<![CDATA[Gizmodo: Fbi]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: Fbi]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/fbi http://gizmodo.com/tag/fbi <![CDATA[ CIA Inflatable Sex Doll Experiment: "Blow Up" Gets New Meaning ]]> You know how, when KGB agents are tailing you, all you want to do is roll out of the car while your driver keeps going? Only those agents aren't dumb: If they suddenly see one fewer head inside the car, they're gonna know something's up. Spytechs at the CIA figured that if you brought along something compact yet inflatable, you could quickly blow it up as you exited the vehicle, and nobody would see any difference. It was the early '80s so, naturally, the researchers thought of sex dolls.

Two noob CIA engineers were sent to a shady shop in DC's red-light district to pick up some anatomically correct sexy-time dolls. The dolls were attached to a system of rapid inflation, essentially a tank of compressed air that could pump the dolls up in less than a second. Only problem was, the dolls split at the seams when the inflation happened too quickly. (Ooh la la!)

This being the pre-internet era, and a time when mail-order took 6-8 weeks for delivery, those two poor bastards had to keep going back again and again to the sex shops to buy new dolls. The description in Spycraft is priceless:

When the young techs returned to a store for more dolls, the proprietor's quizzical stare seemed to raise uncomfortable questions about their private lives. After all, they could not explain, "You see, we work for the CIA..."
Try as they might, the techs couldn't get the sexy plastic ladies (or men?) to blow up appropriately, and even with added valves for air control, they tended to sag inhumanly.

Added to that was the problem of rapid deflation—agents who jumped out of cars tended to jump back into them after the mission or drop was carried out. Probably the most embarrassing scenario would be that the KGB caught up with the agent after he had jumped back in the car, and got a closeup of him wrestling with a sex doll in the back seat.

The "elegant solution" was, sadly, far less risque. The "Jack-in-the-Box" (or JIB) that went into operation tucked inside a briefcase, and emerged as a simple, two-dimensional cutout of a man's head and shoulders. Apparently KGB tails didn't get too close—merely the suggestion of a body was enough.

As if to drive this point home, CIA agent and US traitor Edward Lee Howard—on the run from a suspicious FBI in Santa Fe in 1985—built his own JIB out of a toilet plunger, a coat hanger and a Calvin Klein jacket, with a Styrofoam dummy head wearing a fashionable Jerome Alexander wig to complete the illusion. He jumped out of the moving car as his wife drove, propping up the dummy in her hubby's place. (Who was the bigger dummy: the dummy, the lady propping up the dummy or the guy selling state secrets to the Soviet Union?) Sadly, American agents were as easily duped as their Eastern Block counterparts. According to Spycraft, "The FBI did not discover his escape until some 25 hours after he jumped from the car."

All of this CIA tech and much more like it is covered with great depth and hair-raising anecdotes in Spycraft, a new book by Robert Wallace and H. Keith Melton, reviewed by us, and available for pre-order at Amazon.

]]>
Fri, 23 May 2008 00:30:00 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392904&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ House Denies Warrantless Wiretapping Immunity For Telcos ]]> In a textbook display of checks and balances, the House of Representatives defied President Bush and the Senate yesterday by passing their version of a surveillance bill without legal immunity for telcos. The bill passed by only 16 votes, far from the 2/3 majority needed to override Bush's inevitable veto. It looks like this legislative battle could continue until the next president takes office in 2009. As we have seen, an Obama administration would deny immunity, McCain would grant immunity, and Clinton? Who knows. [dslreports]

]]>
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:55:46 EDT Eric Sheline http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368314&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Futronic's FS88 Fingerprint Scanner Detects Difference Between Live, Dead Fingers ]]> Say goodbye to those lousy movie plots where some girl that looks like Jennifer Garner cuts off a high-ranking execs' finger in order to gain access to some room. Futronic's latest FS88 fingerprint scanner is not only FBI approved, but it can detect the difference between live and dead fingers. As an added bonus, it can even reject fake fingers that are made out of Play-Doh, rubber or other materials people make fake fingerprints out of. No pricing yet, but the unit comes with a USB cable and an LED-illuminated scanning window, meaning that your home office just got a lot fancier (and secure). [Windows For Devices]

]]>
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:30:55 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366509&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Whistleblower Says the Feds Are Spying on Your (Verizon) Mobile Phone Too ]]> Not sweating the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program 'cause you don't have a landline, just a mobile? Tell your glands to kick in again. A computer security consultant working for a wireless carrier—probably Verizon—stumbled upon a high-speed backdoor built into the carrier's network for the Feds to pull anything from "the billing system, text messaging, fraud detection, web site, and pretty much all the systems in the data center without apparent restrictions."

