<![CDATA[Gizmodo: gene munster]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: gene munster]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/genemunster http://gizmodo.com/tag/genemunster <![CDATA[Remainders - Things We Didn't Post]]> An Owl in a Box...Google Finally Solves PDF Searching...Lo and Behold: Teens Prefer the Apple...Rock Band Coming to iPhone?


We could try to justify this post in many ways, but it would be a stretch. We can't even call BS and claim it's Photoshop. The fact is, it's just an owl in a box. And I can't look away. [Reynen's Journal via Jalopnik, BoingBoing]


PDFs are the one major roadblock to a nice intense Google search—you see that little indicator and you have to either download, get the shitty HTML view, or just walk away. So Google is fixing it. Now, when you see the Quick View tag, you get a nicely formatted PDF. Go ahead, try it. You'll like it. [Technologizer]


Someone from the Department of No Shit (actually, it was Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster, so pretty close) said that in a current study, most kids like the Apple products. It's really not surprising that most of the time, 100% of kids shopping for MP3 players want iPods, though in the fall, it seems to dip a tad, when Microsoft releases its latest Zune, and about 15% dare to be different. Also not surprising: Among the minority of kids who actually buy music, almost all of those dorks use iTunes. And to top it off, there's currently a spike in iPhone sales among teens, presumably boosted by the $99 3G option. In the next six months, nearly a quarter of teens claim they will buy an iPhone. This study is helpful for Apple bean counters, but it really says nothing at all about taste or judgment, if you think about it. [AllThingsD]


Speaking of those damn kids, they just can't get enough of this "Rock Band" either. Next thing you know, they'll be wanting it on their Apple products. Well, they just might get it, according to this shot from the otherwise mostly boring CTIA phone conference. And it just might have multiplayer mode with Bluetooth. Oh kids. I'll be in the bar. [MobileCrunch]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5376763&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Analyst Says Apple Tablet in First Half of 2010]]> Gene Munster, an Apple analyst, says that Apple's likely to release a 7 to 10-inch touchscreen tablet some time in the early half of 2010. Usually analysts' predictions are sketchy, but Munster's is slightly less so.

Munster says he spoke to "component contacts" in Asia, analyzed patents, looked at comments from Tim Cook (and probably read our Apple Tablet roundup), which caused him to make the prediction that the device won't be ready yet in 2009.

He did say that the tablet should be more complex than an iPod/iPhone, and will be some kind of hybrid between that OS and the standard OS X on desktops and laptops. But of course, he's still an analyst, so none of this is guaranteed to be true. [Business Insider via Wired]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5264517&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Place Yer Bets: Will WWDC Have a New iPhone?]]> Feeds are burning up with chatter about whether or not the next iPhone will flash a grin at the Jobs-less Schiller-heavy WWDC keynote. What's your totally uneducated—or surprisingly prescient—guess?

The best post on the subject is from John Paslkdjclkjdcski (just kidding, dude—P-A-C-Z-K-O-W-S-K-I) at AllThingsD, who quotes Apple-whore analyst Gene Munster who says it's an absolute "nope," then updates the story with a quote from another equally non-Apple-employed person saying it's likely.

The reasons are both valid: No, because Apple will wait for the return of Jobs to unveil sweet goodies; and yes, because if new iPhone has new programming requirements, they'll want to spring them on developers at a developers conference. Pacz himself seems to lean towards "yes," since WWDC is Apple's biggest scheduled attraction of the year. I'm leaning toward "hrmmaybeletsjustseecantsayforsurewhateveryeahsoundsgood." What's your call? [AllThingsD]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5253070&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Three Million iPhones 3G Sold in One Month, Says Analyst Who Is Not Gene Munster]]> Scott Moritz at Fortune is reporting that Apple has sold 3 million iPhones 3G in one month, according to an analyst who is not Gene Munster. This tea leave reader is former T-Mobile executive Michael Cote, who says that demand keeps going up thanks to the iPhone 3G's price point, consumer enthusiasm, and international sales:

They are seeing unprecedented demand. The demand is so strong it may impact or delay the new countries coming on.

It doesn't surprise us, specially after Apple itself declared one million iPhones 3G sold in one weekend. Still, I'm sure Munster will see Cote's three millions and raise a gajillion more. [Fortune, thanks Matthew]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035467&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Munster Says 3 Percent of Teens Own iPhones, 9 Percent of Friends Totally Jealous]]> Phil Elmer-Dewitt, voice of the newly relocated Fortune Apple 2.0 blog, published Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster's latest report, a survey of 980 teens that reveals:
• 3% of students surveyed own iPhones
• An additional 9% expect to buy an iPhone in the next 6 months
• 4.2% of surveyed adults also had iPhones
• iPod market share is holding steady at 82%, with Sony and SanDisk tied for second place (4% each)
But PED thought Mr. Munster's numbers were a tad fishy, that rather than accurately reflecting the US, it was a snapshot of a tech-savvier subset.

There are roughly 28 million teenagers in the U.S., and it seems unlikely that they account for 840,000 of the 1.1 million iPhones sold so far.
And this doesn't even begin to factor in the 4.2% of adults Munster claims have the Jesus phone.

The other ambiguity is this 82% iPod market share. Does it include iPhones? Or can this mean that, in spite of brisk iPhone sales, iPod sales have remained consistent? Here's the chart—as you can see, the iPhone could be under iPod or Other:
10-10-07_Piper_Jaffray_Survey.jpg[Apple 2.0]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309081&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[iPhone Price Cut Has Driven 200-Percent Sales Hike]]> According to Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster, before Sept. 5, iPhone sales had leveled off at around 9,000 per day, mostly at $600 a pop. Now, following the iPhone price cut, Apple is moving 27,000 per day at $400 each. But is this growth sustainable? No. Munster says he thinks that after this initial 200% sales surge, the price-cut will yield a stable 50% sales increase. Apple has verified none of this. [Apple 2.0]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298558&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gene Munster Predicts $205 For Apple in 2008]]> Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster has moved Apple's stock price projection for 2009 up a whole year to 2008, making Munster's projection the highest price anyone has ever given Apple: $205 per share. Is there method to his madness? Of course. And it has something to do with our obnoxious graphic.

One thing we learned with the iPod is that when a device is game-changing, the demand will come...However, it is difficult to predict the inflection point. For example, in December 2004, Street expectations for iPod ran wild with investors anticipating 8 million iPods, but Apple only sold 4.6 million. It was feared at the time that the iPod would never go mainstream.

Conversations with investors over the past month suggest awareness of potential for iPhone units is high, but awareness of potential resulting impact to earnings is low...if Apple can sell 45 million units in CY09, the earnings power and historical multiple ranges suggest our price target is reasonable.

So as long as Munster gets the rest of Wall Street on board, he's ready to party. 45 million units sound good to everyone else? [appleinsider]]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281090&view=rss&microfeed=true