<![CDATA[Gizmodo: hdcp]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: hdcp]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/hdcp http://gizmodo.com/tag/hdcp <![CDATA[Miniaturized HDMI Connector Is As Small As Micro USB, Still Drives Your HDTV]]> Molex has prototyped a new miniature HDMI connector called Type D, which boasts the whole range of regular HDMI specs—19 pins, 10.2 Gbit/s bandwidth, HDCP, etc.—in a package the size of a Micro USB cable.

A compact HDMI plug, called Type C, already exists, but this version is less than half the size of even that. It may seem like halving an already small plug standard isn't hugely significant, but given HDMI's apparent trajectory toward use in mobile phones and portable devices, hitting that comfortable Micro USB size might be just enough to convince hardware designers that adding an extra A/V port—dedicated, mind you—to their devices isn't such a terrible prospect. [Tech-On]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5245315&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Monoprice Mini DisplayPort-to-HDMI Adapter Hands-On: HD iTunes Now Plays On TVs]]> Monoprice sent us their $14 Mini DisplayPort-to-HDMI adapter, and we tested it with some protected content to see if it solved one of the new MacBook's biggest monitor compatibility problems. Sure enough, it did.

Apple is still to blame for not adopting HDMI, but at least this solution is somewhat helpful. See, most run-of-the-mill flat-panel TVs are HDCP compliant, but a lot of monitors are not. So, when you have the adapter, there is suddenly a massive population of screens that you can use that you otherwise cannot.

There are some things to keep in mind with this adapter:

1. It's only going to give you video output—you will have to find another way to route your audio from your new MacBook or MacBook Pro.

2. Even though the HDMI jack allows you to connect to a bunch of TVs that can handle HDCP, it doesn't mean you can get around HDCP. When we tried to watch the same movie using the other adapter, a Mini DP-to-DVI, on an older monitor, we were told we were not allowed:


Bottom line: If you own a MacBook or MacBook Pro, and you have iTunes video content you want to watch on a flat-panel TV, you had better get one of these. Maybe one day Apple will learn that HDMI isn't inherently evil, and all these adapters won't be necessary. [Monoprice]


]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5187481&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[iTunes HD Movies Won't Play on Older Non-HDCP Monitors]]> If you dropped $20 on an HD movie from iTunes since they came out yesterday, but have a newer Mac and an older external display, you might not be able to watch it.

That's because iTunes HD movies require that you have an HDCP-compliant external display. High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection is designed to prevent video from being copied as it moves across digital video interfaces. So, as iLounge points out, if you're using a Cinema Display older than Apple's 24-inch LED model (or any older DVI or VGA monitor, basically), you're screwed if you have it hooked up to a newer, HDCP-loving Mac. You just get a black box where the video should be.

It's not the first time HDCP has caused iTunes-related pain. When Apple first started rolling HDCP, they even applied the protections to standard definition content, so a whole bunch of people found out they couldn't play new movies they bought, so Apple wound up pulling back on SD, and everyone forgot about it until yesterday, when you could finally buy HD movies.

One solution iLounge proffers is to transfer the file to one of your older iTunes authorized computers, since Apple doesn't pull the HDCP mojo on them. The other is to play the movie in standard def mode—then it'll play on your monitor, but in crappy standard def. Of course, the irony is, if they just supported HDMI like every other computer company in the world, there'd be more than one external monitor you could use, since HDMI supports HDCP natively. All together now: HDCP sucks. [iLounge]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5177075&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Patch Coming for New Xbox Experience Dead Audio]]> If you've been missing out on SFII Turbo HD Remix's amazing soundtrack because you're being hit by the New Xbox Experience's audio-killing HDMI bug, don't worry, Microsoft says a patch is coming.

Apparently, the problem comes from a new HDCP protocol (a DRM thing baked into HDMI) that some older integrated sound systems can't deal with. Yay, another reason DRM sucks. In the meantime, you can either try that lame temporary fix by pulling out the hard drive and reinserting it when you're already in the dashboard, or you can use analog audio.

