@OCEntertainment: Dude, I hear ya. I feel bad (on the inside) for even stating that. I wholly h8 that line but, as I said to my last GF: you've left me no choice. #wink
So... does anyone plan to pick up a copy of her memoirs? I find it interesting that this person was able to produce a 413-page book. Note the lack of a co-author named on the title: #wink
@Hello Mister Walrus: Meh. People seem to forget that politicians are generally moderately intelligent people. I mean, most of them have degrees in something. They aren't total dumbasses, so I suppose one could write a book.
I'm tired, don't criticise me too much. -_-
@DustyButt™: I would wager that elected representatives are generally more intelligent than the average voter that they represent. However, they are not comparable to the university professors or other smart people whose jobs are to analyze the government or to write books about politics.
On second thought, I don't think Sarah Palin is necessarily unintelligent - obviously some kind of manipulation was necessary to become the governor of a state. I do think that her past rhetoric implies horrifying ignorance about the world outside of her constituency. #wink
@Hello Mister Walrus: There have been some interesting studies on what types of people get elected in different societies. The US favors lawyers whereas China favors engineers. So the issue is not intelligence as much as what type of knowledge the leaders bring to the table. Sarah Palin may be intelligent, but she is clearly ignorant. Her lack of qualifications is her defining feature. That and her unnatural lack of self-doubt. #wink
@tharden33: I believe we are getting pretty damn tired of hearing Tina Fey's line spit out everytime this chick comes up. It was funny the first hundred times, but now it's just annoying as all hell. #wink
@Cash907Censored: Well, considering it was Palin, not Fey, who said ""They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska." then, no, it is not annoying yet to highlight actual stupid quotes from politicians. #wink
@Mike Zuniga: That was Unexpected: 3.0 is backward compatible with 2.0 but I don't know about older 1.1 hardware. Also 3.0 has more contact areas. #supertalent
@Mike Zuniga: That was Unexpected: Yeah I remember reading something that it would work like that, but as a bonus you get the higher power provided to 2.0 devices, making them charge even faster. #supertalent
@bagellord:
DVDs store 4.8gb...and a lot of it is used up by menus and other crap. I guess there are dual layer DVDs but most of the time that is not used to give you better picture quality.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was Full MPEG-2 "quality."
It'd be nice if they gave us the HD version on a larger drive...I don't understand why in this day and age I can't get HD movies sans Blu-Ray...the HD content on iTunes isn't actually HD.
@trickflip1: Except it's not an image of the dvd like an ISO. It's the video_ts folder. I also like having the menu structure so that if my disk is messed up I can easily create a new one.
PS - not sure where the processor thing came from but I have a 3.0GHz Core 2 Duo in my iMac. The bottleneck for me copying a movie is the crappily slow DVD drive.
@bagellord: Oh, I was just simply saying if you had the time to test it, that it might take longer if you don't have a multi-core processor.
I, for example, am still using a Prescott P4 in my laptop as well as my current desktop setup. So it naturally takes me a long, long time to rip a DVD.
My mentioning of the file size was merely to state that it is possible for them to have a full DVD-quality video on the flash drive, given that the file size would be no larger than 2.2GB.
All I was saying is that I'm sure the flash drive does not contain the DVD iso. That I was sure it just contains a DVD quality "rip" of the movie itself, maybe a few special features as separate videos.
However, after someone saying they read the video will only take up 1.0 GB, it sounds like it will be less than DVD quality, or a "digital" copy like so many movies come with now.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Mistake number two: Letting a first-year Photoshop student do your graphic design. Seriously, guys? Gradient, Outer Glow, done-and-done?
At least make the red-black gradient favor the red a little more so your gross text doesn't fade into the background there, dude.
Then again, polish a turd... #wink
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
.....Ugh. Caffeine. #wink
11/16/09
11/16/09
So... does anyone plan to pick up a copy of her memoirs? I find it interesting that this person was able to produce a 413-page book. Note the lack of a co-author named on the title: #wink
11/16/09
I'm tired, don't criticise me too much. -_-
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
1. Own up to your ignorance
2. Own up to your sarcasm
3. Cover your ignorance by saying you we're being sarcastic
The comment smacks of joke to me, but dumber things have been said before. #wink
11/16/09
On second thought, I don't think Sarah Palin is necessarily unintelligent - obviously some kind of manipulation was necessary to become the governor of a state. I do think that her past rhetoric implies horrifying ignorance about the world outside of her constituency. #wink
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
But that's not as ridiculous, I guess. #wink
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Post the clip then. #wink
11/16/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
However, there are those that value pornography. #supertalent
11/04/09
I'll live inside one of these. I call the 128 GB. :) #supertalent
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
10/12/09
DVDs store 4.8gb...and a lot of it is used up by menus and other crap. I guess there are dual layer DVDs but most of the time that is not used to give you better picture quality.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was Full MPEG-2 "quality."
It'd be nice if they gave us the HD version on a larger drive...I don't understand why in this day and age I can't get HD movies sans Blu-Ray...the HD content on iTunes isn't actually HD.
10/12/09
10/12/09
Use Handbrake and rip a DVD's main Title (the movie alone) and check out the size difference. Rip it at full DVD resolution even.
Of course if you don't have a multi-core processor, it may take quite a long while to do it.
10/12/09
10/12/09
PS - not sure where the processor thing came from but I have a 3.0GHz Core 2 Duo in my iMac. The bottleneck for me copying a movie is the crappily slow DVD drive.
10/13/09
I, for example, am still using a Prescott P4 in my laptop as well as my current desktop setup. So it naturally takes me a long, long time to rip a DVD.
My mentioning of the file size was merely to state that it is possible for them to have a full DVD-quality video on the flash drive, given that the file size would be no larger than 2.2GB.
All I was saying is that I'm sure the flash drive does not contain the DVD iso. That I was sure it just contains a DVD quality "rip" of the movie itself, maybe a few special features as separate videos.
However, after someone saying they read the video will only take up 1.0 GB, it sounds like it will be less than DVD quality, or a "digital" copy like so many movies come with now.
10/11/09
10/11/09