@nutbastard: Yup. If you do everything right, you have a virtual romantic evening with a hott e-lady-of-the-night. If you screw up, you get the same virtual romance holodeck experience except your virtual pee pee cannot get an e-rection, and you are virtually humiliated. And then when you try to explain it to her, she just laughs at you for telling a pair of glasses that you've just had too much wine. #ar
@NightInfinity: Yes, that was a concept video, but I'm very happy to hear that it's been put to real life application at last. I think this is one of the better immediate uses for AR tech.
As something like an engine is assembled in a relatively standard way, it should be easy for the software to recognize parts, and what it is looking at - I also think it would be pretty easy to slap a sticker with a glyph onto parts to ID them and give a little orientation data to a system like this if needed. #ar
Problem is that mechanics need their hands to be able to go in tight spots.
Hell, what happens when you slip trying to loosen/tighten something and break it? "Guess I'm not fixing this today!" . How about how easy it'll be to smuggle these to the enemy? lol! #ar
@CoHPhasor: They're written at an eight grade English level. How much easier can you get? Though you have a point, half the shit I used to have to fix on aircraft way never in a good place to stick your hands. You usually ended up doing it by feel, then using an inspection mirror to see if you did it right. That's the problem with engineers, they don't have to work on the stuff they draw up on paper. Yes, my aircraft was designed on paper, not computers..... #ar
@malaklaze: I'm sure someone could do it as a proof of concept. It's incredibly unlikely to be usable, though. The Android software spec requires that you have a few real buttons (I think the Home, Back, and Search buttons are among them). Which, clearly, the iPhone never will.
It would be an awkward hack at best. Unless you're doing it for the sole goal of gloat and glee, I wouldn't recommend it.
@krische: Best idea would be to make each of the different UIs portable. Sense, Blur, stock Android. Alas, I doubt HTC and Motorola will be as open with their custom UIs. I mean, that's cool. It's what makes their products different, gives them their competitive edge, so I can understand why.
@yeti: I have a spectrum analyser for 2.4GHz radio bands and I checked out some BT gear on it... Wi-fi is pretty weak compared to a cel phone, but compared to Wi-fi, Bluetooth barely shows up as a smattering of background noise.
So I'd wondered the same, but looking at it, BT is really negligible. You will literally get more radiation in the same frequency band by standing in the same room as a properly working microwave oven while using it.
The incidence of cancer in our world is WAY up over the historic rate. And cancer is virtually unknown in undeveloped areas of the planet. Coincidence?
@Bandit: I think you have to account for differences in life spans and detection rates if you want to compare the "developed" world to other areas or historical rates. If you don't have CT scans, MRIs, constant mammograms, colonoscopies, and prostate exams, you aren't going to realize/record that what killed someone was unchecked cancer. And, if you're dying because of bad water, bad nutrition, constant warfare, etc, you're less likely to live long enough to get cancer. For all we know, "old age deaths" from times before x-rays, proper autopsies, and the like could actually be cancer deaths.
The SAR limit is in the US is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1g of tissue. Everywhere else in the world it is 2.0 W/kg averaged over 10g of tissue. The US has the most strict standard in the world.
I don't understand the units of measurement. Watts/Kilogram. Who gives a shit how much the phone weighs. The radiation is the only thing you care about.
Since I'm married I am developing some "man cans", however I would personally rather have a tumor on my breast than on my brain. Also, did it state it was a constant radiation, or was it while the device is being used? I could see smartphones giving off more than others with wifi/3G/GPS and the like being accessed more frequently and also while calls aren't being made.
Then again, if your friends can talk on their phone while it's in their bra... bravo.
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
As something like an engine is assembled in a relatively standard way, it should be easy for the software to recognize parts, and what it is looking at - I also think it would be pretty easy to slap a sticker with a glyph onto parts to ID them and give a little orientation data to a system like this if needed. #ar
10/27/09
Hell, what happens when you slip trying to loosen/tighten something and break it? "Guess I'm not fixing this today!" . How about how easy it'll be to smuggle these to the enemy? lol! #ar
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/29/09
.... O,O lies! #ar
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/27/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
It would be an awkward hack at best. Unless you're doing it for the sole goal of gloat and glee, I wouldn't recommend it.
10/09/09
I love the Sense, but love the physical keyboard and faster processor of the moment.
10/09/09
Still would be kinda cool.
10/09/09
[forum.xda-developers.com]
10/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
So I'd wondered the same, but looking at it, BT is really negligible. You will literally get more radiation in the same frequency band by standing in the same room as a properly working microwave oven while using it.
09/09/09
09/09/09
10/06/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
09/09/09
10/06/09
Since I'm married I am developing some "man cans", however I would personally rather have a tumor on my breast than on my brain. Also, did it state it was a constant radiation, or was it while the device is being used? I could see smartphones giving off more than others with wifi/3G/GPS and the like being accessed more frequently and also while calls aren't being made.
Then again, if your friends can talk on their phone while it's in their bra... bravo.