<![CDATA[Gizmodo: Government]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: Government]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/government http://gizmodo.com/tag/government <![CDATA[ Robots Act Out Guantanamo Waterboarding Torture, Terrorists Win ]]> There's a new exhibit at Coney Island that's fun for the whole family: the "Waterboard Thrill Ride." Greeted by Spongebob exuding “It don’t Gitmo better!" you walk in to peer through bars at dude in dark sweats leaning over another guy in an orange suit, his face wrapped in a towel. Slip a dollar into the machine, and for 15 seconds, "Dark Hood" pours water into Orange Jumpsuit's nose and mouth while he convulses.

I think there might be some sort of political and cultural commentary going on—something about the US and torture and calling it a thrill ride and people paying to see it at a carnival. Anyways! The artist who created the animatronic exhibit, Steve Powers, actually wanted to do a waterboarding exhibit with real people—he'd be waterboarded first, then perform it on a volunteer, who would do it to the next guy and so on. But pseudo-drowning robots is obviously safer, and maybe a touch less controversial—after all, do androids dream of electric freedom? [NYT via BoingBoing]

]]>
Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:15:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034224&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TSA Confiscates Homemade Battery and Water Bottle, Declares Victory Over Terror ]]> "For six long minutes on June 30, screening operations froze at Jackson-Evers International Airport's West checkpoint in Mississippi." Bated breath. "Transportation Security Officer Scot Peele leveraged his training and experience when he detected the suspicious item while monitoring the X-ray image of the passenger's carry-on bag." The "explosive-like" item that brought you this tense Jack Bauer moment? An empty water bottle and an engineer's homemade battery pack to keep his portable DVD alive on a long flight to Hawaii.

Even though, as Phil Torrone points out, a seasoned bomb expert could deduce in two seconds the battery pack—which is pretty much like a commercial one, except it's hand-crafted with 28 rechargeables connected by resistors and held together by a silicon-based adhesive—was not a bomb and totally safe, the engineer ultimately gave it up anyway to pass through "after recognizing that the item could be seen by other passengers as a threat." That photo that makes it seem vaguely ghetto bomberrific is probably staged too. (Why is the wire positioned to look like it's connected to the water bottle?)

Uplifting moral of the story: If something even looks vaguely bomblike to the wandering, untrained eye of the sweaty guy munching Ambien in the seat next to you, the TSA will bust it, regardless of its actual potential to cause harm (it is causing terror, after all). BTW, Phil says he hasn't had any problems flying with homemade electronics, but make sure anything you carry that has wires and batteries couldn't be mistaken as bomblike by the lowest common denominator of airline passengers. [TSA via Schneir on Security via MAKE]

]]>
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:50:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031144&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FCC Asked to Get Carriers to Hurry Up Local Number Portability Already ]]> With all the advances in technology we've had over the last couple of decades, you'd think that something as simple as changing your land line number into a cellular one would take hours at most. At least Congress does, and its now urging the FCC to put rules in place that will speed up local number portability processing.

Congress says the rules, which would give a 48-hour time limit for carriers to transfer numbers between each other, are necessary since carriers have been known to delay processing in a bid to throw as many retention offers as they can at customers trying to switch. The FCC seems to agree that it's a good idea, but was ambivalent as always about when it'd get around to implementing new regulations. [DSLreports]

]]>
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:30:00 EDT Elaine Chow http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026993&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Senators Propose Bill Banning Higher Cellphone Taxes; We Like This Bill ]]> unclesammovie.jpgJust in case you haven't noticed the outrageous charges on your bill every month, Uncle Sam just loves taxing cellphones and wireless charges. While the average tax rate for most products is 7.07%, on wireless services it's a whopping 15.9% when you combine the local, state and federal taxes. Not cool. Well, some senators are trying to get reelected fighting for the little guy, proposing a five-year ban on more cellphone taxation.

The bill, dubbed the Mobile Wireless Tax Fairness Act of 2008, is a aisle-crossing affair, as it's co-sponsered by Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME). If the bill is passed, the taxes won't be lowered, they'l just be frozen in place for at least five years. Hey, I'll take it. These data plans are ridiculous enough without taxes making it even more expensive. Let's make this happen, Congress! [Ars Technica]

]]>
Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:00:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024459&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federal Government Halts Solar Power Projects for Two Years ]]> In order to survey the impact of massive solar power plants on the environment and wildlife, the federal government is freezing new solar projects on public land for about two years. The alternative energy industry is reacting as if the world's tofu supply has been exhausted, since this effectively nukes new solar power development for the time being (because buying private land is way more expensive for startups than leasing public land).

