To be pedantic, the grenades aren't actually laser-guided. That implies that they home on reflected laser energy and have an internal guidance mechanism. This is simply a rangefinding and automated sight elevation system, which is quite ingenious in its own right but not the same thing as a true laser guidance system. [In my head, I hear Sheldon from Big Bang Theory saying all this]
I actually have a grenade launcher, but it's been modified to lob golf balls with parade blanks. This little cutie looks like it could be a real improvement in my golf game. Must ask Santa for one.
For the rest of you out there with raised eyebrows, it's that one particular acid-blooded xenomorphic bitch from the movies. Not just, you know, bitches in general.
@robotsneedhugs2: No no no. Don't you see? That's what the grenades are for. The ammo count is for when you're sitting on top of the local mall playing shoot the celebrity look-alike.
@robotsneedhugs2: That's why... Uh, you know, we use technology to count everything for us, and also calculate the lead we're going to need on our grenades.
@robotsneedhugs2: When you're cruising through the hoards you can leisurely count and shoot at the same time. Besides, gotta save bullets. Projectile weaponry is only as good as the ammo cache you can carry, and my armor-plated Winnebago can't carry it all yanno.
@Kaiser-Machead: Now a real killer, when he picked up the SCAR assault rifle, would have immediately asked about the little red button on the bottom of the gun.
At least retinal scanning would prohibit a Bad Guy from using it for aimed shots.
Maybe they could have a "timed login" that would allow continuous use as long as the weapon is kept in motion... logging out and requiring new biometric login after the weapon is motionless for a preset period. That way the Good Guys could take gloves off briefly, log in to their weapon, and put them back on.
Still NOT good when ambushed... but better than having to fight bare-handed.
@Synthfilker: I was sarcastically pointing out the flaw in having a biometric system on a weapon for military personnel. Biometrics always add a lag to firearm activation, a lag that would not be permissible in warfare.
I'd think that the greatest lag is always going to be the reaction time. The goal is to trim that down as low as it can go but in the end its just an inherent part about how the human body works.
I'd think that in any situation as soon as the brain told the body to pick up the gun, raise the gun, and pull the trigger the biometric part would have already done its job.
@tande04: With our current systems, there will be a lag. Perhaps one day that lag may be imperceptible, but as of now, they are nowhere near close enough to be usable. Right now, the current tech also does not always recognize the user perfectly, having a 90% success rate. In life or death situations, that is not permissible. The closest and best tech is looking at using RFID tags, but even that is problematic as there is the potential that the RFID tags could be jammed.
@Nathan Obbards: There would also need to be some sort of permissions. I mean, if my gun jams and my buddy goes down next to me, I'm gonna grab his gun. Need to be sure though that it doesn't lock me out.
What I don't get, is why we need all this super tech for the guns. Yes, I can see benefiting from this stuff in specific situations, but overall, they need to be robust and indestructable. They need to be an AK-47.
@FartSponge: It's for safety (think kids) and so that guns cannot be used agains the person who carries them (criminals with police officers, opposing forces, etc).
Giz seems to be getting more and more hot on weapons... Sometime, like with the big fricken lasers, I get it, mostly seems just sort of penis envy, even more then general gadget stuff :)
People that still say Assault Rifle when talking about civilian arms just prove they have no idea what they are talking about. Assault Weapon is a less apt marketing term than Sport Utility Rifle
An assault rifle by definition is a rifle that can fire fully automatic. In fact I would argue that this does not even make the pistol into a carbine. A carbine is characterized by the fact that it actually has a longer barrel, which allows it to be more accurate; a longer barrel compared to a pistol but shorter compared to a full-size rifle.
I would have to agree, this conversion is essentially worthless. You could just purchase a Kriss Super V and have something small sized that you can use as a small SMG also.
