Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
The second I clicked on gizmodo and noticed that decked-out AT&T advertisement orange home page I thought to myself, "better scroll down to find a recent post that shits on AT&T." Well well, lookie here. Irony is like fine wine, it hides away in your cellar, and continues to grow finer with age.
@Zoolook: no, but AT&T does use kittens as target practice.
This is the same as politics, it's not which one is the best, it's which one sucks less.
Verizon sucks less.
The reason they've spent less on every quarter since the iPhone's launch is that since the end of 2007 credit's been constricting and businesses have been uncertain about their future economic outlooks. Companies like AT&T utilize short term credit and long term debt to expand.
Cash and Cash equivalents may increase, but thats because companies have to protect their liquidity in recessions like this. Companies that don't have idle liquidity can get crushed in a matter of days. If AT&T ended up locked out of commercial paper markets, they could burn through that 4.375 billion in a matter of days.
Also, increasing cash and cash equivalents could easily be a sign that AT&T is either preparing to: buy another provider, or build more capacity into the network. They may just be waiting for more clear signs that consumer spending is recovering.
2008 and 2009 were not good years to be shoveling cash out the door for long term investments.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: All true enough, but when you are going on the tele blathering on about how you are spending all of this money improving your network, you better damn well be doing it. The problem is not that AT&T is hoarding cash due to the financial situation - most businesses are. The problem is they are borderline lying about their efforts to fix their broken network.
@Monty: Its all relative really. Yes, they have spent less every quarter, but they've probably still shelled out more money than they would have liked to. To them thats equivalent to trying to improve their network.
They could also be in the planning stages of a big expansion, and letting cash build up to be able to lay down some hefty amounts at the initiation of a plan to expand, in order to attract creditors who will want them to put out what amounts to down payments on collateral for large loans.
Business investment takes time to plan. If they did it haphazardly that would be even more disasterous than not doing it at all.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: You raise good points, but I have a few counter-points.
- as a telecom provider whose customers are locked into long-term contracts, the company has a very stable, predictable cash flow stream. There is very little uncertainty. As a result, it is less dependent on commercial paper markets than companies such as GE, which fundamentally rely on short-term credit markets to fund manufacturing, inventory, etc
- As a wireless provider, at&t wireless is in a high growth industry. I can say with pretty good certainty that their business will not be crushed by the declining economy. The numbers have shown this. And in any event, it is backstopped by customer contracts.
- The short-term debt markets have been buoyed by the TALF program run by the government. The US government will not allow these markets to shut down.
-Long term credit is more a problem for sure, but the company is printing money. They may not be able to lever up the ass, but i am sure they can find or roll over some of their debt when it comes due.
@MrBlahBlah: 2 years of guaranteed revenues can still leave AT&T up a creek with no paddle, if customers cancel and refuse to pay the ETF they have no collateral to collect on. There was much uncertainty as to how consumers would react to constricting credit for consumers. No one knew if they would simply cancel everything and take the hit to their credit, taking cheaper paygo options that are available. After realizing the bonanza of consumer spending had ended, companies were extremely wary about how erratic customers would become.
AT&T is in a high growth industry you are right about that. but 2008- and 2009 were years where there was no certainty as to what would happen economically in the future. Even high growth industries will start to suffer if unemployment creeps high enough. Especially since demand for higher end higher margin plans is probably quite elastic. If AT&T extended its cash on the basis of those assumptions and thing had taken a turn for the worse ... kersplat! It appears that won't happen but the fear that it would from mid 2008 to mid 2009 was extreme.
AT&T still relies on short term debt markets when making initial outlays on construction. At the time AT&T stopped spending, the government had not created TALF. They stopped spending at the end of 2007 and in mid 2008 no one knew if we were headed for The Great Depression - the Remix, or a mild recession.
I'd agree with you about the fact that AT&T is in high growth industry. But if you look at stock prices during the worst of 2008 and 2009 it becomes clear that no one was certain about the future value of the industry.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: I'm jumping in a little late here, but wanted to clear up a few points. AT&T has securitized credit card and licensing receivables, but never (to my knowledge, though I'd be interested in hearing if I'm wrong) consumer contract receivables. Why would they? As others have indicated, they're sitting on so much cash that they have no need to go through the administrative expense (and lose the necessary margin) of selling off their future consumer cash flows for the sake of an immediate cash infusion. And there's virtually no risk - you won't even find a discussion of reserves for contract cancellations in their reports - so no need to find a hedge fund to take on that risk. In other words, their CapEx has very little to do with the credit markets.
