• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#harddrive#haikucodedrive2008

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 3:11 PM
Fri Dec 11
66 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Scott Crawford Scott Crawford
    11/29/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    Good and amusing but as others point out, still room for improvement. Surely film came before the photo....and there were more before the flloppy....starting with punchcards and magnetic reels, tapes. Still, good effort though!
     Reply
    SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! approved this comment Scott Crawford was starred Scott Crawford was unstarred
    Image of SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!!
    11/29/09

    @Scott Crawford: But punchcards were not really an storage device, but input methods.
     Reply
    SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was starred SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was unstarred
    Image of HurtsSoGood HurtsSoGood
    11/29/09

    @SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!!: Actually, they were both.
     Reply
    HurtsSoGood was starred HurtsSoGood was unstarred
    Image of denisnossevitch denisnossevitch
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    WTF is a wax cylinder? Is that that thing they use as candles in church?
     Reply
    lostarchitect promoted this comment denisnossevitch was starred denisnossevitch was unstarred
    Image of lostarchitect lostarchitect
    11/28/09

    @denisnossevitch: I'm assuming you're kidding.. but just in case:
    [en.wikipedia.org]
     Reply
    lostarchitect was starred lostarchitect was unstarred
    Image of denisnossevitch denisnossevitch
    11/29/09

    @lostarchitect: Wow that wiki changed my life. They had technology back in 1888?!
     Reply
    denisnossevitch was starred denisnossevitch was unstarred
    Image of KhaiJB KhaiJB
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    he missed out C90 tapes and C120's with cassette tapes.. C60's were hardly used...
     Reply
    KhaiJB was starred KhaiJB was unstarred
    Image of HurtsSoGood HurtsSoGood
    11/29/09

    @KhaiJB: They were too. Longer cassettes got eaten more often, and the C-60s were dirt cheap.
     Reply
    HurtsSoGood was starred HurtsSoGood was unstarred
    Image of KhaiJB KhaiJB
    11/29/09

    @KhaiJB: *shrug* going by where I lived.. C90's and 120's sold more than the C60's. tho mainly C90's.
     Reply
    KhaiJB was starred KhaiJB was unstarred
    Image of RipRapRob RipRapRob
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    The constant change of units makes the chart much less informative than it could have been.

    The same goes for using the same color for a minute of music, one photo (what size?) and one MB.

    Plus the size of the Flash-drive compared to ... is that a CD, DVD or Blu-ray? One or two layers?

    And at first glance it looks like a 2.5" 500GB HD only contains 50 GB. Same for 3.5" 2TB HD.

    All because the 'headers' for these suddenly is the size of each unit/colored square, and not the to total capacity, as it is on the rest of the chart.

    It's not enough to make a chart that looks nice. It has to present the information in a way that makes more sense than just listing the data.
     Reply
    lostarchitect promoted this comment RipRapRob was starred RipRapRob was unstarred
    Image of os_2 os_2
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    ah.. 5 1/4" floopies, I remember punching holes on other side so I can use the backside for storage. It seems like it was yesterday.
     Reply
    Curves promoted this comment os_2 was starred os_2 was unstarred
    Image of Curves Curves
    11/28/09

    @os_2: I just cleaned out my "tech and media" closet and found a set of like six 5.25" install disks for for some old software.

    Obviously, I need to clean out that closet more often.
     Reply
    Curves was starred Curves was unstarred
    Image of bubbagrump bubbagrump
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    Syquest drives? tape drives? it's nice but not very complete.
     Reply
    dingus promoted this comment bubbagrump was starred bubbagrump was unstarred
    Image of dingus dingus
    11/28/09

    @bubbagrump: No 9 tracks, disk packs, or punch cards. Clearly the guy who made this had his first computer come in a cow-patterned box.
     Reply
    dingus was starred dingus was unstarred
    Image of Kingofhearts589 Kingofhearts589
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    Color fail on the Data Storage section. Otherwise, great chart.
     Reply
    Homerjay is utterly alone. promoted this comment Kingofhearts589 was starred Kingofhearts589 was unstarred
    Image of BergenCountyJC can't beat MW2 BergenCountyJC can't beat MW2
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    I store everything in my shed. Does that count?
     Reply
    BergenCountyJC can't beat MW2 was starred BergenCountyJC can't beat MW2 was unstarred
    Image of ploopsy ploopsy
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    Long story short.