Edit: Actually, after watching it in action I can see that it would not necessarily be worthless. I think it is worthless for the market it is aiming for but the American civilian market would be a much better fit for it. It could be marketed there as a small home defense weapon. The forward handgrip and stock would make it much easier to control and manipulate for the average user but much more so for small framed individuals (the ladies for example). This conversion is basically just the right size for a controllable home defense weapon.
I personally would not mind slapping a glock into one of those instead of buying a separate carbine solely for that purpose. If just to try it out.
@slim934: As has been stated repeatedly in many of the comments here; Attaching this device to a pistol inside of the United States creates an AOW/SBR device, which is controlled by the NFA sections of the firearms code. The ATF will not give you a slap on the wrist for this; Typical offenses can carry a ten year stay in prison, and many thousands of dollars in fines.
The only way to avoid this is to fill out a Tax Stamp application complete with a signature from your local Chief of Police, fingerprint cards and photos in duplicate, and a completed form along with a $200 check. Upon approval of the application by the ATF (up to 90 days) then, and ONLY then is it legal for a US Civilian to possess this device in their home.
For the costs invested, there are much better choices in home defense firearms.
These kind of things are a little silly. Why go threw the effort to put all this on your pistol instead of getting a actual rifle? You don't gain THAT much stability.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
I understand now, well stated.
11/20/09
For the rest of you out there with raised eyebrows, it's that one particular acid-blooded xenomorphic bitch from the movies. Not just, you know, bitches in general.
11/20/09
It's Friday.
11/20/09
[zombietools.net]
11/20/09
Awesome.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
Yeah... with gloves on? Epic fail.
At least retinal scanning would prohibit a Bad Guy from using it for aimed shots.
Maybe they could have a "timed login" that would allow continuous use as long as the weapon is kept in motion... logging out and requiring new biometric login after the weapon is motionless for a preset period. That way the Good Guys could take gloves off briefly, log in to their weapon, and put them back on.
Still NOT good when ambushed... but better than having to fight bare-handed.
11/20/09
11/20/09
I'd think that the greatest lag is always going to be the reaction time. The goal is to trim that down as low as it can go but in the end its just an inherent part about how the human body works.
I'd think that in any situation as soon as the brain told the body to pick up the gun, raise the gun, and pull the trigger the biometric part would have already done its job.
11/20/09
11/20/09
What I don't get, is why we need all this super tech for the guns. Yes, I can see benefiting from this stuff in specific situations, but overall, they need to be robust and indestructable. They need to be an AK-47.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
People that still say Assault Rifle when talking about civilian arms just prove they have no idea what they are talking about. Assault Weapon is a less apt marketing term than Sport Utility Rifle
11/20/09
An assault rifle by definition is a rifle that can fire fully automatic. In fact I would argue that this does not even make the pistol into a carbine. A carbine is characterized by the fact that it actually has a longer barrel, which allows it to be more accurate; a longer barrel compared to a pistol but shorter compared to a full-size rifle.
I would have to agree, this conversion is essentially worthless. You could just purchase a Kriss Super V and have something small sized that you can use as a small SMG also.
Edit: Actually, after watching it in action I can see that it would not necessarily be worthless. I think it is worthless for the market it is aiming for but the American civilian market would be a much better fit for it. It could be marketed there as a small home defense weapon. The forward handgrip and stock would make it much easier to control and manipulate for the average user but much more so for small framed individuals (the ladies for example). This conversion is basically just the right size for a controllable home defense weapon.
I personally would not mind slapping a glock into one of those instead of buying a separate carbine solely for that purpose. If just to try it out.
11/20/09
The only way to avoid this is to fill out a Tax Stamp application complete with a signature from your local Chief of Police, fingerprint cards and photos in duplicate, and a completed form along with a $200 check. Upon approval of the application by the ATF (up to 90 days) then, and ONLY then is it legal for a US Civilian to possess this device in their home.
For the costs invested, there are much better choices in home defense firearms.
11/20/09
11/20/09
Wow! Maybe there is a market for my "make any rifle a bazooka" line of products after all!
11/20/09
11/20/09