Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I agree with Curves and Lite. Unless the only thing you carry around on this is your 2lb rat dog, which a little less unappealing in a winker basket with daisies, this spells disaster.
Place enough weight in there and you'll be spending most of your attention trying to keep it from wobbling down the road, hence, you will not notice that dump truck that knocks your head off.
Yes, because really. Putting a large mass on your handlebars and swinging it back and forth is really a great idea. Rather than say, mounding it in a location (back) of the bike where it won't suffer from that problem.
Sorry, but this really is one of the more moronic concepts I've seen when it comes to poorly applied ideas involving physics, mass, and a moving object.
@Lite: The other catch here is that if you put that weight on the front of a bike with suspension the bike will feel even more sluggish going over bumps than normal.
Yeah, that may be true, but living in a town that has an awful lot of cyclists (we made a Guinness world record attempt at "longest bicycle parade" last year, i think we may have got it) baskets on the front handle bars are quite common as it is. This is at least slightly better than those in that it appears to be sturdy. But Strongly agreed, adding extra inertia to your turning mechanism is just a really really bad idea.
@TennysonPate: A much better application would have been to weld mounts to the front of the fork ala drink holders already attached to your frame, so that the weight does not swing with the handle bars. It's basic physics. If you're riding home with a jug of milk and a 6 pack of beer that's 12 pounds you're whipping back and forth to make turns.
@Lite: I frequently carry grocery's home in my basket and would appreciate a more sturdy one. As for the whole mount it in the back versus front thing, what about when you have the back full already. 2 panniers and a bag on the rack?
When a bike is fully loaded back and front then it trakes very well.
@Cheatachu: I assumed that a bike messenger came up with it, which means brakes are optional or the bike is a "cyclist trendy" fixed ratio setup that is becoming popular.
@harold_b: As opposed to my above suggestion of mounting the basket directly to the front of the frame so that the weight doesn't pivot and affect how much effort you need to put in to steering your bike?
Needs vertical reinforcements so when kids have other kids ride in the baskets, they dont all fall and injure themselves when it breaks under their weight.
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/28/09
Place enough weight in there and you'll be spending most of your attention trying to keep it from wobbling down the road, hence, you will not notice that dump truck that knocks your head off.
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/28/09
now you be sure to tells us if strangers ever approach you in a a van and tell you they have puppies. cause it's a trick john. it's a trick.
04/28/09
04/28/09
Sorry, but this really is one of the more moronic concepts I've seen when it comes to poorly applied ideas involving physics, mass, and a moving object.
04/28/09
you mean besides taking the brakes off the bike?
04/28/09
04/28/09
Yeah, that may be true, but living in a town that has an awful lot of cyclists (we made a Guinness world record attempt at "longest bicycle parade" last year, i think we may have got it) baskets on the front handle bars are quite common as it is. This is at least slightly better than those in that it appears to be sturdy. But Strongly agreed, adding extra inertia to your turning mechanism is just a really really bad idea.
04/28/09
04/28/09
04/28/09
When a bike is fully loaded back and front then it trakes very well.
04/28/09
04/28/09
Either correct me with an example, or keep your useless trollish commentary to yourself.
04/28/09
04/28/09