Sure they need to worry about a downturn in consumer spending along with everyone else: people may decide that it doesn't make sense to spend $100 a month on a cell phone plan when they can't pay rent. But you know how to make absolutely dead sure that people won't pay them $100 a month? By having a shitty network that makes people hate their phone and AT&T, count down the days until they can trade it in for a Droid, and vow never to use AT&T again. They needed to balance a need for medium-term cash with a desire for long-term customer loyalty, and in my estimation they've done a complete f*ckup of a job.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: Businesses like banks have been in trouble because one of their revenue streams (monthly loan payments) have taken a huge hit due to the recession. It used to be that the first payment any household made was the mortgage. Now, though, one of the first payments that people make every month is their phone bill. This is because of the relative ease of shutting off a phone (simple software disconnect) versus the relative difficulty of foreclosing on a home (a year or more from start to finish). As a result, banks are faltering and companies like AT&T are thriving, because they're the first 'creditor' getting paid. So the argument that AT&T needs to protect its liquidity is pretty absurd.
@torabone: AT&T needs to protect its liquidity because it still shells out money every day to run the company. Many of their costs are fixed costs and it would take time to stop incurring them if they lose customers. Losing paying customers doesn't mean AT&T can scale down costs just as fast.
AT&T is thriving because things didn't go as badly as everyone feared they would. But its pretty easy to see why AT&T has taken the tack they did, considering the high amount of uncertainty.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: True true. In a time of crisis and uncertainty, management will definitely err towards the more conservative and protect their cash. For an executive, a recession is not a time to take risks; on the contrary, they must be defensive to protect their business.
In a way at&t is a case study of the way most companies have acted in the recession. Don't spend, stay conservative. It's actually part of what has made the recession worse.
From a management perspective, I don't think I would have done too much differently. But from a consumer's perspective, they suck. I understand their reasoning for not investing as much during a massive recession, but they are still really really expensive. The text message thing pisses me off so much. At that point, it just becomes gouging.
Sometimes I wish the pursuit of profit didn't come at the expense of the consumer.
Come on, guys - lay off poor AT&T. It costs a lot of money to create advertising campaigns to convince consumers that they are a good company.
Seriously .. Was there one of us in geek land that screamed with little girl joy when the iPhone was announced on their network? Are any of us surprised by how all of this has turned out? This is AT&T, folks -- this is what they do. They are good at it.
The AT&T data plan is for unlimited usage. That is incentive for us users to use data without regard to any limitation.
The only "incentive" AT&T can "offer" is either discontinuance of unlimited data for new contracts or termination of it across the board.
The former will lead competitors to tout unlimited data as a selling point and the latter will enable everyone with unlimited data an opportunity to jump ship without an ETF.
In the industry, I believe this is called "up shit creek".
In the interest of fairness....less money doesn't necessarily indicate less improvements. It's possible that the cost of improvements have gotten cheaper, and thus they're able to spend their money more effici-....
AT&T may or may not deserve the abuse being heaped upon them for their network performance but this "story" strikes me as unnecessarily inflammatory.
At some point in a network buildout, capex begins to taper off. Like most capital assets, ongoing maintenance and enhancement costs are lower than construction costs.
It just so happens that the iPhone launched as AT&T's 3G investment was peaking.
12/18/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
Though, I'm glad I'm with Verizon, because AT&T is as greedy as Goldman Sachs.
12/17/09
12/17/09
This is the same as politics, it's not which one is the best, it's which one sucks less.
Verizon sucks less.
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
Didn't notice that until you said that. LOLOLllolLolololl!!!!111!!1!
How dumb is AT&T? VERY VERY DUMB THAT'S HOW DUMB. lol
12/17/09
Cash and Cash equivalents may increase, but thats because companies have to protect their liquidity in recessions like this. Companies that don't have idle liquidity can get crushed in a matter of days. If AT&T ended up locked out of commercial paper markets, they could burn through that 4.375 billion in a matter of days.