Caught in the crossroads are environmentalists who both love the desert tortoise and solar power. The industry says that the government could do impact studies without halting new proposals for solar projects—we think they're telling the truth, since they're probably less evil than oil companies and actually do want the Mojave ground squirrel to thrive and live happy furry lives. And I mean, two years, really? [NYT via Fark]

]]>
Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:30:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020404&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Russian State TV Digitally (and Messily) Erases Government Critics from the Airwaves ]]> Take a look at the above picture. Notice anything strange? Those legs and that hand next to the guy with the microphone belong to a critic of Vladamir Putin named Mikhail G. Delyagin. The rest of him? It's been digitally erased from the entire broadcast, a result of his being placed on a "stop list" of critics of the Russian government and Prime Minister Putin.

Using digital manipulation to literally erase any critic of the administration is a pretty great way to stifle any kind of dissent, and it's pretty easy when you're in control of the national networks. It's also scary, reminiscent of the "memory holes" from 1984 and a startling sign of an oppressive government.

It's not just politicians and talk shows that are affected, either.

Televizor, a rock group whose name means TV set, had its booking on a St. Petersburg station canceled in April, after its members took part in an Other Russia demonstration.

When some actors cracked a few mild jokes about Mr. Putin and Mr. Medvedev at Russia’s equivalent of the Academy Awards in March, they were expunged from the telecast.

Indeed, political humor in general has been exiled from TV. One of the nation’s most popular satirists, Viktor A. Shenderovich, once had a show that featured puppet caricatures of Russian leaders, including Mr. Putin. It was canceled in Mr. Putin’s first term, and Mr. Shenderovich has been all but barred from TV.

It's a pretty scary reminder that while we usually see technology as fun and convenient, a neat diversion from our daily lives, new digital video editing tech allows for some pretty horrible things to take place. [NY Times]

]]>
Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:40:00 EDT Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5012666&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How to Cover Your Text Message Tracks ]]> It's Friday, so the mass of stupid and regrettable (and maybe criminal) text messages you wished you never sent is about explode exponentially, as it does every weekend. Google, as you know, keeps your embarrassing search history for "AZN Squirrels Pooping on Bananas" or "Iron Man upskirt" for 18 months. But how long do Verizon and AT&T hang on to your shameful SMSes? Thankfully, not long at all. Sprint hangs on to your textual diarrhea the longest, for about two weeks, while AT&T dumps them after 48 hours, according to Slate's Explainer. We hit up Verizon, who said a "couple days, tops." There are a couple catches, though.

While with the major carriers, for the most part, no one (not even the cops) can dredge up stuff from years ago since it's been long deleted, watch out if you're on an employer's carrier, like Skytel, which touts its messaging archival features. The other major catch is that even deleted messages can be recovered directly from your phone, just like deleted data from any other storage device, because of the way deletion works—it just marks the data as okay to be overwritten, so if it hasn't been replaced by new data, it's still recoverable. It's a bit easier to snag from SIM cards (which can hold up to 30 messages) than from the phone's internal memory 'cause there are dedicated gadgets for doing so.

Bottom line though, text messages are still probably the safest way to go about your business (dirty or otherwise) without worrying about getting snooped (much safer than IM or email, which are notoriously logged)—as long as you wipe them off your actual phone and make it past the two-day mark carrier-side. An anonymous prepaid phone works even better, obviously. [Slate]

]]>
Fri, 02 May 2008 19:30:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386760&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Border Agents Can Frisk Your Laptop and Gadgets Without Cause ]]> If you don't want border agents to see nekkid pictures of your significant other, you might wanna leave your laptop at home when you travel abroad. The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled earlier this week that computers are like any other dumb luggage, so they're subject to search even without reasonable suspicion that you're a turrist or doing anything illegal.

The District Court for California had previously said laptop searches were an "intrusion of the mind" but the feds appealed to the Ninth Court, arguing that laptops are like any other container, and they need to search them to prevent crime and turrism.

The law already allows border agents to rifle through diaries and other "personal material" without cause, so this isn't a huge change in one sense, but the Association of Corporate Travel Executives is now advising corporate drones to avoid carrying proprietary information with them across US borders. Wow, I never thought I'd be on the same side of an argument as a bunch of suits. [InfoWeek, Thanks Carlos]

]]>
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:00:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=383649&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ No More Tax Free Online Purchases For New York With New "Amazon Tax" Bill ]]> In case living in New York wasn't already expensive enough, state lawmakers passed the "Amazon Tax" bill this week, which will require online retailers to collect sales taxes on purchases shipped to the state, even when they don't have physical operations there.

New York-based retailers have argued for years that the Amazon loophole gives out-of-state online shopping centers an unfair advantage. Technically, consumers are supposed to report purchases they make online on their tax returns, but virtually nobody does it and enforcement is impossible.

