<![CDATA[Gizmodo: harry mccracken]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: harry mccracken]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/harrymccracken http://gizmodo.com/tag/harrymccracken <![CDATA[PC World Editor-In Chief Harry McCracken Moving On]]> PC World Editor-in-Chief Harry McCracken announced in a blog entry today that he will be stepping down in June to build his own tech site from scratch. McCracken gained notoriety last May, after temporarily resigning due to the publisher's pressure to kill an anti-Apple piece. Giz wishes Harry the best of luck in the next stage of his career. [PC World]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=389717&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PC World Editor Harry McCracken Returns Victorious]]> In an interesting reversal, departed PC World Editor Harry McCracken has returned to the magazine as "vice-president, editor in chief" as of this morning. What's even more surprising is that CEO Colin Crawford has been dropped from the CEO position and is taking up the executive vice president, online position. He's even given the editorial staff an apology for killing the story. His blog has removed the post about the EIC changes at PC World. The situation sounds sour for him, but I doubt Harry would have returned to work with Crawford after such a public disagreement.

But really, PC World had no choice. After 16 years of service to IDG, and the this current episode highlighting his integrity, the magazine couldn't really move forward without looking like editorial corruption was in place. Unless Harry came back.

His conditions? That "editors were allowed to be editors." He made no comment about whether or not Colin's reshuffled position were the terms of his return.

IDG is going start a search for a CEO for both PC World and Macworld, two magazines that Colin Crawford used to be the CEO of. Our thoughts? All the reader outrage online after the story first broke is what caused the sudden 180. Or, we suppose it's probably more of a 540 since PCWorld actually went ahead and published a tame 10 Things We Hate About Apple anyway.

As an aside, I think it could have been better to have PC World write the "Apple Love" piece, and Macworld write the "Apple Hate" piece. Nothing better than to provide surprising thoughts to your already hypnotized user base.

Editor in Chief Harry McCracken Returns to PC World [PCWorld]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=259146&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PC World Publishes Tame "10 Things We Hate About Apple" Story]]> Everyone was talking late last week about Harry McCracken and his resignation from PC World due to a breach of the editorial/advertising wall. The story, in short, was that Harry wanted to run something called "10 Things We Hate About Apple", and the CEO didn't, because of possibly upsetting advertisers (namely, Apple). Well, PC World ran the story today anyway.

After reading it, we wondered if this was the actual story Harry resigned over—it's quite tame. Complaints about Apple being really secretive, the "i" monicker, lack of Blu-ray, mis-managed hardware like the Puck Mouse or the Toilet Seat iBook, lack of gaming and limited selection has been said and re-said for years. What gives? Was the story de-fanged?

Also, in all the talk last week, there was no mention of a sister article entitled "10 Things We Love About Apple". Was this one thrown together after the fuss in order to both justify the posting of the "hate" article and to soften the blow? We have no idea.

Plus, on the top of both articles there's a link to an editorial note with zero reference to Harry's leaving, the editorial fiddling by the CEO, or any of the controversy itself. They also claim that these pieces were supposed to be "conversation starters" and "not weighty journalism".

In any case, we still wish Harry good luck wherever he ends up next. We also wish the staffers at PC World good luck as well, since it looks like an uphill battle with your new CEO.

10 Things We Hate About Apple [PC World]

10 Things We Love About Apple [PC World]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=258456&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PC World Editorial Firewall Breach, Part 2]]> spartacuskirk2.jpgWired has an interesting follow-up piece about Harry McCracken's resignation from PC World. Crawford's blog says that "We have and will continue to run editorial and content that both praises and criticizes as appropriate without regard to the vendor relationship."

But then a statement from IDG's Howard Sholkin: "The reason is that Colin and Harry had a disagreement on one opinion piece related to Apple and they could not come to a settlement as to how the differences should be resolved so Harry felt that necessitated him resigning." Hello IDG knuckleheads: The fact that management even has a say in editorial matters is wrong.

Crawford simply doesn't have the damn right, and this isn't a tiny little trade mag struggling to survive. Crawford claims the magazine is doing well enough this year, and that sort of financial breathing room should allow for even higher levels of integrity, not less. In the long run, selling out editorial will not lead to financial strength. Get your hands out of the pot, Crawford!

