Maybe its just me but I feel as though from now on we should do touchscreen only. Buttons should not be used in new phones and gadgets. I don't know about this phone but i see three buttons on the cover and it's a future concept.
Benefits of touchscreen are much more then the ones of button phones.
As much as I hate to say it, exclusivity deals make sense in the US. The underlying network here is just all disjointed, to do a phone like the iPhone or G1 for all carriers would require at least three different versions (one for ATT, one for T-Mo, and a CDMA), and I'm not just talking tweaks to the software, I'm talking different frequency radios.
In Europe, where the specs on the networks are fairly standardized it would work. But the infrastructure is just too screwed up over here.
I would like to see the FCC do something about the rates, a text message does not put $0.20 of load on the network, you can't control when somebody sends one to you, and unlike a call you can't "decline" a text message from someone you don't know so you are going to be charged for them. You have to specifically shut off text messaging on your plan, and then you can't get any, whether they're from someone you know or not.
Here's what I would like to see:
Ala Carte plans - pick your number of anytime minutes, whether you get unlimited nights/weekend/mobile to mobile/incoming/calls to [X number] of numbers, and how much, if any, data is included.
$0.05 Text Messages - They're sent using control bandwidth and cost essentially nothing.
Advertised prices must include all applicable taxes and fees - I'm sick of this sh*t where they advertise a plan @ $39.95 a month and then after taxes and fees it's $80 a month but there's no way to actually know that until you're a signature away from being stuck for two years.
I don't think any of my requests are outlandish, I'm not asking them to give service away or even abandon their friend the "two year contract"... just asking them to use lube when they ream us.
Ok, I really don't get your position. You're asking the FCC to do something about this and that, when doing away with exclusivity arrangements would take care of all of those problems for you. Yet, you are for exclusivity arrangements?
And, for the record, swapping out radio chips is not that expensive when you're doing it by the millions. It would end up adding, maybe $4/phone, but probably more like nothing.
@robertburke: Getting rid of exclusivity agreements wouldn't affect any of the things I mentioned because they all do them.
I'm not for exclusivity agreements but they make sense here. I could get an iPhone 3G, unlock it an use it on T-Mo, but I wouldn't be able to use it's full potential, same goes the other way with the G1.
As for different band radios, it's not as simple as just switching out a chip, at the bare minimum they would have to get each version certified with the FCC and other regulatory bodies. You'd probably be looking at different processor packages between the GSM and CDMA versions due to the extreme integration which is required to cram all the stuff we want into such a small package. If we were talking about Europe, no problem, there's a standard, meet it and your device will work on 90%+ of the networks... exclusivity agreements over there don't make sense, which is why they're far more rare.
I fail to see how this "devolving in to the lowest common denominator" argument makes any sense. We don't see collusion in the marketplace at this level with any other product, and yet there is just as much innovation in every other segment. Has a failure to establish a soap oligopoly left consumers with a dearth of choices for laundry detergent? I don't think so.
BTW: thanks John, for kicking this all off. I knew someone was reading my comments, I just didn't know you would do anything about it.
I'm going to go with exclusivity increasing innovation, the iPhone forced companies like T-Mobile and Sprint to dive in head first with good alternatives to battle the iPhone because they couldn't get it. In the case of the Pre we are likely going to exciting exclusive platforms for various carriers utilizing the same OS.
Without the exclusivity deals, the carriers wouldn't be subsidizing the devices even close to the amount they are now. You think the bitching from iPhone 3GS coveters was bad when they found out they had to pay so much for the new one, imagine if all new devices were $500+.
@Daniel Parmelee: Agreed, probably a lack of marketing/carrier subsidies... Also, that keyboard looks so damn functional, I just wanna text all day on that bad boy.
@NeoAkira: Look up the definition of the word "think". Then do it. Now, look back at your comment. Repeat until you realize how stupid that comment was.
SD cards so far have 32GB capacities. MicroSD on the other hand, 8. now look up the definition of the word "dumbass". Now look at your comment, then in the mirror. Repeat until you realize you're a dumbass.
Yeah I figured that was probably the biggest reason, but seeing as how cellphone companies are trying to make our phones function as a personal camera and MP3 player as well, it only makes sense to me to use the slightly bigger memory format that has the much higher capacity.