The bill still needs a signature from Governor David Paterson to officially become law, but he's widely expected to OK it. The state government expects the new requirement to generate about $50 million in revenue this fiscal year.

Meanwhile, as a resident of this fair city who uses Amazon like her life depends on it, I get to watch my wallet empty 8.375 percent faster - in the middle of a recession! Thanks, government! [Internet News]

]]>
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:00:00 EDT Elaine Chow http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379090&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Federal Employees Spend Your Tax Dollars on Johnnie Walker Gold, Gambling and... iPods ]]> bushpod.jpgShocker: The government blows the money it rips from our paychecks! But now we know where some of that money is going—to buy "iPods, lingerie and socializing" (read: Grey Goose vodka martinis), as well as gambling and internet dating services. The Government Accountability Office (ha) found that half of all transactions by federal employees with government-issued SmartPay cards were for those necessities. Oh, if only Eliot Spitzer had stuck to questionable iPod purchases with government funds. [Washington Post via Listening Post]

]]>
Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:10:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377927&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ DARPA Wants Contact Lenses to Turn Real-Life Combat Into Call of Duty 4 ]]> contact.jpg The problem with cool strap-on heads-up displays a few lucky soldiers get to use on the battlefield today is that they're bulky affairs that make them look like half-assed cyborgs. Plus, the interface is limited. The Pentagon wants to develop contact lenses that'll put "first-person-shooter-type video game" graphics on top the soldiers' vision. Yes, they want to make real-life combat the realest Halo match ever.

Specifically, they're looking for "information on technology areas for the creation of micro- and nano-scale display technologies for the purpose of creating displays that could be worn as transparent contact lenses." And they want it now. Okay, like three to five years, but that's practically immediate for the Pentagon. Right in time for Halo 5. [Federal Business Opportunities via Danger Room]

]]>
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:45:46 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370414&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ House Denies Warrantless Wiretapping Immunity For Telcos ]]> In a textbook display of checks and balances, the House of Representatives defied President Bush and the Senate yesterday by passing their version of a surveillance bill without legal immunity for telcos. The bill passed by only 16 votes, far from the 2/3 majority needed to override Bush's inevitable veto. It looks like this legislative battle could continue until the next president takes office in 2009. As we have seen, an Obama administration would deny immunity, McCain would grant immunity, and Clinton? Who knows. [dslreports]

]]>
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:55:46 EDT Eric Sheline http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368314&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Whistleblower Says the Feds Are Spying on Your (Verizon) Mobile Phone Too ]]> Not sweating the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program 'cause you don't have a landline, just a mobile? Tell your glands to kick in again. A computer security consultant working for a wireless carrier—probably Verizon—stumbled upon a high-speed backdoor built into the carrier's network for the Feds to pull anything from "the billing system, text messaging, fraud detection, web site, and pretty much all the systems in the data center without apparent restrictions."

Threat Level pegs the wireless carrier as Verizon Wireless, because of a 2006 lawsuit whose allegations are extremely similar—a direct line built into their network for a "Quantico recipient" (Quantico, Virginia being the FBI's cyber-surveillance HQ) which allowed:

"Direct access to all content and all information concerning the origin and termination of telephone calls placed on the Verizon Wireless network as well as the actual content of calls."
Plus!
"Unfettered access to Verizon Wireless customer records, data and information. Any customer databases, records and information could be downloaded from this center."
Naturally, Verizon's mouthpiece Peter Thonis couldn't confirm or deny anything about a Quantico setup or if Pasdar worked for Verizon.

Takeaway, if you're dense: Everything is tapped, there's nothing you can do about it. Whatever thrust there was in righteous outrage is spent and pointless—but at least you know when you're talking to yourself (on a phone?), there's probably someone listening. =) [Threat Level]

]]>
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:00:36 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364435&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NSA Gets the Best AT&T Coverage Around ]]> Yes, this is real, and spectacular. The Billboard Liberation Front has launched an "improvement" campaign on AT&T billboards in the SF area "to promote and celebrate the innovative collaboration of these two global communications giants" with their massive warrantless domestic spying program (explained by a cute bear). We're waiting for some "Yes, the NSA can hear you now" Verizon billboards to match. Update: Video of them putting it up after the jump.

The Billboard Liberation Front today announced a major new advertising improvement campaign executed on behalf of clients AT&T and the National Security Agency. Focusing on billboards in the San Francisco area, this improvement action is designed to promote and celebrate the innovative collaboration of these two global communications giants.

