• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#highdynamicrange

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 7:18 AM
Tue Dec 1
61 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #highdynamicrange more →

    How To: Create Stunningly Realistic High Dynamic Range Photographs

    Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo

    SIM2, Dolby's High Dynamic Range TV: For Quality A-Team Viewing

    HDR Photography Explained: Learn the Secrets of the Masters
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of plastikwaren plastikwaren
    03/16/09

    In reply to How To: Create Stunningly Realistic High Dynamic Range Photographs
    If I were to take one shot in RAW format, wouldn't I be able to create the necessary three different exposures out of the one shot, making the necessary exposure adjustments on the computer?
     Reply
    plastikwaren was starred plastikwaren was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    03/16/09

    @plastikwaren: Yes, but you won't get the same four-stop range of bracketing multiple shots.
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of ChasityKaplooyi ChasityKaplooyi
    03/15/09

    In reply to How To: Create Stunningly Realistic High Dynamic Range Photographs
    Some of us like the clown vomit, btw. (Great metaphor, JM.) The surreal versus the documentary photo, versus the "realistic" (but adjusted) photo are all matters of taste. And only that. There is no rule for creating "right" images. Only successful or failed attempts at achieving a photographer's intentions. And ultimately, execution, not intention, is the measure of all things. So stop hating on the clowns. The rodeo is big enough for us all.
     Reply
    ChasityKaplooyi was starred ChasityKaplooyi was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    03/16/09

    @ChasityKaplooyi: Yep, agree with you! Said that about 100 times in the post :) They're your photos, do what you want with them! Amen!
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of e0ytk e0ytk
    03/14/09

    In reply to How To: Create Stunningly Realistic High Dynamic Range Photographs
    Great tips guys. I've been using one of the recommended camera's for getting HDR, the Pentax K10. I take 5 exposures at 2 stop differences and I created a really crappy one in my living room in a matter of minutes.


    [img.photobucket.com] Photos/comparison.jpg


    But outside and at night or at dusk it'll really be evident and look amazing. Great article.

     Reply
    e0ytk was starred e0ytk was unstarred
    Image of balls187 balls187
    03/14/09

    HDR/Tone Mapping can't save a boring shot.
     Reply
    balls187 was starred balls187 was unstarred
    Image of viatorci viatorci
    03/14/09

    @e0ytk: Here ya go: [img.photobucket.com]


    I think this will work too:

     Reply
    viatorci was starred viatorci was unstarred
    Image of e0ytk e0ytk
    03/14/09

    @viatorci: Thanks :)


    @balls187: Well very true but I believe I already stated this wasn't a great shot, it was merely a sample of it working on small scale in any home.

     Reply
    e0ytk was starred e0ytk was unstarred
    Image of balls187 balls187
    03/16/09

    @e0ytk: Sorry e0ytk. That comment was misdirected to you by Gawkers busted commenting system. I did not mean to insult your photography. That was suppose to be a general comment to the article.


    Again, I apologize.

     Reply
    balls187 was starred balls187 was unstarred
    Image of IN THE FACE! IN THE FACE!
    03/14/09

    In reply to How To: Create Stunningly Realistic High Dynamic Range Photographs
    Always wondered how this was done. Thnx!
     Reply
    IN THE FACE! was starred IN THE FACE! was unstarred
    Image of balls187 balls187
    02/23/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo
    Just a minor nitpick, the images are HDR; they're regular images that have been tone-mapped from HDR images.


    True HDR images can't be displayed on any current monitors.

     Reply
    balls187 was starred balls187 was unstarred
    Image of matthorn matthorn
    02/19/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo
    Even if most high dynamic range photos on Flickr make you want to barf.


    really? I found them to be brillinaly refreshing as if you had merged a poet and photgrapher together and they were seeing the images through the eyes of vampire.

     Reply
    matthorn was starred matthorn was unstarred
    Image of balls187 balls187
    02/23/09

    @matthorn: on lsd.
     Reply
    balls187 was starred balls187 was unstarred
    Image of kaylix kaylix
    02/19/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo
    "horrifically gaudy results"? Really??

    I thought those shots were very interesting...
     Reply
    kaylix was starred kaylix was unstarred
    Image of John Mahoney John Mahoney
    02/19/09

    @kaylix: Yeah they're not all bad, but a LOT of them are.
     Reply
    John Mahoney was starred John Mahoney was unstarred
    Image of SegamanXero SegamanXero
    02/19/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo
    maybe I will finally replace my Minolta DiMAGE F300 with this? from what I've seen so far HDR looks mighty pretty in pictures!
     Reply
    SegamanXero was starred SegamanXero was unstarred
    Image of MrBlahBlah MrBlahBlah
    02/19/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo
    There is a fugifilm that does an HDR-like thing, but just with one shot (it relies on some magic with the sensor). It's not out yet, but its coming out.
     Reply
    MrBlahBlah was starred MrBlahBlah was unstarred
    Image of dMek dMek
    02/19/09

    In reply to Ricoh CX1 Point and Shoot Does In-Camera High Dynamic Range, 120fps Slow-Mo
    This is more of a dynamic range extension than true HDR. The two shots are most likely compared, combined extra shadow and highlight detail to extend the dynamic range of the exposure.
     Reply
    dMek was starred dMek was unstarred
    Image of fussball fussball
    02/19/09

    @dMek: perhaps I take too literal an interpretation of HDR-- but "dynamic range extension" and "high dynamic range" seem pretty much like the same thing :) granted, you can push HDR to the ridiculous levels that some do on flickr, but it is more tastefully used for 'range extension' as you call it.
     Reply
    fussball was starred fussball was unstarred
    Image of balls187 balls187
    02/23/09

    @fussball: it's not the HDR process that looks like shit; its the tone-mapping that produces the crap, fake looking crap you see.
     Reply
    balls187 was starred balls187 was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.