No word on when this patch is coming unfortunately. [Shack News via Ars]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100845&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[HDCP Restrictions Rolled Back on New MacBooks]]> One part of the new MacBook experience that didn't exactly seem like much of an upgrade was the addition of HDCP for the new DisplayPort video connector, which left users unable to watch iTunes DRMed video content—HD or SD—on non-HDCP compliant external displays. This morning Apple released an update to ease the pain: protected SD content will now play on older DVI and VGA-connected displays. It's a step in the right direction, but the real mistake here probably wasn't including SD content under the HDCP umbrella—it was cramming the DRM tech into the laptops in the first place. [MacRumors]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5099087&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[New MacBooks Have HDCP, Gives iTunes Purchases Less Freedom]]> High Definition Content Protection—the annoying DRM-y thing that's supposed to stop people from copying hi-def stuff as it travels over a card-display connector— has apparently, and unfortunately, come to Apple's MacBooks. HDCP is now included on new MacBooks to protect iTunes Store media, though it seems that only some of the content is actually HDCP-aware. A high school teacher was unable to play Hellboy 2 on his classroom's projector with his new aluminum MacBook, but other purchased media (such as Stargate: Continuum and Heroes episodes) worked just fine. Perfect. Because copyright protection is all about inconveniencing those who actually bought their stuff legally? [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5091627&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Xbox 360 Netflix HD Won't Work On Non-HDCP Digital Connections, But Component Works Fine]]> Microsoft and Netflix are requiring that users of their swell little HD streaming service are connected to HDCP-compatible display. This potentially limits access for people who connect to older LCD screens via DVI. UPDATE: It should be noted, however, that component cables work fine in our testing. From what we can tell, the problem is isolated to digital connections only. [Format War Central]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5070851&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tributaries HXC5 Sends HDMI up to 164-feet "Virtually Loss Free"]]> The HXC5 HDMI-over-CAT-5 system is being billed as a simple "plug and play" solution for sending HDMI signals over large distances —164 feet (50 meters) to be exact. The manufacturer also claims that this signal is "virtually loss free." The device utilizes balanced/unbalanced signal processing to ensure full hi-def signal integrity for all video formats up to and including 1080p and it is HDMI v1.2 / HDCP compliant.

The HXC5 requires a double-run of standard CAT5/5E/6 network cabling and it is packaged as a complete, ready-to-connect system —including a compact "balun" transmitter and receiver. Could definitely be a valuable problem-solving tool for anyone setting up a serious home theater. Available now for $600. [Tributaries]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324576&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ATI R600 Trounces Nvidia G8x with HDCP/HDMI Link]]> The new ATI R600 graphics card has a leg up on the Nvidia G8x: a built-in sound card that can send audio directly out over a HDCP/HDMI link. The Nvidia, due to a lack of onboard sound, can't do full HD surround sound on Vista.

The G8x requires an external cable to connect the sound chip to the GPU, which is a crime so grave that it means any computer manufactures who do it can't put a Vista Ready sticker on the front of the box. Seriously, Nvidia? You put out your flagship graphics card and it's not Vista-ready? That's damn near inexcusable. One's just got to hope they'll learn from this debacle and fix their mistakes with the next generation of cards.

The Inquirer [via Ubergizmo]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=250382&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Lindy Premium Gold HDMI Cables: There's a Bridge I Want To Sell You, Too]]>

Lindy is the latest company that's trying to convince consumers that gold-tipped, super-dee-dooper cables will not only deliver better video and audio quality, but they'll also cure your baldness, improve your skin complexion and give you the physique of an Ancient Greek statue. Their Premium Gold HDMI cables feature gold-plated connectors (of course, they're rubbish for the most part, especially over the short distances that most consumers run their myriad cables), triple shielding and RE-BLOK, which is supposed to reduce interference.

These premium cables aren't cheap, either: the smallest, 1.6 feet, cost around $101 while the longest, around 50 feet, cost just over $260. Then again, price gouging in the HDMI cable world is fairly common, as pointed out by our very own Charlie a few months ago.

But hey, buying gold-plated cables helps save the environment.

