Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
| posts about #flamebait more → |
Almost Nobody Owns Just Macs |
Weekend Flame War: Canon or Nikon? |
Geeks Support Obama |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
Gizmodo 
10/06/09
Apple and OSX infuriate me sometimes though. Over the past few weeks 4 out of the 5 people in my household got iPod Touchs/iPhones (I'm the 5th). As I programmer I figured that since I have access to a wealth of dev machines now I might try some app programming. I then learn that Apple in their infinite wisdom (read: dickishness) have locked app development to OSX.
Well screw you Apple, I'm not interested enough in your platform to buy a new machine for.
END RANT
10/06/09
10/06/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
15% of 12% = 1.8%
10/05/09
He writes "of the 12% of homes with a Mac, less than 2% are Mac-exclusive."
... the "of" means that the "12% of homes with a Mac" becomes 100% of the subset in which he's distinguishing between Mac-exclusive vs. Mac+PC.
100% (the 12% subset of homes with Macs) - 85% (the % of that subset with Mac + PC) = 15% (households that are Mac-only within the subset of homes that have at least one Mac).
Also, if you go beyond the math, doesn't it also make common sense: if only 2% of Mac-owning households were Mac exclusive, that would mean virtually everyone with a Mac would also have a PC. That doesn't seem to be true in real life, but an 85% (mixed) / 15% (exclusive) split among Mac owners is credible.
10/05/09
John writes "of the 12% of homes with a Mac, less than 2% are Mac-exclusive."
But the study says "Of those 12 percent, nearly 85 percent also own a Windows-based PC."
Wouldn't that mean of the 12% of homes with a Mac, a little more than 15% are Mac-exclusive (not 2%)?
10/05/09
Another way of looking at that is 10.2% of homes with computers own both a MAC and a Windows based computer.
10/05/09
10/05/09
But of the subset of households that own Macs (12% of total households, or 100% of households with Macs), if 85% of them also own PCs, that's 85% of 100% of the households with Macs, leaving 15% not 2% of the subset of households with Macs exclusively Mac.
No?
10/05/09
10/05/09
(my emphasis. he didn't say total homes, he said homes with a mac, which gives the wrong stat).
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
*Yes I know Macs can get viruses/worms too.
10/05/09
10/05/09
Yesterday I wanted to watch an out of market football game that I couldn't get here in MN. Bootcamped into Vista and loaded up Sopcast/TVU Player. I've been looking for an OS X version of something like that for a bit but I can't seem to find anything like it-especially one that lets me record what I'm watching.
*And if you want some other examples-browse Lifehacker on a daily basis. You always see some nice software that they come across and the first sentence will read Windows Only. It's not all the time-they have others that say "OS X only/Linux only". One aspect I LOVE about OS X is the amount of freeware made for it. It's second to none (except linux, blah blah blah)
10/06/09
I know these are specific issues, and it has gotten a LOT better in recent years. I know basic users can get away with just mac, but to suggest that anyone can do anything they need to do on a mac is a bit shortsighted.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Just sayin...
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Besides, we are talking household - the wife has a PC.