Epicenter's sources paint a picture of a staff meeting where he declares the opposite, though:


Will the next editor-in-chief have last-call on what goes in the magazine or will Crawford, essentially, always be asserting his rank over editors?

"And the answer was no, I'm going to have last call," the source said Crawford told them. "The response, essentially, was that the same damn thing would happen again (if someone clashed with him)."

I've known plenty of great PC World editors over the years, and I respect them all. Personally, I'm sorry they have to work under these conditions.

PC World Update [Wired Epicenter]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=257652&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Incorruptible Editor McCracken Resigns from PC World]]> In case you weren't aware from coverage at our sister sites Valleywag and Gawker, PC World Editor in Chief Harry McCracken has resigned. The reason he resigned—the company's CEO killing a story entitled "Ten Things We Hate About Apple"—shows how the magazine's editorial is fighting hard to keep its integrity, and that McCracken's departure shows that he's not going to put up with this crap.

You see, CEO Crawford apparently told editors that their reviews and articles were too critical of the vendors—the same vendors who advertise in their magazine. Hence, the order came down that they "had to start being nicer to advertisers."

Another reason why it's interesting: according to Wired, the newly minted CEO of PC World, Colin Crawford, used to be CEO of MacWorld. When Colin was at his former job, Steve Jobs would call him up any time the Apple CEO had a problem with a story MacWorld was working on. The two mags, MacWorld and PC World, are owned by the parent company IDG.

Any time ad dollars influence reviews is a bad thing, but when the CEO issues an order directly, well, that's just bad news bears. Maybe the CEO thinks he's helping the company make money, but when no one is buying mags or reading editorial because the CEO's padding the review with ad money, that's going to be pretty bad for business.

When reached for comment, Harry had this to say:

...I resigned yesterday over a disagreement about editorial stuff, and I'm not angry at anyone, and continue to admire IDG and PC World. This company has been very, very good to me—and I have many friends here who I know will continue to do top-notch work. (I'll probably continue to do some writing for PCW, too.)

To Crawford: If you want to make a ton of money, keep editorial sacred, bring back Harry with a raise, apologize to him and the staff, and try to understand that no one wants to read corrupt editorial.

It couldn't have been a decision Harry made lightly, but he made it without hesitation and we commend him for it. And we'd like to take this minute to reiterate that no matter where Gizmodo's ad dollars are coming from, it will in no way affect our reviews. Nobody can pay for pantsworthiness.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=257590&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[PC World Germany's $26K PC From Hell...Part Two]]> When I think of PC World, I think of them as solid, if not a little pale, lab rats of computer review. Harry McCracken, Editor, blogs about his German counterparts, at PC Welt. As you can tell from this pet project $26k PC of theirs, the Höllenmaschine II, PC Welt is a little bit more about metal, S&M, and Hasselhoff. The "Machine from Hell...Part Two", includes top line parts, 4.3 TB of HDD, and a $1k Porsche paint job, and $2500 in watercooling. (What, no phase change?)

It also features Triple Quad to operate Quad CPU, Quad Core, Quad Graphics and even 24 drives simultaneously.
I just want to understand how they spent that much loot and ended up with a mere 24-inch monitor. Oh, I see, they went with a RAID setup using a few 15k RPM Cheetahs SCSI Drives instead of SATA. Owie, that'll cost ya.

The rest of the machine, from its Xeons, Dual Verto Geforce 8800 GTX GPUs, and CPUs are after the jump, if you must know. Did I mention they're giving it all away?

CPU: Two 2.67-GHz quad-core Xeons (meant for servers)

MOTHERBOARD: A Tyan Tempest i5000XL workstation model

RAM: 4GB of fully-buffered, dual-channel Corsair DIMMs

GRAPHICS: Two PNY Verto Geforce 8800 GTX cards, each based on the DirectX 10-supporting Nvidia Geforce 8800 GTX GPU

HARD DISK: Nine (!) drives, with a total of 4.3 terabytes (!!) of space

Höllenmaschine II [PCWorld Blog]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=243939&view=rss&microfeed=true