Product Page [Lidy via Crowdedbrain]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=201743&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Buffalo 19-Inch Widescreen Display]]> The oddly-named Buffalo is set to release the FTD-W924ADSR/SV (yeah, sorry), a 19-inch widescreen LCD with a 16:10 aspect ratio. Yes, 16:10, or 1,440x900-pixel resolution. Other stats include a contrast ratio of 800:1 and a 5ms response time. One of the big questions is whether or not the display supports HDCP, but seeing as though Sony buckled and won't cripple their Blu-ray titles on non-HDCP monitors, it's not quite as big a deal as it could have been.

Look for Buffalo's monitor by mid-month in Japan for an "open price." How thoughtful of Buffalo.

Product Page (in Japanese) [Buffalo via Akihabara News]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=193087&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tul PowerColor X1600 Graphics Card, Now With HDMI]]> No, perhaps Tul isn't the first company to offer a graphics card with onboard HDMI (I seem to remember an earlier Sapphire card), but the more cards with HDMI support the merrier. Unfortunately, the PowerColor X1600 will also support HDCP copy protection. It's not unfortunate that it supports the copy protection, but unfortunate that Hollywood's old men in suits got their way.

A 500MHz core sits at the heart of the GPU while 256MB of GDDR 3 RAM eagerly await all those high resolution textures you throw at it. ATI's Avivo technology helps render HD content in all its full glory.

The CrossFire-compatible PowerColor X1600 is set to ship sometime next week, though Tul doesn't want to reveal its price just yet. Usually, that means it's very, very affordable.

Product Page [Tul via The Register]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=188926&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sapphire Radeon X1600Pro with HDMI Port]]> Although we've seen these floating around in the wild, SapphireTech has now officially announced the availability of its Sapphire Radeon X1600Pro graphics card. What's so unusual about it? Well, well, looky there—it's an HDMI port on its business end instead of the usual DVI. The 256MB card has SP/DIF coaxial digital audio, too, and the digital audio can also be passed through that HDMI port.

Competitor nVidia told us graphics cards like this were coming, but this is the first we've seen with such a port, well-suited for home theater use because it's HDCP (High bandwidth Digital Copy Protection) compliant. Next up with a card like this will be nVidia, at least that's what they told us a couple of weeks ago.

Press Release [Sapphire, Inc.]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=184214&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gateway's New Vista Ready HDCP 19-inch LCD]]> gateway19.jpgThe new Gateway FPD1975W 19-inch LCD has a few things going for it. First, the relatively reasonable price of $299.99. Second, it supports HDCP-over-DVI, along with VGA and DVI, and is Vista ready. Third, there's an optional $70 height-adjustable stand with a four-port USB 2.0 hub and a $40 speaker bar with dual headphones.

Actually that last one isn't so much going in your favor as it is Gateway's, seeing as you have to spend extra cash on something that comes standard on Dell's 1907 19-inch monitors. This widescreen monitor goes up to 1440x900, so that means it does not support 1080p. But that's probably expected from a monitor under 300 bones.

Product page [Gateway via Digital Trends]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=181108&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Viewsonic Rolls Out 'Future-Proof' LCD TVs]]> Viewsonic has announced two LCD TVs that are being labeled as future-proof, but they seem to lack the key ingredient of the future of home entertainment: 1080p. They will be offering up the 27-inch N2751w and the 32-inch N3251w in their future-proof line. They have an HDMI connection, 16:9 aspect ratios and support HDCP copy protection—HDMI and HDCP are probably the features that the future proofing is referring to. Fortunately these TVs have a very budget-friendly price that match their other budget-friendly specs—8ms response time, 1,000:1 contrast ratio and boatload of inputs. Prices will start at $800 for the 27-inch model and $1,000 for the 32-inch model.

N2751w and N3251w [Viewsonic via Digital Trends]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=178477&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Abit IL-80MV: First HDMI-Equipped Motherboard]]> Here's a quick peek into the near future, where Universal Abit is first up with an HDMI-equipped motherboard. The Abit IL-80MV also supports Intel's newest Core 2 Duo chips, and has dual SATA 3.0Gbps second ports, FireWire and optical audio in and out. The board is now in the process of getting AACS certification from Silicon Image, so we can expect the HDMI-out to support copy-protected (HDCP) signals.

