<![CDATA[Gizmodo: firearms]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: firearms]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/firearms http://gizmodo.com/tag/firearms <![CDATA[Half-Life Played With Real Guns Is Jack Thompson's Wet Dream]]> I have, and always will, reflexively defend videogames against annoying "murder simulator" rhetoric, but the guys at Waterloo Labs, who have figured out how to use actual firearms to play first person shooters, aren't making my life any easier.

The setup is dead simple, all puns intended: Four accelerometers are stuck to a hard wall, where your FPS is projected in real time. Players shoot said wall, with guns. The intensity of the vibrations in each accelerometer is measured to determine where exactly on the board the bullet impacted, which is fed into the host PC, where the coordinate data is translated into an aimed, ingame shot. It works a lot better than you might expect, not just with bullets, but with shovels, too.

If you belong to the very select demographic of people who own a gun, a projector, some lab equipment, and have access to firing range, as well as some some expertise in DIY building and programming languages, Waterloo Labs (predictable tagline: DIY Projects from the Heart of Texas!) provides instructions so you can build this setup yourself. Note: They haven't totally worked out the bugs in the respawn code yet, so aim carefully. [Waterloo Labs via Slashdot]

UPDATE: Jack Thompson is not impressed! Also, incapable of processing anything that is not completely literal:

John, you're terribly confused. Something that further glamorizes killing humans in virtual reality would not be my wet dream. That would be Strauss Zelnick's wet dream.

I'm the guy who opposes this stuff, who has lobbied against it for ten years, and who has been doing everything I can to stop massacres, not foster them.

So just how would what I oppose give me a wet dream? And why would you use such a gross image?

Well, the answer to both questions is in this answer: You have no earthly idea what you are talking about and you have a Jack Thompson obession.

Please report my response to your idiotic headline. [Ed note: Gladly!]

This is the best.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5332305&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Many Hard Drives Does It Take to Stop a .50 Caliber Armor Piercing Round?]]> HardOCP gleefully answers this, the least pressing question of our time, with science. Video after the jump, NSFW for language, guns, and ridiculous blaring death metal.

[HardOCP via Digg]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5180227&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Firearms Work In Super-Slow-Motion]]> Sometimes I notice that I take technology for granted. All these machines doing things around us, cars running, planes flying, phones ringing, computers—ahm, humm—computing, and guns firing, but how do they really work? What's the deal with their mechanics? Do you think they work with magic? Did Steve tell you that, per chance? Well, take one out of the list, Steve, because here's how weapons fire in super-slow-oh-you-are-killing-me motion.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045291&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[NYPD Sharp Shooters May Get Cameras on their Guns]]> Officers of the NYPD may be forced to carry cameras on their guns, if a Brooklyn senator gets his way. Following a spate of controversial shootings, democrat Eric Adams—a former cop himself—has proposed the addition of a $700 gadget, insisting that it will improve public confidence in the police force. Before being adopted, however, the city's SWAT teams will take part in a pilot scheme. More details of the idea, which has already been mooted in DC, below.

As soon as the officer draws his weapon, a red laser light on the five-ounce attachment shoots out, although this can be disabled if the cop feels it might put him in danger, for example, if he or she is in a dimly-lit situation. The camera can continue filming whatever is in the gun's path for up to an hour after being drawn.

Senator Adams, who never once used a gun during his 21 years on the beat, reckons the idea could bolster public confidence in the police. "We believe the state of New York can lead the country," he said. "There no longer can be a question mark that lingers after shootings." There is, as I see it, however, one tiny flaw. If the camera can be turned off by the guy on the right end of the gun—ie, the cop— doesn't that make the system open to potential abuse? [Telegraph]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=390258&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gun Hidden in a Knife: It's Two, Two, Two Kills In One]]> Just what we need: more weapons and even better, increasingly innovative ways to murder and maim each other. With this G.R.A.D. $699 .22-caliber gun disguised as a knife, you can pull the trigger on the handle, filling someone with five holes and then cut them up into little pieces, or vice-versa. Check out the video of this lean, mean killing machine:


Now all we need to do is combine this with the cellphone gun for the ultimate convergence device. Anyway, this thing looks cheap, as if it could easily blow up in your hand.

(Video) .22-Caliber Knife Gun [Tech E Blog]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=219363&view=rss&microfeed=true