You should include also some iconic VAIOs, like the Picturebook or the X505 Extreme.
And there are many other interesting models like the TR (first glossy screen/AR coating), TX (first led display in a notebook and first 16:9 in a notebook) and SZ (first with switchable graphics).
What's with the PSP hate? You left it off of the Game Boy timeline even though you mentioned the Lynx and GameGear on that one, and now you are leaving it off of the Sony one?
I just KNEW the Mark II had to have been used to shoot Obama! I mean, when and if *I* get to shoot the President, that's the daddy-o I'm using. I'd DIE for the chance to get to shoot the President!!! Who wouldn't?! I don't want to sound all "stalky" but if I were living in D.C., I'm so excited about this new President I'd probably sneak and camp out all over the capitol just waiting for that "perfect unimpeded shot" which I'd give my left arm to be able to take.*
* This post brought to you by satire and Amendment 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
Whatever happened to the official PAINTINGS of the President? Did that method go the way of the dodo? I know this method is cheaper, but it just doesn't have the same historical feel as a painting...
@Cup of Pork Noodles? Give Me Shrimp!: Agreed, a digital photo can't stand up to the classically painted portrait. Each and every other President had the painted portrait taken; it gives a sense of collectivism with every other President and the office.
Also, a painter can take out any individual flaws with the person they're painting. Obama's messy hair wouldn't be noticed (and judged 100 years down the line), and the background would look perfectly clear.
I'm sure someone else already noticed this...a flash was fired (two flashes, to be exact) for this portrait. One was an umbrella to Mr. Obama's right, the other a smaller, less intense light source used for fill on his left side. The flashes were fired either by a PC cord or a hotshoe mounted trigger (pocketwizard), either of which would not be noted in the EXIF data. Just common Strobist equipment here. Kudos to Canon for being there.
Honestly, I'd expect that the flag was blurred in photoshop after the fact and may not have been part of the photo initially (added in photoshop). To get that amount of bokeh with a 105mm lens at f.10 would require a pretty good distance between the lens and the flag. Looks more like gaussian blur to me. Either way it's a great photo.
05/14/09
1. It took a long time to kill the betamax.
2. Sony invented the 3.5. Thats cool.
05/08/09
And there are many other interesting models like the TR (first glossy screen/AR coating), TX (first led display in a notebook and first 16:9 in a notebook) and SZ (first with switchable graphics).
05/08/09
05/08/09
Maybe that's because they had help with Blu-Ray.
05/08/09
01/14/09
* This post brought to you by satire and Amendment 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
01/14/09
01/14/09
Also, a painter can take out any individual flaws with the person they're painting. Obama's messy hair wouldn't be noticed (and judged 100 years down the line), and the background would look perfectly clear.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
Honestly, I'd expect that the flag was blurred in photoshop after the fact and may not have been part of the photo initially (added in photoshop). To get that amount of bokeh with a 105mm lens at f.10 would require a pretty good distance between the lens and the flag. Looks more like gaussian blur to me. Either way it's a great photo.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
Nice shot though.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
Especially with the settings listed...
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09