Now if they would just bring on the CableCard support (or even better, CableCard 2.0 if it's ever finished), this might make a good foundation for pretty good Vista-supporting digital video recorder. Turns out the near-future is pretty soon, with company insiders saying we'll be seeing retail availability next month, at an as-yet-undetermined price.


Universal Abit First Out the Door With HDMI Motherboard
[Daily Tech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=173085&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Acer Aspire 9800 to be Second Laptop to Eventually Have an HD DVD Drive]]> Acer took its place in line behind Toshiba to say it will release an HD DVD-packing laptop, the Aspire 9800. This is going to be one unusual notebook, with a whopping 20.1-inch 1680x1050 LCD. The thing is loaded for video of all types, including a 1.3-megapixel webcam, and both analog and digital TV tuners feeding that big display. It's also HDCP compliant, with a DVI port in the back to hook up to an HDTV. Acer hedged on that HD DVD drive, though, mentioning that the laptop will initially ship in May with a DVD burner, and wouldn't say when the HD DVD drive would be a part of the spec list.

Although it's great the notebook will have such a huge screen, we're puzzled at that oddball 1680x1050 resolution, frustratingly short of 1080p which will eventually be the lingua franca of HD DVD. And, at that big screen size, anything short of 1920x1200 is not what we would call state-of-the-art. Oh, well. Can't have it all.

Acer unveils world's second HD DVD laptop [Reg Hardware]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165793&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Universal Nixes ICT Image Degradation Scheme, For Now]]> Universal says it won't use that obnoxious ICT (Image Constraint Token) for any of its offerings, at least not yet. This could sound the death knell of the scheme where monitors that don't support HDCP (copy protection) would only receive a standard-definition image from Blu-ray or HD DVD playback.

This follows the lead of Sony, Paramount, Disney and 20th Century Fox, all of whom have said they wouldn't be initially using ICT. According to a BusinessWeek report, Warner Bros. stands alone as the only film studio that's announced plans to use the hated copy protection scheme, but only on some of its titles.

Well, well. It looks like the studio suits are finally starting to think about how these products will be used, loathing the day when a consumer gets the player home, pops in his first HD disk and notices that it doesn't look any better than garden-variety DVD. Good thinking, guys. Why didn't you think of this earlier?

Universal opts not to downscale HD content; ICT dead on arrival? [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=163475&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sony Wont Downconvert Blu-ray HD on Old HDTVs]]> Here s one less worry for those of us looking forward to Blu-ray: Sony's Don Eklund, Senior Vice President for Advanced Technologies, said that all of Sony's Blu-ray disks will be free of that digital flag that tells the player to down-rez the HD signal if there's no HDMI cable present. Called the "image constraint token," it threatens to lower the resolution to standard-definition quality if users try to output video in component format.

This means that HDTVs that aren't equipped with the HDCP copy protection will still be able to play the new discs. Eklund said that Sony was more concerned about piracy of the digital HDTV signal rather than analog signals coming through component cables. Sounds like the Sony we know and love is getting itself a clue. Now let's see if the HD DVD disk peddlers will follow suit.

Blu-ray to Debut May 23 [Sound and Vision]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=160358&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[HDCP-Compliant Graphics Cards Jumped the Gun]]> ati_nvidia.jpgThere s bad news about ATI and NVIDIA graphics cards and their alleged "support" for high-bandwidth digital content protection (HDCP), that wrench in the works that will keep you from watching high-definition content on a monitor unless both card and display have this special juju.

If you buy a graphics card today, even if it says it supports HDCP, it won't. It's total bullshit. That's because HDCP itself is a moving target and still hasn't been finalized.

Worse, there's no way a graphics card can be retrofitted for HDCP, because it's not a software or firmware fix—HDCP has to be supported by adding special encryption codes during the manufacturing process. But the cardmeisters will probably fix this problem as the HDCP spec is finalized. So if you buy a graphics card now, you're SOL if you want to watch high-rez HD content on a computer monitor.

It looks like ATI and NVIDIA are clinging to that old adage: Ready, Fire, Aim.

The truth behind HDCP and video card support

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155108&view=rss&microfeed=true