"This campaign is an extraordinary rendition of a public-private partnership," observed BLF spokesperson Blank DeCoverly. "These two titans of telecom have a long and intimate relationship, dating back to the age of the telegraph. In these dark days of Terrorism, that should be a comfort to every law-abiding citizen with nothing to hide."

AT&T initially downplayed its heroic efforts in the War on Terror, preferring to serve in silence behind the scenes. "But then we realized we had a PR win on our hands," noted AT&T V.P. of Homeland Security James Croppy. "Not only were we helping NSA cut through the cumbersome red tape of the FISA system, we were also helping our customers by handing over their e-mails and phone records to the government. Modern life is so hectic - who has time to cc the feds on every message? It's a great example of how we anticipate our customers' needs and act on them. And, it should be pointed out, we offered this service free of charge."

Commenting on the action, and responding to questions about pending privacy litigation and the stalled Congressional effort to shield the telecoms from these lawsuits, NSA spokesperson [REDACTED] remarked: "[REDACTED] we [REDACTED] condone [REDACTED] warrantless [REDACTED], [REDACTED] SIGINT intercepts, [REDACTED] torture [REDACTED] information retrieval by [REDACTED] means necessary."

"It's a win-win-win situation," noted the BLF's DeCoverly. "NSA gets the data it needs to keep America safe, telecom customers get free services, and AT&T makes a fortune. That kind of cooperation between the public and private sectors should serve as a model to all of us, and a harbinger of things to come."

Come see the improvement at 14th St. and Valencia St. in San Francisco.

The BLF (www.billboardliberation.com) has been improving outdoor advertising since 1977. Prior campaigns have included work for Exxon, R.J. Reynolds, and Apple Computers.

AT&T (www.att.com) is America's favorite telecommunications trust. Based in San Antonio, Texas, it has over 300,000 employees and annual revenues of $117 Billion.

NSA (www.nsa.gov) is the largest intelligence organization in the world. Headquartered at Fort Meade, Maryland, its budget, personnel, products, and services are all classified.

Blank DeCoverly
BLF Minister of Propaganda

[Billboard Liberation Front via Boing Boing] ]]>
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:20:38 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361991&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ DARPA Robot Crusher Truck Earns Its Name ]]> There isn't anyone inside this six-and-half-ton beast, getting off on smashing through crappy 80s cars. No, the Army's latest baby, built by Carnegie Mellon's Robotics Engineering Center, is a robot. The Crusher navigates (and destroys) autonomously and will climb four-foot "steps" as easy as it tears up a hill. Apparently other vehicles in their Future Combat System family will take after this big bad monster truck, officially bringing the Army into the business of wrecking ass. With robots. [Danger Room, Vid via IEEE]

]]>
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:00:41 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359448&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Do Not Call (Ever) Improvement Act Signed Into Law ]]> bill.jpgThe bill to make the Do-Not-Call registry everlasting—so you never have to remind the government that you hate telemarketers—has been made into a real live law by President Bush. [Consumerist]

]]>
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:00:32 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358732&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Snuggly the Security Bear Explains: Warrantless Wiretapping Is All About Love and Freedom ]]> If you're still confused about the whole warrantless domestic spying program that the telecoms colluded with the government on (which is being conveniently shuffled away from official scrutiny, forever), Snuggly the Security Bear by Mark Fiore sums it all up in the absolute cuddliest way possible. [Mark Fiore via BoingBoing]

]]>
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:25:05 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356837&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Last Chance to Save Our Privacy Rights from Warrantless Domestic Spying ]]> While the Senate passed the bill giving telecoms like AT&T and Verizon a free pass on their collusion with government to warrentlessly wiretap American citizens, there's one last hope we might one day find out the scope and depth of the program. The House's version of the bill does not include a telecom immunity provision, meaning they have to square it up w/ the Senate before sending it off for Bush's rubber stamp, and a bunch of Reps are taking a stand. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has forms and contact info set up for people to sound off to their respective Reps to support the House's version and our privacy rights. [EFF, Image via Digital Blasphemy]

]]>
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:14:36 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356387&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Biometric Social Security Cards Proposed to Combat ID Theft ]]> Two Illinois congressmen are introducing legislation with the goal of upgrading that flimsy paper piece of crap we call a social security card to include a photo, fingerprint and computer ID chip. Recent data shows that nearly $45 billion is lost each year due to identity theft, which makes it increasingly necessary to safeguard our important documents from fraud. The only drawback is that the new cards will cost around $8 to make as opposed to the current 50 cent price tag. Damn...we've been paying 50 cents for those things? [Chicago Tribune]

]]>
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:50:00 EST Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356201&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Senate Gives Telcos Free Pass On Warrantless Domestic Spying Program ]]> attwiretap.gifJoel at BBG writes in five precise words what it means that the Senate has just granted retroactive immunity to telcos (AT&T, Verizon and others) for participating in the government's warrantless wiretapping program that spied on American citizens: "We Lost. The Telcos Won."

