Vizios arent terrible but they are sub-par, and that's coming from me, a cheap-skate. My aunt who knows nothing bought one and was impressed by the size and clear picture, so that is technically what they are getting. I mean, if you don't go out and examine every HDTV then I'd guess you'd probably be pretty happy with it. As for me, I will wait until I have enough money for one of the Deals of the Day Tv's on here. Hopefully something 47" and somewhere along panasonic or toshiba quality.
The image quality of Vizios can't compare to the premium brands. But they're no bad at all. I bought a 26' refurb for $250 from Buy.com and I'm pretty happy with it. The big question is: will it last a while before something goes wrong with it?
@tande04: Patent disputes are rarely about tech actually being stolen. Often, you have cases of parallel though or readily available methods that someone happens to patent in hopes of blocking competition.
If the dispute goes away, Sharp can sell TV's here. That means more competition, no?
Vizio is picking up the specs nicely on their LCDs (240 hz LED). Even though I probably wouldn't buy a Vizio, hopefully the competition should push the price down on similarly speced sets from premium manufacturers.
@my name is jonas: I think Vizio is taking aim at the big boys and proving you can put out decent quality and not gouge people for it. I give them another generation or 2 before they really step things up and offer more comparable features (i.e. ports and inputs) for less than their big name competitors
@Cordfucious of Tech Clan: The question remains if they can deliver a quality product. The tech is great as long as the consumer doesn't have to constantly call for tech support.
@Cordfucious of Tech Clan: I'm still not going for one, as I still never have seen one that impresses me.
But, if you do want a deal, go for a Panasonic Viera. there are various levels of them, but they have some pretty inexpensive models as well and from what I have seen (though it was a high end model) Vizio doesn't really even compare.
@Dr. Evil Genius: I don't think they have a reliability issue. I just think their tech is not top notch, how could it be. I doubt they have the R&D budget of they big boys, but for what they are working with they have a formula that's hard to beat right now. I think they are on the way up to tier 2 status very quickly
If it is as you say, John, then it is a hollow victory on par with being awarded a judgment against a bankrupt defendant. It sounds like Funai has a fancy piece of paper and Vizio may have a write-off of indeterminate value.
Of course, I do personal-injury law not IP law but an empty judgment is an empty judgment.
Congratulations to the attorneys involved for generating legal fees in connection with a feigned issue.
As a lawyer-in-training, I can say with some reasonable certainty, John, that you are correct. After reading the article, it is apparent that Funai filed a suit with a claim against chipsets in televisions that are no longer in use by Vizio; they screwed up. The suit should have been more encompassing of relative technology. This is not to say, however, that Vizio's road in the near-future will not be a rocky one. The appeals process may be lengthy, but the most important part will be whether the ITC will the stay the order on the exclusion of the ban. This will determine whether Vizio can still sell TVs at all while it appeals.
@dc-united: It's loud. It's get's hotter than hell. It's a power hog. Oh, and it has a bizarre habit of turning on unexpectedly which can have really bad consequences if you have one enclosed in a cabinet.
But, yeah, for the money you get an excellent HDMI 1.3 capable BluRay player and Some pretty damn good games.
@jdbaile3: Not really. We're starting to see standalone players that are more full featured than the PS3, with load times just as fast as the PS3, and cheaper than the PS3.
It's also going to depend upon your audio system. If it doesn't accept PCM audio via HDMI, but you do have multi-channel inputs; you'd want a blu-ray player that decodes HD audio and has multi-channel outputs. If you have a really nice receiver with HDMI, you'd want a blu-ray player that can bitstream the HD audio to your receiver and let it do the decoding vs. the PS3 which can not bit stream hd audio.
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
Don't steal other people's shit.
07/09/09
If the dispute goes away, Sharp can sell TV's here. That means more competition, no?
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
07/09/09
But, if you do want a deal, go for a Panasonic Viera. there are various levels of them, but they have some pretty inexpensive models as well and from what I have seen (though it was a high end model) Vizio doesn't really even compare.
07/09/09
07/09/09
Well this is kind of lame...
If this means cheaper TVs than I'm in.
06/10/09
Fixed.
06/10/09
Of course, I do personal-injury law not IP law but an empty judgment is an empty judgment.
Congratulations to the attorneys involved for generating legal fees in connection with a feigned issue.
06/10/09
06/10/09
06/10/09
Imported to wear, if the International Trade Commission said this and they are international. And President of what? A country, the Commission, Vizio?
06/10/09
06/10/09
04/11/09
11/19/08
11/19/08
11/19/08
For some folks (like me) it isn't quite what I need to fit into my home theater for a variety of reasons.
11/19/08
But, yeah, for the money you get an excellent HDMI 1.3 capable BluRay player and Some pretty damn good games.
FYI: Don't flame me. I own one.
11/19/08
It's also going to depend upon your audio system. If it doesn't accept PCM audio via HDMI, but you do have multi-channel inputs; you'd want a blu-ray player that decodes HD audio and has multi-channel outputs. If you have a really nice receiver with HDMI, you'd want a blu-ray player that can bitstream the HD audio to your receiver and let it do the decoding vs. the PS3 which can not bit stream hd audio.
11/19/08