I dunno how large you think SD cards are but I'll give you a clue. Stop comparing them to the size of your penis and compare them to the size of the phones they'd be in and you'll realize they're really not that big. Especially with similar-sized digital cameras using them just fine.
11/01/09
11/01/09
11/01/09
11/01/09
07/04/09
Benefits of touchscreen are much more then the ones of button phones.
07/05/09
06/19/09
In Europe, where the specs on the networks are fairly standardized it would work. But the infrastructure is just too screwed up over here.
I would like to see the FCC do something about the rates, a text message does not put $0.20 of load on the network, you can't control when somebody sends one to you, and unlike a call you can't "decline" a text message from someone you don't know so you are going to be charged for them. You have to specifically shut off text messaging on your plan, and then you can't get any, whether they're from someone you know or not.
Here's what I would like to see:
Ala Carte plans - pick your number of anytime minutes, whether you get unlimited nights/weekend/mobile to mobile/incoming/calls to [X number] of numbers, and how much, if any, data is included.
$0.05 Text Messages - They're sent using control bandwidth and cost essentially nothing.
Advertised prices must include all applicable taxes and fees - I'm sick of this sh*t where they advertise a plan @ $39.95 a month and then after taxes and fees it's $80 a month but there's no way to actually know that until you're a signature away from being stuck for two years.
I don't think any of my requests are outlandish, I'm not asking them to give service away or even abandon their friend the "two year contract"... just asking them to use lube when they ream us.
06/19/09
Ok, I really don't get your position. You're asking the FCC to do something about this and that, when doing away with exclusivity arrangements would take care of all of those problems for you. Yet, you are for exclusivity arrangements?
And, for the record, swapping out radio chips is not that expensive when you're doing it by the millions. It would end up adding, maybe $4/phone, but probably more like nothing.
06/20/09
I'm not for exclusivity agreements but they make sense here. I could get an iPhone 3G, unlock it an use it on T-Mo, but I wouldn't be able to use it's full potential, same goes the other way with the G1.
As for different band radios, it's not as simple as just switching out a chip, at the bare minimum they would have to get each version certified with the FCC and other regulatory bodies. You'd probably be looking at different processor packages between the GSM and CDMA versions due to the extreme integration which is required to cram all the stuff we want into such a small package. If we were talking about Europe, no problem, there's a standard, meet it and your device will work on 90%+ of the networks... exclusivity agreements over there don't make sense, which is why they're far more rare.
06/19/09
BTW: thanks John, for kicking this all off. I knew someone was reading my comments, I just didn't know you would do anything about it.
06/19/09
06/19/09
Your logic is backwards as it assumes that if the iPhone was available for all carriers everyone would give up on trying to make a better phone.
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/07/09
06/07/09
05/17/09
05/17/09
05/18/09
SD cards so far have 32GB capacities. MicroSD on the other hand, 8. now look up the definition of the word "dumbass". Now look at your comment, then in the mirror. Repeat until you realize you're a dumbass.
@yogibimbi:
Yeah I figured that was probably the biggest reason, but seeing as how cellphone companies are trying to make our phones function as a personal camera and MP3 player as well, it only makes sense to me to use the slightly bigger memory format that has the much higher capacity.
05/18/09
What the hell kind of idiot question is that? thats like asking why they dont use dvd= roms on a psp or 3.5 inch drives in a laptop. There too big!
05/18/09
I dunno how large you think SD cards are but I'll give you a clue. Stop comparing them to the size of your penis and compare them to the size of the phones they'd be in and you'll realize they're really not that big. Especially with similar-sized digital cameras using them just fine.
05/17/09
I kid.
02/02/09
02/02/09
11/06/08
Worst mistake I ever made. :(
11/06/08
"Great! Let's make it!"
"But you haven't even heard i..."
"Excellent, let's make that one too!"
"Sir, I also have an..."
"Six versions of that one, all different colors!"
"Do we really want to floo..."
"Twenty colors of that one! And put a clock on it!"
11/06/08
You know, they actually do customer focus groups to pick the colors.
I wonder where they find these weirdos....