Airplane assembly wasn't a dude thing back in WWII. My great-grandmother riveted B-24s together at Willow Run airport near Detroit and had some good stories to tell. Due to her small size, she could squeeze into places none of the men could and was very good at her job.
@Will Nickelson: You do know there are two funnys, right? Like, one is Eddie Izzard, the other is what milk smells like a week after the expiration date. We're using the latter here.
If I could fly a jet fighter I'd be the happiest boy in the world. Too bad you can't be colorblind and allowed to fly those things. Stupid beautiful beautiful worthless eyes of mine.
Edited by Xterm11: ESCAPED YOUR HYPERLINK at 07/10/09 10:32 PM
Xterm11: ESCAPED YOUR HYPERLINK was starred
Xterm11: ESCAPED YOUR HYPERLINK was unstarred
Edited by Xterm11: ESCAPED YOUR HYPERLINK at 07/10/09 10:36 PM
Xterm11: ESCAPED YOUR HYPERLINK was starred
Xterm11: ESCAPED YOUR HYPERLINK was unstarred
People who ask why we need this plane, are the same kind of people who ask why we need the military. The idea isn't that we want to use the equipment, the idea is that we keep the force ready so that ideally we discourage people from making us use it.
The planes these are replacing have reached the end of their airframe life.
@Lite: supports Bacon Salt...And so should you.: It's not like we are nor do we need to keep the actual 1970's era F-15's maintained, it just seems like we can build new F-15E's with upgraded avionics and still maintain air dominance. At the very least certainly no plane's come close to matching the F-22, so why the need to spend the billions to get the next generation already.
Turn and burn lots of cash. Great plane but like a recently acquired PC its tech is obsolete. Granted it surpasses anything out there but unless it can detect a nuclear brief case at 50,000 feet. It can only look forward to smaller and smaller budget. The UAVs are coming and the A 10s can will be upgraded.
An awesome plane, for sure, though I wish the geniuses developed a more original name.
The F-35 is called the Lightning II for a reason. The original P-38 Lightning was an aircraft flown by the US in WWII. It was primarily a highly maneuverable and fast fighter bomber, thanks to its twin-engine design.
While the F-35 does have some similarities in function to the P-38, it's an entirely different aircraft. A single, jet engine. Stealth. Mostly designed for air-to-air combat, since I doubt you'll be able to cram a ton of bombs (literally) onto its tiny airframe. The most important part is the VTOL (vertical take-off & landing) aspect of the F-35, pioneered by the Harrier and Osprey. The P-38 could definitely not take off or land vertically. The Harrier II would be a much better fit, even though the Harrier has more structural resemblance to the F-4 Phantom.
Sorry for the aero-geek tirade, but I do loves me my planes. And the shows Dogfights & Battle 360 on the History Channel!
@UnderLoK: I suppose for the same reasons we needed F-40 Warhawks, P-51 Mustangs, P-38 Lightnings, F-4U Corsairs, the Douglas SBD Dauntless Divebomber, Superfortress, the B-25 Mitchell, the F6F-5K Hellcat et al.
07/11/09
07/11/09
They don't waste a perfectly good brand new aircraft on flying around being pretty.
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
with skills, ingenuity, that's top of the line.
They think they're cool 'cause they call themselves "mates"
but they prob'ly bought the parts in the United States
07/10/09
Those Aussies fancy that a jet,
But the we know they ain't seen nothin' yet,
It may be the choice of the Angels, Blue,
But it's got nothin' on the F-22.
07/10/09
That F-22 is much over-hyped
you didn't know that, as you typed.
In their pants, the Aussies will pee,
when they observe our F-23.
07/10/09
07/10/09
07/10/09
Please my friend, don't give me sass,
As your avatar shows that your head's up your ass.
07/10/09
If you pause the video with 15 seconds left,
It shows the night sky, now you mustn't feel deft.
07/10/09
Now now, xterm, try to be civil!
This guy may be daft, but don't spam out this drivel!
07/10/09
Please nerdtalker take no offense,
I am just rhyming to make me less tense.
07/11/09
What is it, my friend? I've got no hunch,
As to what's got your panties in a bunch.
07/10/09
07/10/09
03/02/09
The planes these are replacing have reached the end of their airframe life.
03/02/09
03/02/09
The point is to stay ahead of people, not keep up w/ them.
Pretty much it's government funded research that eventually ends up in public domain for other companies to use for profit/technology advancement.
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
The F-35 is called the Lightning II for a reason. The original P-38 Lightning was an aircraft flown by the US in WWII. It was primarily a highly maneuverable and fast fighter bomber, thanks to its twin-engine design.
While the F-35 does have some similarities in function to the P-38, it's an entirely different aircraft. A single, jet engine. Stealth. Mostly designed for air-to-air combat, since I doubt you'll be able to cram a ton of bombs (literally) onto its tiny airframe. The most important part is the VTOL (vertical take-off & landing) aspect of the F-35, pioneered by the Harrier and Osprey. The P-38 could definitely not take off or land vertically. The Harrier II would be a much better fit, even though the Harrier has more structural resemblance to the F-4 Phantom.
Sorry for the aero-geek tirade, but I do loves me my planes. And the shows Dogfights & Battle 360 on the History Channel!
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
Why do we need the F22 again?
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09
03/02/09