Pet owners that let their animals get this fat should not be allowed to own pets. There's nothing ok about this. You're supposed to manage their nutrition.
Myspace pictures are living proof that the camera can do a greater evil: detract 10-150 pounds. It's all about the angle and lighting.
How can it be evil? I know of a girl who is HUMONGOUS in real life but in her myspace picture looks quite average. (Thank God this isn't Jezebel! :)) Imagine if you met her online, a nice young girl who seems to know a lot of people and all her girl friends describe her as "cute"(first warning sign). Her myspace/facebook pictures make her look pretty appealing and you dismissed the dark lighting and the odd angles as artistic creativity. You decide to meet her.
BANG! BAM! That night, you are shocked to realize that you always had a fetish for chubby girls. You realize you are no longer normal, do not fit in the norms of society and decide to become a Gizmodo editor. THE END.
@Curves: You're completely right :). The joy of being online is that you create a separate personality and express your deepest emotions with no fear. It's just when the online and the real world are collided that the problem starts...
My relief about not being in Jezebel is that my politically-incorrect statement would most likely lead to a de-starr+ban, very similarly to what happened to a lot of Jalopnik starred commenters only a week ago.
@MrBangBam: You have to know your audience. You dont make fun of El Caminos @ Jalopnik, you dont make fun of the IPhone @ Giz, etc. I stay away from Jez just because they dont post anything there that I am really interested in.
BTW, I am curvacous and DAMN proud of it.
In my opinion, as a "semi pro" photographer and Photoshopper, the problem is that "flat" lighting can create (or destroy) illusions very easily. Low quality video, such as VHS, has a very flat range with poor contrast ratios. This can give false depth cues, or create an unwanted range of shadows in low-light conditions. Moving to S-Video helps tremendously because of the seperate chroma and luminance channels, giving more depth and seperation, and allowing for better, and more consistent, lighting.
Similarly, amateur photogs who use point-and-shoot cameras and rely on the built-in flash will get images that exacerbate weight problems. The harsh light floods the front of the subject, hiding depth cues, and also will bounce from nearby walls giving unwanted harsh "wrap" light to the side of the subject. This ends up creating the illusion of a wider subject, because we perceive the lit areas as being front-facing.
Somehting as simple as diffusing the flash with a small piece of tissue paper can alleviate this and help maintain a more pleasing white balance as well.
08/10/09
I couldn't pay attention to the text... completely mesmerized by that incredibly cute fat cat...
08/10/09
took me back a few years
08/10/09
Otter, a close friends cat weighing in at about 32 lbs! and yes the vet says he's healthy...
08/10/09
08/10/09
How can it be evil? I know of a girl who is HUMONGOUS in real life but in her myspace picture looks quite average. (Thank God this isn't Jezebel! :)) Imagine if you met her online, a nice young girl who seems to know a lot of people and all her girl friends describe her as "cute"(first warning sign). Her myspace/facebook pictures make her look pretty appealing and you dismissed the dark lighting and the odd angles as artistic creativity. You decide to meet her.
BANG! BAM! That night, you are shocked to realize that you always had a fetish for chubby girls. You realize you are no longer normal, do not fit in the norms of society and decide to become a Gizmodo editor. THE END.
08/10/09
(I dont even go to Jezebel and I have no testicles to be sliced off.)
08/10/09
My relief about not being in Jezebel is that my politically-incorrect statement would most likely lead to a de-starr+ban, very similarly to what happened to a lot of Jalopnik starred commenters only a week ago.
08/10/09
BTW, I am curvacous and DAMN proud of it.
08/10/09
08/10/09
Similarly, amateur photogs who use point-and-shoot cameras and rely on the built-in flash will get images that exacerbate weight problems. The harsh light floods the front of the subject, hiding depth cues, and also will bounce from nearby walls giving unwanted harsh "wrap" light to the side of the subject. This ends up creating the illusion of a wider subject, because we perceive the lit areas as being front-facing.
Somehting as simple as diffusing the flash with a small piece of tissue paper can alleviate this and help maintain a more pleasing white balance as well.
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
08/10/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
or are you?
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
But alas with Heath no more the joke's on us...
02/23/09
02/23/09