboot movie. [Wired]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046570&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Touch Screen RC Star Trek Enterprise Boldly Goes Where No RC Vehicle Has Gone Before]]> Interstellar space flight may have been poo-poo'd on by astrophysicists this week, but that doesn't mean we can't have a little pseudo space-faring fun with this first-of-its-kind RC Star Trek Enterprise. Due to arrive in May 2009, the $80 foam flyer is controlled via a vintage Star Trek touchscreen communicator (Captain James T. Kirk womanizing is not necessary, but recommended).

You charge the RC Enterprise with a=the tricorder-shaped charger seen above (sorry, no space dock just yet). After a 15-minute charge, the Enterprise is ready to fly again. [Entertainment Earth via Geek Alerts]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041014&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Star Trek Medical Tricorder Goes Beep, Won't Diagnose Alien Disease]]> This replica medical tricorder from Star Trek TOS is hugely detailed and looks pretty much like the "real" thing. It even comes with the removable scanner thingy. Plus it's got light and sound effects built-in, so you won't have to hold it over alien flu victims and whisper "widdlyweep... widdlyweep..." Mind you, I'm pretty sure that's what Bones used to do anyway— he never seemed to know exactly what was wrong with people, did he? With one of these and a bit of carpentry to construct one of those beds with the heart-monitor thing that went "thum... thum...," you could reenact the Enterprise medical scene of your choosing. Available soon for $39.95. [Geekalerts]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=383040&view=rss&microfeed=true