Also, increasing cash and cash equivalents could easily be a sign that AT&T is either preparing to: buy another provider, or build more capacity into the network. They may just be waiting for more clear signs that consumer spending is recovering.
2008 and 2009 were not good years to be shoveling cash out the door for long term investments.
12/17/09
12/17/09
They could also be in the planning stages of a big expansion, and letting cash build up to be able to lay down some hefty amounts at the initiation of a plan to expand, in order to attract creditors who will want them to put out what amounts to down payments on collateral for large loans.
Business investment takes time to plan. If they did it haphazardly that would be even more disasterous than not doing it at all.
12/17/09
- as a telecom provider whose customers are locked into long-term contracts, the company has a very stable, predictable cash flow stream. There is very little uncertainty. As a result, it is less dependent on commercial paper markets than companies such as GE, which fundamentally rely on short-term credit markets to fund manufacturing, inventory, etc
- As a wireless provider, at&t wireless is in a high growth industry. I can say with pretty good certainty that their business will not be crushed by the declining economy. The numbers have shown this. And in any event, it is backstopped by customer contracts.
- The short-term debt markets have been buoyed by the TALF program run by the government. The US government will not allow these markets to shut down.
-Long term credit is more a problem for sure, but the company is printing money. They may not be able to lever up the ass, but i am sure they can find or roll over some of their debt when it comes due.
12/17/09
AT&T is in a high growth industry you are right about that. but 2008- and 2009 were years where there was no certainty as to what would happen economically in the future. Even high growth industries will start to suffer if unemployment creeps high enough. Especially since demand for higher end higher margin plans is probably quite elastic. If AT&T extended its cash on the basis of those assumptions and thing had taken a turn for the worse ... kersplat! It appears that won't happen but the fear that it would from mid 2008 to mid 2009 was extreme.
AT&T still relies on short term debt markets when making initial outlays on construction. At the time AT&T stopped spending, the government had not created TALF. They stopped spending at the end of 2007 and in mid 2008 no one knew if we were headed for The Great Depression - the Remix, or a mild recession.
I'd agree with you about the fact that AT&T is in high growth industry. But if you look at stock prices during the worst of 2008 and 2009 it becomes clear that no one was certain about the future value of the industry.
12/17/09
12/17/09
Sure they need to worry about a downturn in consumer spending along with everyone else: people may decide that it doesn't make sense to spend $100 a month on a cell phone plan when they can't pay rent. But you know how to make absolutely dead sure that people won't pay them $100 a month? By having a shitty network that makes people hate their phone and AT&T, count down the days until they can trade it in for a Droid, and vow never to use AT&T again. They needed to balance a need for medium-term cash with a desire for long-term customer loyalty, and in my estimation they've done a complete f*ckup of a job.
12/17/09
12/17/09
AT&T is thriving because things didn't go as badly as everyone feared they would. But its pretty easy to see why AT&T has taken the tack they did, considering the high amount of uncertainty.
12/17/09
In a way at&t is a case study of the way most companies have acted in the recession. Don't spend, stay conservative. It's actually part of what has made the recession worse.
From a management perspective, I don't think I would have done too much differently. But from a consumer's perspective, they suck. I understand their reasoning for not investing as much during a massive recession, but they are still really really expensive. The text message thing pisses me off so much. At that point, it just becomes gouging.
Sometimes I wish the pursuit of profit didn't come at the expense of the consumer.
12/18/09
12/17/09
Seriously .. Was there one of us in geek land that screamed with little girl joy when the iPhone was announced on their network? Are any of us surprised by how all of this has turned out? This is AT&T, folks -- this is what they do. They are good at it.
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
The only "incentive" AT&T can "offer" is either discontinuance of unlimited data for new contracts or termination of it across the board.
The former will lead competitors to tout unlimited data as a selling point and the latter will enable everyone with unlimited data an opportunity to jump ship without an ETF.
In the industry, I believe this is called "up shit creek".
12/17/09
And there's no paddle app for that on your iphone either..
12/17/09
Awww, who am I kidding.
#attsucks
12/17/09
At some point in a network buildout, capex begins to taper off. Like most capital assets, ongoing maintenance and enhancement costs are lower than construction costs.
It just so happens that the iPhone launched as AT&T's 3G investment was peaking.
12/17/09
12/10/09
12/10/09
12/14/09