<![CDATA[Gizmodo: Fear]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: Fear]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/fear http://gizmodo.com/tag/fear <![CDATA[ Quantum Sleeper, Rest Well in the Face of Terrorism ]]> Some might call being trapped in a small, airtight box getting buried alive. Others realize that it's a completely rational response to the potential threats in a post-9/11 world. Featuring 1.25" polycarbonate bulletproof plating, the Quantum Sleeper seals you into your mattress in emergency situations. You breathe filtered O2, use the built-in facilities and wait comfortably for the world to not be over. Sound a bit unsettling? No way. Just look at that happy couple basking in their thoughtful preparation, the husband grabbing his wife lovingly, always ready to perform the Heimlich should the opportunity arise. [product via boingboing]

]]>
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:25:00 EDT Mark Wilson http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373321&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gadget Use Compromises Your Security Says The Washington Post ]]> The Washington Post is running a front page article today on the perils of letting gadgets take over your life. The article predicts doom and gloom for a society that has become too reliant on scary-sounding technologies like RFID, GPS and Google. Data mining companies will use your Amazon shopping habits to tailor products that you may want directly to you. Horrors!

The article, written by one Ellen Nakashima, does a good job of scaring the pants off its readers, but it really doesn't offer any sort of alternative. So cellphone towers can track our position even after a call has finished. Are we then supposed to stop using cellphone entirely? EZ Pass (or your state's equivalent automatic toll service) collects data on where you've been. Should we then wait in line for long periods of time because people cannot find correct change?

Gadgets are your friend. There's no need to be all Henny Penny about them. Which way to the iPhone (which surely must be Apple's tool to take over the world)?

Enjoying Technology's Conveniences But Not Escaping Its Watchful Eyes [Washington Post]

]]>
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:51:35 EST Gizloco http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228913&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Popular Antivirus Apps Don't Work 80% of the Time ]]> hivlifecycle-thumb.jpgFeeling all smug, snug and secure because you have antivirus software running on that PC of yours? Think again. Graham Ingram, the general manager of Australia's Computer Emergency Response Team says the most popular antivirus applications are about as impregnable as a screen door in a submarine, letting 80% of the creepy crawlies through.

Ingram didn't mention them by name, but the three leading antivirus applications are Symantec with 53.6% of the market, McAfee with 18.8%, and Trend Micro with 13.8%. On the other hand, one antivirus package he did mention by name was the Russian application Kaspersky, which he said blocks of 90% of viruses and Trojans.

There was also no mention of the performance hit antivirus software claims from your system. It's a shame that so many people are using useless applications such as Symantec antivirus software. The cure is worse than the disease. The funny thing is, viruses don't come to get you, you have to actively infect yourself with them. And, by the time any of these bullshit apps figure out how to deal with ever more masterfully-written viruses, the horse is already out of the barn. But just to be safe, don't use Internet Explorer and don't click on any attachments, and you'll be far more likely to be virus-free than if you're depending on any of these fraudulent applications. Or, you could just get a Mac.

Why popular antivirus apps 'do not work' [ZDNet Australia, via The Consumerist]

]]>
Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:36:55 EDT Charlie White http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=191823&view=rss&microfeed=true