Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
This is an amazing step forward in display screen technology: Instead of TV's falling on kids to kill them, they will be razor thin and chop them in half instead.
I personally think that this will be good eventually. Many people already have 120Hz TVs and more and more people are buying blu-ray players. Where it may stall is that I don't think people will buy new TVs and new Blu-ray players just for 3D. I would however buy a new TV for 3D games and I already have a PS3 so I'm covered for 3D blu-ray.
Am I the only one that's not one inch moved by this 3D shenanigans, and actually frows every time a decent flick is released in 3D?
I'm not wearing another pair of glasses over my prescription glasses, and I'm not watching another 3D movie or buying a 3D TV until they figure out how to do this without glasses.
P.S.: don't tell me to wear contacts. I would hate those 3D glasses even if I had perfect eyesight.
@Pazu: Yeah, but it's neat if it's optional like this. I'd normally do without, but sometimes it'd be fun to put on the glasses and watch hobbits run around the living room.
And I could swear there were some very expensive no-glasses sets shown here on Giz. But the viewing angle was like 2°.
Found: [gizmodo.com] . There's a video somewhere showing a live demo, too. The perspective came through a little on the camera. But $25k!
03:09 PM
03:10 PM
03:12 PM
01:31 PM
01:08 PM
What's next? A .5mm 60" OLED screen lighter than air?
They'll soon have to make some lead frames to make those feel less cheap...
11:48 AM
11:00 AM
10:34 AM
10:36 AM
11:26 AM
Too bad there's probably an external box for all the electronics.
01:14 PM
01:16 PM
But you'll have to tie it to something so it won't go flying out the window.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
Fad.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
I'm not wearing another pair of glasses over my prescription glasses, and I'm not watching another 3D movie or buying a 3D TV until they figure out how to do this without glasses.
P.S.: don't tell me to wear contacts. I would hate those 3D glasses even if I had perfect eyesight.
12/17/09
And I could swear there were some very expensive no-glasses sets shown here on Giz. But the viewing angle was like 2°.
Found: [gizmodo.com] . There's a video somewhere showing a live demo, too. The perspective came through a little on the camera. But $25k!
12/17/09