    Anything that you send back in time will blow the recipients minds.
     Reply
    PN - gooapplesoft promoted this comment ploopsy was starred ploopsy was unstarred
    Image of The Dude The Dude
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    back when we used floppies we had to be much more selective about what we were going to save. i, too, like that we can store anything and everything we'd ever need to, however i still think there was something to be said for just saving the essentials (even without this crazy amount of personal storage we'd still have ways of accessing any information we'd need; it just wouldn't be on our personal machines). i'll go so far as to say that massive personal data storage capabilities (like multi-terabyte hds) are the reason cloud computing is still only in its infancy.
     Reply
    The Dude was starred The Dude was unstarred
    Image of adaorardor adaorardor
    11/28/09

    @back_at_it: hopefully it stays in its infancy. basically, fuck cloud computing.
     Reply
    adaorardor was starred adaorardor was unstarred
    Image of witeowl witeowl
    11/28/09

    @adaorardor: Care to elaborate?
     Reply
    something_unique_and_descriptive promoted this comment witeowl was starred witeowl was unstarred
    Image of something_unique_and_descriptive something_unique_and_descriptive
    11/29/09

    @witeowl: Cloud computing sounds great to everyone who lives in a big developed area. But for those of us out in the sticks who have to deal with spotty wireless coverage, no land-based options for broadband, and the data caps of satellite the idea of relying on a data connection for our computing isn't the most pleasant prospect.

    Then you've got the issue of your data being subject to someone else' mistakes. See the recent Sidekick debacle for a textbook example of why people want to avoid it.
     Reply
    something_unique_and_descriptive was starred something_unique_and_descriptive was unstarred
    Image of MrToblerone MrToblerone
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    I don't know, I still miss them big old 5.25" floppy discs. They felt so futuristic! :D
     Reply
    AmphetamineCrown promoted this comment Edited by MrToblerone at 11/28/09 6:08 PM MrToblerone was starred MrToblerone was unstarred
    Image of AmphetamineCrown AmphetamineCrown
    11/28/09

    @MrToblerone: They were futuristic when you started off with 8" floppy discs...
     Reply
    AmphetamineCrown was starred AmphetamineCrown was unstarred
    Image of Darren Bell Darren Bell
    11/28/09

    @AmphetamineCrown: Winchester Disk packs, now that was the future:

    I've still got a copy of Windows 2.0 on 5.25" floppies :)
     Reply
    dingus approved this comment Darren Bell was starred Darren Bell was unstarred
    Image of dingus dingus
    11/28/09

    @Darren Bell: You haven't experienced Spacewar! until you've played it off the original paper tape.
     Reply
    dingus was starred dingus was unstarred
    Image of PrestonBenz PrestonBenz
    11/28/09

    In reply to Man, We’ve Come a Long Way From Floppies
    I hate to be a negative Nancy, but they got the color coding wrong in the data... they used the red coloring for MB when they should have used the green for GB.

    Fail!
     Reply
    PN - gooapplesoft promoted this comment PrestonBenz was starred PrestonBenz was unstarred
    Image of september11th september11th
    11/28/09

    @PrestonBenz: yes. there are a few other inconsistencies with the way he labeled the data. sometimes the number above the media represents how much the colored blocks are worth, sometimes it represents the total storage of the thing. and with the cd, he just changed the red blocks to count as 100mb each. this man is a huge failure.
     Reply
    PN - gooapplesoft promoted this comment september11th was starred september11th was unstarred
    Image of PN - gooapplesoft PN - gooapplesoft
    11/28/09

    @PrestonBenz: yeah they totally messed up with the key there.
     Reply
    PN - gooapplesoft was starred PN - gooapplesoft was unstarred
    Image of Bokusatsu_Tenshi Bokusatsu_Tenshi
    11/19/09

    In reply to Is There Any Point to the World's First Wireless USB Drive?
    Well, what can I say? Simplicity sells.
    There's one favorite Gizmodo company whose motto is exactly that.

    And you know, the vast majority of computer users don't know much about dealing with wi-fi and servers, so I guess a good number would really pay extra just for the plug and play ability.

