Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
so, dead authors. does that mean i can finally get my dr. seuss library switched to digital? actually, scratch that. i don't wanna lose the illustrations.
@Nick: mission accomplished: A certain amount of time has to pass before literary works become public domain. I forgot the details, but I think it's 85 years or so.
If you look at Google's success rate outside their foundation of search and advertising, they have really only done well with email. Other projects of Google have a very mixed record of success. So Google entering the ebook world is really not that big a deal.. at least not just yet.
Google's current strategy on ebooks seems to be centered on research related books, which makes a lot of sense given that's what folks would want to read on their PC more than a portable device. But their approach, which essentially boils down to them buying the digital rights to stuff that the sellers don't have the rights to sell, is monopolistic and evil. I wouldn't be surprised if they do the same with their move into consumer ebooks.
@weatherman: "they have really only done well with email"
Maps? Android? Chrome? Reader?
Google may have a "see what sticks" attitude toward new programs, but saying they're only successful in search and email is like saying Microsoft's only success is operating systems.
I own both, Kindle and Sony Reader. The attractiveness of the Sony Reader is that it allows use of an SD slot and can read most file formats, pdf, docs, rtf, etc. For Kindle you're locked in, and have to pay for each file you want converted and send it to Amazon, but the Sprint-connected Kindle Store is very useful. You don't have to sync and its very user-friendly.
If you have lots of your own documents you want to read and want an open-system then the Sony Reader is the better option, if you want to purchase books and have newspapers wirelessly delivered then Kindle is the better option.
@Scaramanga: which Sony and which Kindle do you have? I've heard that the Sony PRS-505 screen is actually slightly better than the Kindle 2 screen in terms of contrast for some reason. Can you speak to that?
Somehow I can't help but equate the "I like books better and e-readers" attitude to the old "I'll never get my news from the internet, I like my newspaper" attitude.
5 years later, newspapers are dropping like flies.
We are at an interesting crossroad in literature. Guttenberg (the guy) essentially a market by creating a way to share information in a physical medium and thereby monetizing it. Prior to that, there were bards, newscriers, etc. that spread information by word of mouth but there was no consistency of the message.
So if we remove that physical media and continue to spurn DRM, what happens to the market?
Who will be the journalist, author, investigative reporter if there is no way to make sure you are paid for your services?
@EVEs_Mako: the Sony Reader doesn't stink - it's actually a very good device. It's not as integrated into the ebook store as the Kindle is, and it doesn't have wireless, but it has a great design and a very nice screen.
You can pick up a new PRS-505 for about $100 less than the Kindle, and it even comes with a free cover (so it's actually closer to $130 less). I think you'll be impressed. If, that is, you get most of your books from sources other than the Sony Store.
"but for whom contemporary fiction and fancy "Whispernet" technologies, "nice screens" and "magazine subscriptions" are just a little too modern."
The Sony Reader 505 which came out even before Kindle 1, has a comparable if not better screen than Kindle 1/2.
For the other stuff, yes, I would like to have something like Whispernet on the Sony except it does impact battery life quite a bit. And magazine subscriptions? Modern fiction? Meh.
I had a hard time choosing between the two at first, but went with Sony for the value... mag subs don't do much, and while I am jealous of the whispernet, at the snail's pace I read, loading up 20 books will keep me busy for a LONG time. Plus, I don't know many times in my life where I am not near a PC. (but I do so fear those times)
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
06/01/09
Google's current strategy on ebooks seems to be centered on research related books, which makes a lot of sense given that's what folks would want to read on their PC more than a portable device. But their approach, which essentially boils down to them buying the digital rights to stuff that the sellers don't have the rights to sell, is monopolistic and evil. I wouldn't be surprised if they do the same with their move into consumer ebooks.
06/01/09
Maps? Android? Chrome? Reader?
Google may have a "see what sticks" attitude toward new programs, but saying they're only successful in search and email is like saying Microsoft's only success is operating systems.
06/01/09
06/01/09
03/19/09
If you have lots of your own documents you want to read and want an open-system then the Sony Reader is the better option, if you want to purchase books and have newspapers wirelessly delivered then Kindle is the better option.
03/19/09
03/19/09
5 years later, newspapers are dropping like flies.
We are at an interesting crossroad in literature. Guttenberg (the guy) essentially a market by creating a way to share information in a physical medium and thereby monetizing it. Prior to that, there were bards, newscriers, etc. that spread information by word of mouth but there was no consistency of the message.
So if we remove that physical media and continue to spurn DRM, what happens to the market?
Who will be the journalist, author, investigative reporter if there is no way to make sure you are paid for your services?
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
03/19/09
You can pick up a new PRS-505 for about $100 less than the Kindle, and it even comes with a free cover (so it's actually closer to $130 less). I think you'll be impressed. If, that is, you get most of your books from sources other than the Sony Store.
03/19/09
The Sony Reader 505 which came out even before Kindle 1, has a comparable if not better screen than Kindle 1/2.
For the other stuff, yes, I would like to have something like Whispernet on the Sony except it does impact battery life quite a bit. And magazine subscriptions? Modern fiction? Meh.
03/19/09
I had a hard time choosing between the two at first, but went with Sony for the value... mag subs don't do much, and while I am jealous of the whispernet, at the snail's pace I read, loading up 20 books will keep me busy for a LONG time. Plus, I don't know many times in my life where I am not near a PC. (but I do so fear those times)
03/19/09
its all about video in the 21st century
iphone and itouch ftw
03/19/09
If not, then I pity the fool.
03/19/09
"I don't care, I don't reads books,
its all about video in the 21st century
iphone and itouch ftw"