Worse, they even knocked down two proposed amendments that would have at least paid lip service to holding them responsible for their actions. Now we'll never know just how it deep went, how thoroughly they violated any number of things that just shouldn't be fucked with—rights, laws, etc. [NYT]

P.S. How'd our potential prezzes vote? Unsurprisingly, Obama voted against immunity, Hillary didn't vote (too busy crying) and McCain doesn't like anything with wires, so he okayed the spying.

]]>
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:30:07 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=355698&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ House Bill Mandates Colleges Make Plans for Network Filtering ]]> palpatines.jpgI bet you were feeling pretty happy with Congress a little bit ago. Get ready to go back to normal! The College Opportunity and Affordability passed the House today (sounds good so far, right?), but it carries a provision that forces schools to make plans for network filtering mojo and a legal alternative to P2P file-sharing.

Luckily, the provision doesn't have much in the way of teeth right now, but an amendment to safeguard schools' federal funding if they don't comply was pulled yesterday, so it could quickly grow some. Just another reminder of why gov't peeps who know tech and aren't easily confused by slick lobbying are important. [Ars Technica]

]]>
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:30:16 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354527&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Hey Telemarketers, Don't Call Me. Like, Ever. ]]> phone.jpgWith the bill Congress just approved and sent to the Bush-in-Chief, I won't ever have to say that again, since it'll pretty much be the freakin' law. The old version Do-Not-Call registry required you to remind the gov't every couple years you still don't wanna chat w/ telemarketers, but the updated bills from the House and Senate make it pretty much permanent. Conspicuously still missing from banned phone spammers are the ones telling you to vote for Hillary 'cause Obama is a Muslim or McCain because Mitt Romney has too much hair. [Ars Technica]

]]>
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:50:33 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354454&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TSA Apologizes for Being Douches About Gadgets HOORAY BLOGGERS! ]]> So, this new Transportation Security Administration blog is both endearing and creepy. Endearing, because it's cute when bureaucrats try to act like real people with real lives and feelings and whatnot, but creepy because of things like its subtitle: "Terrorists Evolve. Threats Evolve. Security Must Stay Ahead. You Play A Part." Anyhoo, some real bloggers, like Scott at Laughing Squid pointed out to them that at some airports, specifically San Fran's, security people were being dicks about gadgets in bags—making you pull out everything from cords to BlackBerries, not just laptops. The bloggercrats checked into it and guess what? Not kosher!

Consequently, we're treated to a triumphant little post titled HOORAY BLOGGERS!, touting bloggers' "first official impact on [the TSA's] operations." That's right, making local TSA offices follow standard agency procedure is "a win for the blogesphere" [sic, though blogosphere isn't a real word like "the," so maybe I'm being the douche now]. I'm still debating which parts of this are truly disturbing. I'll get back to you. [TSA via BoingBoing]

]]>
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:39:59 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=353731&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Divine Thunderbolt Bunker Buster: Bye Bye Mole People ]]> The Air Force's old bunker buster, BLU-113, was a bunch of explosives crammed inside of an old howitzer barrel. Its latest instrument of boom, the BLU-122, uses a new a steel shell with a hardened nose and 780lbs of thermobaric explosive to pound through 28 feet of concrete or 120 feet of dirt like styrofoam, with 70 percent more explosive power. If that's not the ticket to scattering your bits everywhere, they've also got a bouncy bomb.

Yes, they've got a bubblegum bomb that skips like a stone across water to knock down your door. And land between your legs, no doubt. Still not exploded? How 'bout a guidance system that'll chuck six rubber bullet bombs your door, for some Bomberman-style chain booms. Actually, that sounds awesome: a dude in a Bomberman suit chucking bombs at stuff would own everything. [Danger Room, Danger Room]

]]>
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:10:52 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352547&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Wisconsin Senator Wants to Tax Consoles and Games to Pay for Juvenile Delinquent Rehab Programs ]]> n64.jpgWisconsin State Senator Jon Erpenbach wants to pay to keep non-violent youth offenders out of adult court by funding rehab programs for juveniles declared delinquent by taxing another class of (usually) non-violent delinquents: gamers. His proposed one-percent tax on game consoles and games actually doesn't tack an obscene penalty onto the receipt—$4.50 on an Xbox 360 Elite. We like the idea of the program but not singling out gaming to foot the bill in principle, 'cause it ties gaming to being a bad seed in two ways:

