What would LHer's recommend in terms of the best reliability 1TB drives for a NAS? Is that size in the sweet spot at this point? Am I going to significantly decrease reliability using 2TB drives? #diy
@AmphetamineCrown: The Western Digital Caviar Black drives are by far the most reliable. [www.newegg.com]
In fact, I just ordered two of these yesterday!
Judging from current trends, virtually all of the 2TB drives currently out have pretty bad reliability track records. I had considered them, too, but I don't want to waste money on them.
AmphetamineCrown promoted this comment
Edited by David Frederick Becker at 11/07/09 1:15 PM
David Frederick Becker was starred
David Frederick Becker was unstarred
@AmphetamineCrown: If you're primary goal is the reliability of an individual drive and you're willing to pay the premium an "enterprise" drive like the Barracuda ES.2 or something from the newer Constellation line is going to give you the best reliability, especially if you plan on running 24/7.
If cost is more of a factor, you might consider 1.5TB drives. Seagate (Barracuda LP), WD (Caviar Green), and Samsung (Eco Green F2) all have low-spindle-speed 1.5TB drives. Put them in a RAID 5 or RAID 6 configuration for reliability, utilize the 3-year warranty if needed, and you'll be fine.
I personally just put together a NAS with 6 1.5 TB Barracuda LPs in a RAID 6 running the Openfiler NAS software and its been running like a champ. 70MB/s over gigabit ethernet without jumbo frames enabled. #diy
@brisketboy: @David Frederick Becker: I've actually been using the Barracuda ES.2s in my 6 drive ReadyNAS. It is about a year old, and I replaced one a couple months ago when the monitoring software started detecting errors. Now I'm starting to see errors on two other drives. As easy as they are to replace, I'm not really liking the concept of running through 3 drives a year.
Maybe I'll try the Caviar black drives and see how they do. Seems like I'm going to develop quite the history with replacing drives. #diy
@chaos215bar2000: it's about the platter spin speed, not the density of data. this is a 5400 rpm drive, which is common but slowish. many people prefer a 7200 rpm unit.
@giusepe: That's it! I don't care about anyone else, I'm calling them tits from now on. Then, next time I'm having a geek-chat with my husband, I can be all, "Cool, that [drive/laptop/tower] sounds interesting - how many tits has it got?"
@GitEmSteveDave_ForgivesChris4ThePizza: I also found it extraordinary that they knew where the whistle was and what it did, considering none of them had played the game before.
01:10 PM
01:14 PM
In fact, I just ordered two of these yesterday!
Judging from current trends, virtually all of the 2TB drives currently out have pretty bad reliability track records. I had considered them, too, but I don't want to waste money on them.
01:28 PM
If cost is more of a factor, you might consider 1.5TB drives. Seagate (Barracuda LP), WD (Caviar Green), and Samsung (Eco Green F2) all have low-spindle-speed 1.5TB drives. Put them in a RAID 5 or RAID 6 configuration for reliability, utilize the 3-year warranty if needed, and you'll be fine.
I personally just put together a NAS with 6 1.5 TB Barracuda LPs in a RAID 6 running the Openfiler NAS software and its been running like a champ. 70MB/s over gigabit ethernet without jumbo frames enabled. #diy
02:17 PM
Maybe I'll try the Caviar black drives and see how they do. Seems like I'm going to develop quite the history with replacing drives. #diy
10/18/09
10/18/09
10/18/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
"whats the difference between tub and gig" into google, they may find themselves looking at a tub girl. And that would always be on my mind
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/10/09
10/07/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
[www.retrousb.com]
Parallel is easy to do but you'll need that kit to do USB.
09/27/09
09/27/09
"/;__;\"~~~(¯__¯ ) There there, it's ok, my brother, at lesat SMB3 went out in style for another...
09/27/09
09/27/09
I actually tried their games in an NES emulator a few months ago, and the Angry Video Game Nerd was right. They were terrible.
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09