Threat Level pegs the wireless carrier as Verizon Wireless, because of a 2006 lawsuit whose allegations are extremely similar—a direct line built into their network for a "Quantico recipient" (Quantico, Virginia being the FBI's cyber-surveillance HQ) which allowed:

"Direct access to all content and all information concerning the origin and termination of telephone calls placed on the Verizon Wireless network as well as the actual content of calls."
Plus!
"Unfettered access to Verizon Wireless customer records, data and information. Any customer databases, records and information could be downloaded from this center."
Naturally, Verizon's mouthpiece Peter Thonis couldn't confirm or deny anything about a Quantico setup or if Pasdar worked for Verizon.

Takeaway, if you're dense: Everything is tapped, there's nothing you can do about it. Whatever thrust there was in righteous outrage is spent and pointless—but at least you know when you're talking to yourself (on a phone?), there's probably someone listening. =) [Threat Level]

]]>
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:00:36 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364435&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FBI Wiretaps Shut Down:The Feds Weren't Paying the Bills (and Other Frightening Things) ]]> Here is a comforting thought for you. Apparently the FBI has routinely failed to pay telecom companies for providing phone and internet lines that they had been using for wiretaps and other super-secret surveillance. This has resulted in at least one company cutting a foreign intelligence wiretap until the bill is paid.

It appears that part of the problem is due to the FBI being unable to keep track of their complicated bill. Other problems stem from the telecoms billing the FBI multiple times for individual surveillance warrants. Former FBI agent and now ACLU national security policy counsel Mike German noted that the telecoms were letting the government engage in spying without warrants and allowed them to illegally get customer records. He noted: "To put it bluntly it sounds as though the telecoms believe it when FBI says warrant is in the mail but not when they say the check is in the mail."

If all of this doesn't make you laugh and scare the hell out of you at the same time, I don't know what will. [Wired]

]]>
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:57:21 EST Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=343543&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Afternoon News: FBI Billboards, Radiohead Webcast, and Patents, Patents, Patents ]]> • The FBI wants to install 150 digital billboards in 20 US cities in the next few weeks to show fugitives, missing people and gadget bloggers. [Network World]
Oft-discussed Radiohead will have a live webcast concert at midnight on January 1. It's almost cool to stay home on New Year's Eve now. [Pitchfork]
• Google is stuck in patent troll hell with Hyperphase Technologies, LLC. The company claims it holds patents on certain parts of AdSense technology. [The Register]
• Yahoo filed a patent for "smart drag-and-drop" technology, which means "displaying drop targets in proximity to a drag-able selected object." Too bad everything from MS Excel to Apple Mail to Adobe Flash all use similar technology already. [Ars Technica]
• Vonage finalized their settlement with AT&T over the former infringing on the latter's VoIP patents. The settlement is believed to be somewhere in the neighborhood of $39 million. [CRN]

]]>
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:00:00 EST Benny Goldman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338161&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FBI's $1 Billion Biometric Database Will Help Catch the Bad Guys ]]> Database%20Matrix%20GI.jpgThe FBI is planning to spend $1 billion on the world's largest biometric database. The database will be used to create a big brother state, in which you will ultimately have little autonomy assist the FBI's efforts in catching the bad guys. Apparently, compilation of digital images, including mug shots, fingerprints and palm patterns have already begun.

The FBI is expected to step-up the initiative in January 2008, when it will award a 10-year contract to a company that will assist with the construction of the database, named the Next Generation Identification system. Further, employers will be able to request information regarding their employees is retained, which will mean the system will have a dual function for forensic and identification purposes. We are thinking it's not such a hot idea; having everyone's info all in one place, with a dual purpose, just seems like a bad idea to us. How do you guys feel bout it? [Reuters]


]]>
Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:20:10 EST Haroon Malik http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337131&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FBI to Fight Zombie Hordes, BBC Says ]]> For some reason, when I read "FBI Tries to Fight Zombie Hordes" this morning I really got excited. The idea of an FBI squad hunting smelly, vicious and utterly stupid brain-dead slobs has a certain charm. Sadly, they are not looking for your dorm roommate or my ex-mother-in-law, but for something completely different.

They are just calling a million people with PCs that may have been hijacked by the badies to do evil stuff. Woo-wee. I mean, great. I am sick of spam, but it's going to take a lot more than that to kill the damn bastards. At least this is a good excuse for some great zombies and vampire videos.

A bit from British horror comedy Shaun of the Dead. If you don't have it, get it.

And yes, at last, it's Friday.

Update: here's one who Jason just sent to me. Video guide to survive zombie attacks, by the Shaun of the Dead people. Someone send this to the FBI.

FBI tries to fight zombie hordes [BBC News]

]]>
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:39:05 EDT Addy Dugdale http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=269102&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Proposed Legislation Would Put "Attempted" Pirates in Brig for 1-10 Years ]]> On the same day it announced the 50th conviction stemming from its massive piracy sweep, Operation Fastlink—of a member of the Apocalypse Crew (best known for dropping albums pre-street date)—the Department of Justice proposed new legislation—dubbed the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007—that would punish copyright infringement more harshly than ever, with no distinction between "attempts" and acts. Repeat offenders will suffer "stronger penalties" still.

