<![CDATA[Gizmodo: high-resolution]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: high-resolution]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/high-resolution http://gizmodo.com/tag/high-resolution <![CDATA[ Toshiba Rolls Out 22-Inch 3840x2400 Monitor ]]> Can you say WQUXGA? Toshiba can. According to a translated promo page, it built the 22" "super Kousei small LCD monitor" with a resolution of 3840x2400. That's 200 dots per inch! Toshiba admits, though, that the contrast ratio is 300:1, pretty bad even if you don't believe in contrast-ratio reporting. In Japan, MSRP for this sucker is 2,079,000 Yen (about $18,000). The XP-compatible PCI card required to run it will set you back another 312,900 Yen ($2,700). Oddly enough, in our search for an image, we found this reportedly WQUXGA monitor by ADTX, selling for the mysteriously low price of 198,000 Yen ($1,700)—wonder what the contrast ratio is on that. [Toshiba via Akihabara News; Source image from Matrox]

]]>
Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:49:47 EDT Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318115&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ UCSD Engineers Build Highest Resolution Display in the World ]]> Imagine how good Jessica Alba would look on a display 100 times the quality of an HDTV? Engineers at the University of California in San Diego have built the world's highest-resolution computer display which, at 220 mega-pixels, is 100 more higher than a high definition TV. The 55-panel display is linked through a fiber optic Ethernet cable to a 50-panel high-resolution display in UC Irvine (the previous mega-pixel record-holder at 200) to form the "Highly Interactive Parallelized Display Space" or HIPerSpace or just, "the nerdiest name ever."

The displays are available to teams of scientists and engineers working in the Earth sciences, biomedical engineering, genomics, climate prediction, brain imaging and, yes, going for the easy joke here — porn. The high-resolution displays allow the researchers to take in the broad view of images as well as the detailed inner-workings — something we can't wait to do with our favorite celebrity's face. [InformationWeek]

]]>
Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:49:01 EDT ybaranovsky http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293392&view=rss&microfeed=true