Why can't they make one cable to rule them all? Shouldn't it be possible to create a single cable that exceeds requirements for all existing formats, and each format can use whatever part of the cable it needs?
@Digitallysick: Displayport is an open free standard, so you know someone is going to try to make something that they can actually make money off of in licensing.
Just another way for them to make the plugs on the ball smaller while keeping the cords the same thickness and the ends almost the same, putting more pressure on the plug on the board, which will lead to more failures. To quote Leo Getz,
"That's how they fuck you. They fuck you with the connectors."
Ummm, Mini DisplayPort to HDMI does not "solve one of the new MacBook's biggest monitor compatibility problems." Even with the monoprice HDMI adapter, you still can't watch HD movies on a display that doesn't support HDCP. However, you can already use a DVI-HDMI adapter to hook up an HDMI display using the mini DisplayPort-DVI adapter.
The mini DisplayPort connection is doing the same thing technically regardless of whether or not you hook up the HDMI adapter or the DVI adapter. (That is, it's a "Dual Mode" connection that switches from DisplayPort mode to the "legacy" DVI/HDMI mode.)
If the connection is transmitting HDCP with the mDP-HDMI adapter, there's no reason why the mDP-DVI-HDMI route won't transmit it too.
I always thought Apple's choice of mini-DisplayPort was because HDMI was based on single link DVI and couldn't push enough pixles to run the 30" ACD... is this right?
@SmritaBabalazi: While that may be true (and sounds about right), it seems strange to alienate 95% of your customer base in order to make the remaining 5% happy, doesn't it?
@SmritaBabalazi: Apple picked DisplayPort because it's the future of computer display technology, not solely because it (technically) supports Dual-Link DVI. That's just something that they get for free.
DisplayPort finally sheds the last vestiges of CRTs from the computer-LCD panel connection and allows a host of other benefits. Electronics Weekly has a great article that covers the differences between HDMI and DisplayPort.
It's too bad about the no sound. I though I had found a workaround with Airfoil ([rogueamoeba.com]), which would be wonderfully convenient since I could route the audio through my Apple TV, but there is such a lag that it's not usable for watching movies.
@itchytooth: While it may not be ideal for all situations, have you tried using Airfoil's included Airfoil Video Player? I use airfoil as well to use my Airtune-equipped Audioengine A2b's. I noticed the horrible lag (2-3s) for QuickTime videos, however simply drag and drop them in the AIrfoil player and through black magic trickery (buffering), the video was synced with the audio.
@Nathan Trumbull: Well, we've been talking about this for months, so apparently you get the Bad Timing Award. Sorry Nathan. But I am impressed about the daisy chain of adapters you got going on there.
@Wilson Rothman: Audio is in the DisplayPort spec, but it's optional. All that would be needed to enable audio on the mini DisplayPort connection is a firmware update, if Apple someday chose to support it.
I own a Macbook, an iPod Touch, and an iPod Shuffle (2nd gen). So, some might consider me to be a "fanboy". However, Apple is REALLY starting to test my patience.
@Hip Nihilist: Yeah, this is where I am - MacBook, iPhone, 2nd gen shuffle. And yes, this bullshit Apple's been pulling lately is testing even my faith. *Fortunately* it's still mainly about DRM (new shuffle headphones notwithstanding), so I don't have to come down on them for messing with the *real* reasons I love Apple stuff (design, OS perfection).
05/08/09
05/08/09
05/08/09
05/08/09
05/08/09
"That's how they fuck you. They fuck you with the connectors."
05/08/09
We shouldn't have micro stuff just because we can, Some things are not meant to be small.
05/08/09
Why can't they just make it small in the first place?
05/08/09
05/08/09
03/28/09
The mini DisplayPort connection is doing the same thing technically regardless of whether or not you hook up the HDMI adapter or the DVI adapter. (That is, it's a "Dual Mode" connection that switches from DisplayPort mode to the "legacy" DVI/HDMI mode.)
If the connection is transmitting HDCP with the mDP-HDMI adapter, there's no reason why the mDP-DVI-HDMI route won't transmit it too.
03/27/09
03/27/09
03/28/09
DisplayPort finally sheds the last vestiges of CRTs from the computer-LCD panel connection and allows a host of other benefits. Electronics Weekly has a great article that covers the differences between HDMI and DisplayPort.
03/27/09
03/28/09
04/02/09
03/27/09
So who gets the bad timing award here? You or me?
03/27/09
03/27/09
Use HDMI = Send $$$ to major competitor for HDMI licensing fee.
Use mini-Displayport = no fees
03/27/09
03/28/09
03/28/09
03/27/09
Can someone over at the Gizmodo labs PLEASE try one of these new cables with the Mac mini, to see if that one does do audio? Kthxbai
03/27/09
03/28/09
03/27/09
03/27/09
03/28/09
03/20/09
Pirate
Bay
DOT ORG
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
03/20/09
Sheesh.
It's like stabbing the pizza delivery guy because the cook put pickles on your pizza.