<![CDATA[Gizmodo: g86]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: g86]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/g86 http://gizmodo.com/tag/g86 <![CDATA[Dell Extends Warranties for Laptops With Failing Nvidia Chips While Nvidia Stays Mum]]> A major cause of frustration in the Nvidia notebook GPU fiasco—where "significant quantities" of notebook graphics cards are packaged with "weak" materials leading them to overheat and fail at a "higher-than-normal rate"—is that Nvidia is declining to identify exactly which chips are bad, as the WSJ notes today. So you've gotta find out from your notebook maker if you're possibly stuck with a time bomb. Dell is extending its limited warranties by a year to deal with the issue in the following notebooks:



Even if, as Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang says, that different notebook configurations and designs affect how the flameout will rear its head, it doesn't really excuse not disclosing the exact chips affected—widely believed to be of the G84 and G86 variety—and this effective silence is largely why rumors that most of their mobile GeForce 8 series is bad are able to gain traction, despite Nvidia's protests. Some actual information would go a long way in quelling them.

In the meantime, a BIOS fix that will simply delay or reduce the chance of the onset of the problem by kicking on the cooling fans earlier is an incomplete solution. We hope Dell is "going to take care of [their] customers" as promised. Ideally, since they (presumably) have the information about which specific configurations are at the greatest risk, they would notify those customers and offer to replace the card entirely, otherwise those customers are basically waiting for their cards to die. [WSJ, Dell]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038776&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Proof Nvidia Desktop G86 Graphics Cards Affected by Materials Defects?]]> The extent of the problems plaguing Nvidia's graphics cards is still controversial, though the company has confirmed that "weak" materials have caused "higher-than-normal" fail rates in certain mobile GPUs, which appear to be the G84 and G86-based graphics cards. The Inquirer said those issues extended to the desktop as well, which Nvidia denied. Interestingly, VR-Zone is reporting that Nvidia has issued a product change notification to customers that they're changing the underfill material for their desktop G86 chips from Namics 8439-1 to Hitachi 3730. Could mean nothing, but since their original problems stemmed from "weak" materials, it stands out. Is there a non-conspiratorial reason they would do this? Update: Nvidia wrote us to respond to the rumors:

1) The issue is limited to a few notebook chips only; we have not seen and don't expect to see this issue on any NVIDIA based desktops

2) Only a very small percentage of the notebook chips that have shipped are potentially affected and the problem depends on a combination of environmental conditions, configuration and usage model

3) We continue to work closely with our partners and have taken the necessary steps to ensure that all NVIDIA chips currently in production do not exhibit the problem

[VR-Zone]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037070&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nvidia Denies Imminent Epidemic of Graphics Chip Combustion]]> Took a little longer than I expected, but Nvidia has come around to denying that basically every GeForce 8400-8700 graphics card powered by the G84 and G86 chipset is a flawed, ticking timebomb, waiting to die from overheating issues. They say that the problem affects "only a very small percentage of the notebook chips that have shipped" and that "the problem depends on a combination of environmental conditions, configuration, and usage model."

While there's no immediate way to tell if Nvidia is in fact lying (which would be a massively boneheaded move), as the Inquirer alleged, we'll know in the coming months. Reports of massive chip failures and an even larger hit to Nvidia's financials than the $150-$200 million it already took would make it super obvious. Hopefully the Inquirer was just being bombastic and British. [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025792&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nvidia G84 GPUs Right Around the Corner?]]> If you haven't been able to get your hands on one of those GeForce 8800 GTX cards we've shown you (or if you just can't afford them), you might want to hold off for a bit. Seems like Nvidia's forthcoming G84 and G86 GPUs for the entry level and mid range crowd are on target for a Q1 release. The chips will be derived from the current G80 and will have less real pipelines than their counterparts, but in turn they'll be priced in the $199 to $249 range, which considering the cost of the current 8800 cards sounds good to us.

G84 is the Next Nvidia Chip [via The Inquirer]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=219336&view=rss&microfeed=true