DoJ's logic for throwing an "attempted" copyright infringer in the slammer for 1-10 years? "It is a general tenet of the criminal law that those who attempt to commit a crime but do not complete it are as morally culpable as those who succeed in doing so." Other "intent" clauses are strewn throughout the bill. Hit the jump to make your eyes pop out of your head.

The new legislation gives more teeth to the DMCA as well, adding forfeiture penalties on top of the 10-year sentence and $1 million fine for criminal violations of its anti-circumvention clauses.

It gets better. The Department of Homeland Security will directly notify the RIAA when pirated CDs are imported and intercepted by the government. Your computer, or anything else "intended to be used in any manner" for criminal copyright infringement is subject to forfeiture, on top of fines and jail time.

And CNET says it best here: "Wiretaps would be authorized for investigations of Americans who are "attempting" to infringe copyrights." I'm glad it's not super easy now or anything. Oh wait.

The DoJ press release's highlights:

• Provide stronger penalties for repeat-offenders of the copyright laws;
• Implement broad forfeiture reforms to ensure the ability to forfeit property derived from or used in the commission of criminal intellectual property offenses;
• Strengthen restitution provisions for certain intellectual property crimes (e.g., criminal copyright and DMCA offenses);
• Ensure that the exportation and transhipment of copyright-infringing goods is a crime, just as the exportation of counterfeit goods is now criminal.
The days of free-flowing copies of Windows XP, Justin Timberlake and Doom 3 seem to be approaching their twilight. Does copyright infringement really merit 10 years in PMITA prison?

Gonzales proposes new crime: 'Attempted' copyright infringement [CNET via Consumerist]
Press Release [DoJ]
Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007 [Politechbot]

]]>
Tue, 15 May 2007 15:14:50 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260732&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tomorrow FBI Will Be Jacked Into Everyone's Internets ]]> Tomorrow is the deadline for ISPs to have their networks wired up with G-Man-mandated surveillance equipment that will make it easier for the FBI to snoop, spy and wiretap the Intertubes, per the FCC's expanded 2002 interpretation of the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act. (Clearly an older law, since it does not make for a catchy acronym.)

The CALEA was originally written to make digital phone lines easier to wiretap. In the case of cellphones, where the tech has "100% penetration, it's credited with boosting the number of court-approved wiretaps a carrier can handle simultaneously, and greatly shortening the time it takes to get a wiretap going," according to Threat Level.

For the low, low price of $164, you can check out the official specs ISPs will use to route over pretty much any "information sent or received through a user's broadband connection, including on-line banking activity" should the FBI be granted a court order to see what's flowing through their (or your) Intertubes.

So, happy surfing tomorrow! And be sure to use emoticons! FBI agents are people too, and I bet a smiling face would really brighten their day.

Reminder: Monday is Wiretap the Internet Day [Threat Level]

]]>
Sun, 13 May 2007 17:15:07 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260035&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Man Sues Microsoft for Failing to Keep His Porn Stash Secure ]]> Sue%20MS.jpg A Connecticut man who was jailed on illegal gun possession is now suing Microsoft, HP, and Circuit City claiming all three companies failed to keep his computer safe from the Feds, who uncovered his porn collection after seizing and cracking into his password-protected PC. Michael Alan Crooker is seeking $200,000 in compensatory and punitive damages, saying MS' Internet Explorer failed to delete his browsing history, which was easily traced back to various porn sites. He's also suing HP and Circuit City for selling him an "insecure" PC. Chances are he won't see a dime from either company, but let that be a lesson to anyone who thinks tossing a file into the Recycle Bin means it's gone forever.

Microsoft Should Have Protected My Porn Stash [Inquirer]

]]>
Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:46:58 EST Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=241676&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fox News: The Gov't Can Use Your Phone as a Hidden Mic ]]> bushphone.jpgHere's a strange story from those paragons of sensible journalism over at Fox News. They claim that the FBI can now use the microphone on your cell phone to listen in on your conversations, even when the phone is turned off. Now, I've heard of special phones that are outfitted to work this way, but all phones? How is that possible? How can the FBI tap into every make of phone on every carrier when the thing is shut completely off and then have it send a signal out to their location without you ever knowing this? Not that I don't have loads of faith in our government, but they don't seem like they have their shit together enough to pull this one off.

I'm guessing that the fact checkers at Fox we're too busy changing "holiday" to "Christmas" on all their scripts to figure out that the FBI replaces the phones of people they are tracking with specially outfitted models. And I'm hoping I'm right, as otherwise that's some seriously creepy and privacy-invading business right there. Just to be safe I'm wrapping my phone in foam when I'm not using it, as there is no way I want the government knowing what I order at Subway.

Check the video report after the jump, and leave any extra info you have on this shady rumor in comments.


FBI Using Cell Phones to Spy on You? [TechEBlog]

]]>
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:07:00 EST www.gizmodo.com http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222906&view=rss&microfeed=true