First, by paying for a youth offender/delinquency rehab program it almost implies games are somehow at issue, or at the very least it furthers the connection in Focus on the Family types' minds, and gamers already get enough huff from those mouth-breathers. Second, special taxes like this are usually tacked onto things considered "vices," like cigarettes. And I mean really, MMOs are the only games that truly destroy people's lives like lung cancer, and they should be taxed and labeled appropriately. [Game Politics via Destructoid]

]]>
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:05:02 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336923&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Senate Set to Give Retroactive Immunity to AT&T and Other Telcos for Warrantless Wiretapping Program ]]> attwiretap.gifShould AT&T and the other telcos involved (like Verizon) get a total pass for participating in the NSA's domestic wiretapping program that let the government eavesdrop on Americans without a warrant? The Senate's thisclose to giving them immunity from lawsuits like the one the Electronic Freedom Foundation's filed against AT&T and others.

Mark Klein explained the situation a bit in this video and why he was lobbying against immunity for the telcos—which the FCC declined to investigate. It's this exact bill that's about to pass the Senate, as they've voted to limit debate on it "all but assuring" it gets the rubber stamp. Also included are provisions to essentially legalize the government's actions, effectively expanding its ability to spy within our borders. Scary stuff. [Threat Level, Threat Level]

]]>
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:20:43 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334874&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New Bill Would Make Wi-Fi Hotspots, Email Providers, ISPs Responsible for Obscene Content ]]> The US House of Representatives has a lovely new bill they've just passed that makes everyone responsible for obscenity online if they see it or if it happens to go over their Wi-Fi. It's called the Securing Adolescents From Exploitation Online act (or SAFE, get it?!?), and it's yet another overreaching, reactionary pile of crap from our lovely government. But forget about the huge privacy issues and how the responsibilities it'd place on everyone from hotspot owners to email providers would cripple them, according to a lot of people reporting on it, this'll affect one group above all others: people who are into porn cartoons. Weep for the future!

Yes, despite there being nothing in the bill that specifically references naked cartoons (or Hentai, as they call it in Japan), apparently someone, somewhere realized that cartoon porn falls under the definition of obscenity and realized that their precious wank material was in jeopardy. Mass hysteria!

Let me tell you what the real problem with this bill is, and it has nothing to do with your creepy fetish: if Gmail, for example, is suddenly responsible for everything that passes through its servers, Gmail is dead. There's no way to check every file that everyone emails for child porn (which is the point of this stupid bill), and even if there was it'd be a huge invasion of privacy. And just who would be responsible for keeping the web clean?

That broad definition would cover individuals, coffee shops, libraries, hotels, and even some government agencies that provide Wi-Fi. It also sweeps in social-networking sites, domain name registrars, Internet service providers, and e-mail service providers such as Hotmail and Gmail, and it may require that the complete contents of the user's account be retained for subsequent police inspection
So if anything obscene runs through anything the above parties are responsible for, they get hit with a $300,000 fine. Why don't you just send that douchebag from Dateline to the place where they keep the internet, Congress? He'll be able to sniff out the perverts in no time flat. [SAFE Act via Gadget Lab]
]]>
Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:41:54 EST Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=330796&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The FCC Cuts Comcast Off at the Knees ]]> comcastic.jpgComcast is pissed. Per the FCC's latest vote, it can't provide cable to more than 30 percent of the country. It has a 27 percent market share right now with 26.2 million subscribers. With the FCC's 30 percent market cap, it can add fewer than 3 million new subscribers before it hits the wall, pretty much ruling out acquisitions of other cable companies or any major growth.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin's proposal to limit the growth of cable providers had been floating around for a bit and was sort of expected not to fly, but two of the four other commissioners have thrown in with him on the vote. It's possible—if not probable—that the courts could get involved and throw out the decision, which Reuters points out they did six years ago.

The final vote's expected to go down sometime before Dec. 18—so the two commissioners have time to change their mind—but Comcast will probably start rabble-rousing long before then. They're probably already in the vicinity anyway, going on about the FCC's decision a few weeks ago killing apartment-exclusive contracts. All in all, quite a beating for cable from the FCC this month. [WSJ, Reuters, Flickr]

]]>
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:40:13 EST Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328782&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New Bill Would Deny Schools' Funding if They Don't Comply with the RIAA ]]> In a ridiculous display of just how much you can get done in government if you have enough money, a new bill on the House floor states that if colleges don't police their networks and do the RIAA and MPAA's bidding as well as buy into services such as Napster for their entire student body, they'll lose all their federal funding. Yep, that means if a college doesn't want to hand over names to the RIAA they'll lose things like their Pell grants, depriving thousands of low-income students from financial aid. Wow.