    I'm only wondering how the one to one connection works... does each USB key + drive pair have an unique identification? Because if so, the signal interception argument makes sense... and is also great for users who don't know their way around configuring wireless routers and stuff...
     Reply
    Bokusatsu_Tenshi was starred Bokusatsu_Tenshi was unstarred
    Image of blash blash
    11/19/09

    In reply to Is There Any Point to the World's First Wireless USB Drive?
    Why? Let's see...

    1) Put wireless USB fob on your key ring
    2) Pair it with your desktop
    3) Pair it with your laptop

    When you're at home, work on items on the USB fob. Save your work, grab your laptop, and go out. Get to work, open your laptop, and start working again. No need to disconnect and reconnect makes your data appear to almost be in the Cloud but without all the privacy concerns and need for constant internet connection. Drivers can be equipped to encrypt the data for local transmission, pairing codes, etc. etc.

    The price is rather irrelevant since this is a 1st-gen product, eventually the prices will fall to what they are for USB fobs today, and when they do I will buy one. I'm guessing the dongle is a WUSB dongle since the majority of computers don't have it built-in yet... give it time.
     Reply
    blash was starred blash was unstarred
    Image of ceilingFANBOY ceilingFANBOY
    11/19/09

    @blash: You only have a 30 foot range. Unless you work from home, you aren't going to be able to access the drive from work, in which case you might as well just transfer the files to your laptop.
     Reply
    ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred
    Image of blash blash
    11/19/09

    @ceilingFANBOY: I said put the wireless USB fob on your key ring. Do you not take your keys with you when you leave the house? Ergo your data comes with you wherever you go without going through the time needed to plug in the USB fob and transfer the files, since you're just working off the fob all the time.

    Dunno why my explanation doesn't make sense to you... put 2 and 2 together please.
     Reply
    blash was starred blash was unstarred
    Image of ceilingFANBOY ceilingFANBOY
    11/20/09

    @blash: But you would still need the hard drive. If you have room for the hard drive, then you probably have room for a cable connecting your hard drive to your computer. That's all I'm saying. Anyway, with the hard drive being wireless, wouldn't that also mean that you would either have to plug in the hard drive to a wall outlet anyway, or take the risk of using a battery operated hard drive that could die in the middle of a file write? How is that any better than just connecting directly to your computer?
     Reply
    ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred
    Image of blash blash
    11/20/09

    @ceilingFANBOY: Who's talking about a hard drive? Take a USB 16 GB flash memory key fob, put a WUSB chip and a LiOn battery on it, and THAT'S IT! Recharging comes from the once-a-week plugging in, induction charging... remember when you didn't have to recharge your dumb cellphone every day because it had a standby time of a month? Oh, but you forgot because you got a smartphone that goes through the whole battery in a day.
     Reply
    blash was starred blash was unstarred
    Image of ceilingFANBOY ceilingFANBOY
    11/21/09

    @blash: If you don't want to use a hard drive, which is what the article was talking about, and you are only using flash memory which fits on your keys, I don't really see any need for this to be wireless. It would be a lot quicker for the for the computer to connect via a USB plug and more reliable than a wireless connection. About the only use I could see for this is if you could link two or more computers to the same drive at the same time so that you could get sort of a Google Wave or Docs thing going on where multiple people can work on the same document at the same time.
     Reply
    ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred
    Image of blash blash
    11/21/09

    @ceilingFANBOY: Now you're thinkin' :)
     Reply
    blash was starred blash was unstarred
    Image of ceilingFANBOY ceilingFANBOY
    11/24/09

    @blash: The wireless technology itself is all I can find a use for. The actual implementation that is being discussed in this article is what I find fault with. Yes, I know that the first few generations of a technology may not necessarily live up to the expectations, but I feel that even with current technologies this could have been utilized in a better manner that would have better encouraged others to invest in R&D for this product. As it stands, it seems useless to the majority of people (if even people on a tech site look at it as useless, what do you think the average person is going to see in the product?). Had they instead marketed it as a tool for allowing multiple people to collaborate on a single document without the need of a network that could either be unreliable or a security risk, I feel they would have been on to something.
     Reply
    ceilingFANBOY was starred ceilingFANBOY was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    11/19/09

    In reply to Is There Any Point to the World's First Wireless USB Drive?
    This is junk, and whoever buys it is a sucker, when one could get either a good USB (cabled) drive or a network drive. I can't see any situation whatsoever where this would be remotely useful compared to the alternatives
     Reply
    Edited by Kaiser-Machead at 11/19/09 12:03 PM Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.