Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
The only perpetuation of stereotype comes from the haughty twits who will sit in front of their computer and make assumptions about the character of the individuals in the video simply because they would not choose to brandish a firearm themselves.
But if you are putting this on a TV that is not mounted on the wall, you can go much cheaper than this. I bought a $40 VESA mount for a Mac Mini and have that attached to the back of a TV.
I'm sure that you could make a VESA mount for a Dell Zino and do the same thing, since the Zino is a little more capable as an HTPC. Or maybe someone will make a VESA mount for it so you don't have to.
You forgot the to add that a Blue-Ray drive is available, and when you think about it that takes almost 170 dollars OFF the price...so that $15,000 dollar one I configured didn't seem so crazy after all
@masonsturtle: plasma as of now, have better picture. lets say you had both tvs side by side, then you had a cnn headline going across the screen on both of them. The plasma one would stay very crisp, the LCD would get blurred. So during a fast action sequence in a movie, the video stays crisp on the plasma but it can get blurry on the LCD. Realisticly, you cant notice it unless you compare it side by side, even then, its not that bad.
@NotSoSiniSter: This is very true. My argument FOR 60hz TVs is that motion blur is a naturally occurring thing. When things start to look too crisp, like a movie like Spider Man for instance, it begins to look fake. It can make even live action begin to look like CGI.
I prefer blurriness and fuzz, because that's what real life looks like. Maybe it's because I have terrible vision and have to wear glasses- but it's all I know!
@Ryan_Long: I thought that way at first, but I made myself enable the 120Hz on my TV for a while. I got used to it, now I like it. When I watch other peoples' TVs, I don't miss it much, but when I watch mind I don't mind the effect and it does make things crisper. At first I thought it was surreal or too crisp / fake looking. My mind started processing it differently over time and now I see it more like I am looking through a window at the scene instead of looking through what a camera recorded.
@Ryan_Long: i'm kind of conflicted when it comes to 60hz and 120hz. for one, i like the fact that it makes the picture look less blurry and sharper, but the demos at best buy just downright disgust me. it looks way too fake. sometimes it doesn't, so i'd have to test the tv first. the thing i like about 60hz TV's is that they're cheaper lol.
@Branhower: Sure, I absolutely agree. Accurate color reproduction is far more important than going beyond 120Hz. There is a slight difference at 240Hz and even smaller diminishing returns the higher you go.
Accurate / true black level is more important too.
I was trying to say that 120Hz over 60Hz is hard to swallow at first because there is a lot of difference and it looks too real, but at least for me I found that I got used to it and rather like it now. I don't dislike TVs that don't have it, but it just a nice thing to have now that I am used to it.
@paulrules: That is the standard refresh rate for plasma nothing special there. The prices are good for LCD, but they are like that because they are 60Hz, 120Hz is now the standard medium to shoot for to getting an LCD. Feel free to enjoy laughing at those getting 240Hz,
For the record, the gentleman with the Sharper jersey *cough*, skull tattoo, and jean shorts over pajama bottoms is...amazing. Takes a special man to pull off a look like that.
"Eh they commin out da woodworks...".
This is a perfect example of why we shouldn't teach apes to use technology. Dem donts know how to use'em, aeu'ah.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
I'm sure that you could make a VESA mount for a Dell Zino and do the same thing, since the Zino is a little more capable as an HTPC. Or maybe someone will make a VESA mount for it so you don't have to.
12/13/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
I prefer blurriness and fuzz, because that's what real life looks like. Maybe it's because I have terrible vision and have to wear glasses- but it's all I know!
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
Not sure if that makes sense to you.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
Accurate / true black level is more important too.
I was trying to say that 120Hz over 60Hz is hard to swallow at first because there is a lot of difference and it looks too real, but at least for me I found that I got used to it and rather like it now. I don't dislike TVs that don't have it, but it just a nice thing to have now that I am used to it.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/11/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
This is a perfect example of why we shouldn't teach apes to use technology. Dem donts know how to use'em, aeu'ah.
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09