Just in case you weren't sure whether or not the RIAA was completely evil, this pretty much proves it. A letter from a group of university officials has this to say about the bill:

Such an extraordinarily inappropriate and punitive outcome would result in all students on that campus losing their federal financial aid—including Pell grants and student loans that are essential to their ability to attend college, advance their education, and acquire the skills necessary to compete in the 21st-century economy.
Hopefully the offending language will be sliced right out of this bill before it has a chance to become a law, forcing universities to become lapdogs of an industry group because said industry group has lots and lots of money for lobbyists. [News.com via Broadband Reports]
]]>
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:30:00 EST Adam Frucci http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=321541&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Uncle Sam Wants to Know How You Feel About E-Voting Machines ]]> evoting.jpgIf you're not exactly down with the state of e-voting in the US (and you really shouldn't be), the Election Assistance Committee (a federal oversight committee that now has reign over certifying e-voting machines) wants to hear about it and what you think of their recently proposed guidelines (PDF, 600 pages).

Ostensibly they're designed to improve notoriously non-existent security, but they were drafted in part by reps from voting machine companies. One place to start, besides simply saying the machines should be more secure and add paper trails, would be to push for them to use open source code, according to some researchers. Regardless of what you think, you have 120 days to let 'em know. And you should, even if you aren't registered to vote (like me) so maybe at least someone else's vote will be worthwhile. [EAC via Threat Level]

]]>
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:20:10 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317495&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The House has agreed 402-0 to the Senate's ... ]]> The House has agreed 402-0 to the Senate's version of the net access tax ban, so the bill heading President Bush's way runs to 2014. Hooray. [CNET]

]]>
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:10:43 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316841&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Senate Passes Seven-Year Extension of Net Access Tax Ban ]]> Showing the House who's in the lower chamber of the bicameral setup, the Senate passed a seven-year extension on the net tax ban, three years longer than the four-year ban that passed the House. Better deal for us, right? Well, since they didn't match up exactly, they'll have to work together to hammer out the differences, hopefully before the current moratorium goes rotten on Nov. 1. Republicans continued to advocate for a permanent ban, but apparently Dems blocked a vote on it. Boooo taxes. [Yahoo!/Reuters]

]]>
Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:40:01 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315500&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Congressman Hates on Comcast for BitTorrent Blockage, Won't Do Anything About It ]]> uncletorrent.jpgAt least one Congressman is telling Comcast to take a break from its experiment proving why we need net neutrality—Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va), a consumer advocate, told CNet's Chris Soghoian that "Comcast has made a major mistake in attempting to hinder peer-to-peer file sharing as an aspect of its network management" as "file sharing is already being used for a wide variety of perfectly lawful and appropriate applications." More point-blankly, he added Comcast "should not engage in a blanket disqualification of any category of lawful applications." But, he's not willing to put his law-writing pen where his mouth is, bucking at the proposition of legislation—instead he's advocating letting the market take care of it. Cause it's already doing so well solving our telco issues. [CNet]


]]>
Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:30:47 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315246&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The four-year extension of the net access ... ]]> smallbtp.jpgThe four-year extension of the net access tax ban has passed the House, 405-2. But it leaves the door open for taxes on "voice, audio or video programming" delivered through the intertubes, so VoIP and IPTV might be future tax revenue boosters. [CNet]

]]>
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:21:51 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=311574&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ House Judiciary Votes to Extend Ban on Net Access Tax by Four More Years ]]> The ban on taxing your intertube access is set to drop dead next month, but signs are looking decent it's taxation you won't have to worry about for at least another few years—the House Judiciary Committee voted 38 to zip passing an amendment to the Internet Tax Freedom Act that stretches the tax-freeness out another four years.

For once, lobbying groups and ISPs are on our side, actually arguing to make the ban permanent, though cities and states undoubtedly wouldn't mind the free drink of water a broadband tax dangles in front of them. The bill hits the House next term, probably (hopefully) before the current ban expires, though the Senate's taking its sweet time. [Ars]

]]>
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:20:37 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309967&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ California Bans Mandatory Subdermal RFID Tagging ]]> Paranoid California readers, you can now relax thanks to Senate Bill 362. No longer can employers require you and your coworkers to have RFID chips embedded in your skin. If they are caught doing so the State of California will slap them with an initial $10,000 fine, followed by a subsequent $1,000 fine for each day the subdermal chip stays implanted. Although you'd have to know about the chip to report them, right? And if your company is the type to implant RFID chips in their employees, wouldn't it be feasible for them to secretly implant them? Oh great, new things to worry about. [Ars Technica]

]]>
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:10:36 EDT blongo3 http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=296276&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Germany Bans "Hacker Tools" - Punishment Half that of Kiddie Porn ]]> In a law left vague enough for ridiculous exploitation, the German government has just passed Paragraph 202C, which states that it's illegal to possess, produce, use or distribute a "hacker tool".

