<![CDATA[Gizmodo: flaws]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: flaws]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/flaws http://gizmodo.com/tag/flaws <![CDATA[Defective Nvidia Graphics Cards Confirmed in Desktops]]> Really Nvidia, what the hell? After steadfastly arguing that its defective graphics cards were limited to notebooks only—they've even sent me a lovely email or two reiterating that claim—HP has just confirmed that 38 different desktop models are plagued with faulty Nvidia graphics cards.

This is on the heels of Apple concluding that MacBook Pros manufactured between May 2007 and last month also pack the fail-prone cards, despite Nvidia's assurance earlier that it was unaffected. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but this is second major contradiction to an earlier Nvidia claim. Nvidia says that there's "no conclusive evidence that the failure mechanism is the same as the notebook issue," but uh, it doesn't look so great, guys.

Nvidia really needs to come clean with the score now—exactly which cards are affected, whose computers they're in, everything. Their near total silence on this while individual computer makers cleanup is absolutely ridiculous. [PC Pro via Slashdot]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5063105&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Adobe Knew of Vista PWN 2 OWN Hack All Along]]> The PWN 2OWN contest, as we all know, saw the Mac OS X weed crumble first, with Vista following soon after. Ubuntu was the only OS that was impenetrable to attack, but news is surfacing that Vista should have had a longer lifeline, if only Adobe had patched the flaw they knew about all along.


Yup, it's true; Adobe not only knew about the security flaw that Shane Macaulay used to hack Vista, they even had a patched prepared. Only thing is, they hadn't got round to releasing it. In fact, the patch was scheduled for release in the next Flash Player update later in the month.

Thankfully, Adobe were not in the dark about the security risk, however, if they were in the know, don't you guys think they have a responsibility to release the fix ASAP? Putting our systems at unnecessary risk due to our choice to support third party software just doesn't seem fair. Further, asking for system stability and security to be made a priority should be a given at all times, or so we reckon. Worse still, the defect may have cost Vista the title of impenetrable OS, and that's gonna hurt the MS fanboys dearly. After all, imagine if OS X had been the only hacked operating system; we think said fanboys may have had something to brag about, or at least a reason to punch Mr Smug Mac in his face. [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376585&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Apple Acknowledges the MacBook Shutdown Flaw]]> Apple has finally acknowledged that there is a slight problem with some of the MacBooks out there. Random Shutdown Syndrome (RSS) has been plaguing MacBook owners for quite some time. A recent firmware update was supposed to fix it, but it didn't. So what does Apple say about it? "Just call us and we'll figure something out." Real classy, Apple. Hit up our compadres over at Consumerist for some more details about RSS.

Support Page [Apple]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=199175&view=rss&microfeed=true