Make points out that the law could easily encompass network monitoring systems, and that since the ban, Kismac WiFi detection software has shut down. Here is the note left on Kismac's site:

With the introduction of §202c German politicians proved their complete incompetence. Law in Germany: possession of child pornography - two years imprisonment. Distribution of security software is half as bad. Even worse politicians still believe in the successful ban of digital information, obviously not reckoning globalization.
We are heading straight to a country I do not want to be living in.
There are legitimate threats that this bill will stop. But my guess is the government will create more defiant computer users as a result. [make and Kismac] ]]>
Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:45:35 EDT Mark Wilson http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288500&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Senate Bill Could Compel "Top 25 Piracy Schools" to Use Anti-P2P Technology ]]> palpatines.jpgSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid (pictured) has a fun summer vacation souvenir for institutes of higher education: His latest amendment to the Higher Education Reauthorization Act would require a college named to the list of "top 25" worst file-sharing schools to implement anti-p2p technology into its network, or risk losing some of its governmental funding. (Ohio University, natch.)

Basically, if a school gets enough subpoenas in the mail from the MPAA and/or RIAA to make the top 25, they go on "probation." At that point they have to prove to the Secretary of Education that they're going to foist a "technology-based deterrent to prevent the illegal downloading or peer-to-peer distribution of intellectual property" upon its hapless student body.

Naturally, provisions aren't laid out in the amendment for how the data provided by copyright holders is collected or verified at all. But it's not like the RIAA's ever been wrong or anything. [Ars Technica]

]]>
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:30:53 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281726&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Black Helicopters Following Bush Jam Cell Phones, Hover in Silent Mode ]]> blackheli.jpgWhen our esteemed leader visits the terrorist nation of Australia in September to attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, a helicopter that jams cellphone signals within the span of a football field will tail his motorcade. The measure is intended to counter cellphone-detonated bomb attacks, but I mean, now don't the turrists know they have a few months to work around the whole dead mobile deal?

Plus, if they want to find him, won't the massive rolling mobile outage give a pretty good indication of his position? That said, I'd like to borrow the gear next time I hit the airport.

Banned: Mobile calls while Bush in Sydney [ZDNet Australia via Slashdot]
Image via ASM

]]>
Thu, 17 May 2007 11:42:46 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261255&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Proposed Legislation Would Put "Attempted" Pirates in Brig for 1-10 Years ]]> On the same day it announced the 50th conviction stemming from its massive piracy sweep, Operation Fastlink—of a member of the Apocalypse Crew (best known for dropping albums pre-street date)—the Department of Justice proposed new legislation—dubbed the Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007—that would punish copyright infringement more harshly than ever, with no distinction between "attempts" and acts. Repeat offenders will suffer "stronger penalties" still.

DoJ's logic for throwing an "attempted" copyright infringer in the slammer for 1-10 years? "It is a general tenet of the criminal law that those who attempt to commit a crime but do not complete it are as morally culpable as those who succeed in doing so." Other "intent" clauses are strewn throughout the bill. Hit the jump to make your eyes pop out of your head.

The new legislation gives more teeth to the DMCA as well, adding forfeiture penalties on top of the 10-year sentence and $1 million fine for criminal violations of its anti-circumvention clauses.

It gets better. The Department of Homeland Security will directly notify the RIAA when pirated CDs are imported and intercepted by the government. Your computer, or anything else "intended to be used in any manner" for criminal copyright infringement is subject to forfeiture, on top of fines and jail time.

And CNET says it best here: "Wiretaps would be authorized for investigations of Americans who are "attempting" to infringe copyrights." I'm glad it's not super easy now or anything. Oh wait.

The DoJ press release's highlights:

• Provide stronger penalties for repeat-offenders of the copyright laws;
• Implement broad forfeiture reforms to ensure the ability to forfeit property derived from or used in the commission of criminal intellectual property offenses;
• Strengthen restitution provisions for certain intellectual property crimes (e.g., criminal copyright and DMCA offenses);
• Ensure that the exportation and transhipment of copyright-infringing goods is a crime, just as the exportation of counterfeit goods is now criminal.
The days of free-flowing copies of Windows XP, Justin Timberlake and Doom 3 seem to be approaching their twilight. Does copyright infringement really merit 10 years in PMITA prison?

Gonzales proposes new crime: 'Attempted' copyright infringement [CNET via Consumerist]
Press Release [DoJ]
Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007 [Politechbot]

]]>
Tue, 15 May 2007 15:14:50 EDT Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260732&view=rss&microfeed=true