Save us, Government, save us! We don't like the terms of our voluntary contracts any more, please hold a gun to their heads! Never mind that bandwidth costs money, we want it and we want you to force them to give it to us on our behalf! Oh glorious Government, hallowed be thy name! For it is you, and only you, that can decide better than we what is best for us! It is you who litigates our problems away at others expense!
@nutbastard: The real irony here is that people's limited broadband choices are probably caused directly by municipal monopolies granted to their local cable and telephone providers.
I know this is somewhat off topic, but I think AT&T has found another way to limit at least part of your downloads. Sometime around 7/15/09 they are eliminating access to usenet.
@@iqlusion: ahhh, stray comments. Maybe Giz should add some type of "Replying to:" field so you know it is actually going to reply to a comment thread and not end up afloat like the one above :-\
@Hiphopopotamus: Great idea, except the fact that a lot of people have no choice. If i want Internet at my house, i get ATT DSL or i pay 500/MO for a T1, THOSE ARE MY OPTIONS.
@admoseremic: Jesus, you people seem to be everywhere these days.
I guess you also don't like the military/police protecting you, the FDA making sure your food doesn't have excess amounts of feces in it, the EPA making sure your water is clean, or OSHA making sure you don't fall in a meat grinder either, eh?
Considering how a major corporation sees me (as just a line on a balance sheet somewhere), I bloody well WELCOME additional government involvement in my life.
If you don't like it, move to Somalia. Go ahead, move. I'll even buy your farking plane ticket.
@admoseremic: Meh. I have no preference between being oppressed by the government or by telecommunications cartels. Taking it in the ass is painful no matter who is on the other end.
Of course, this regulation, without price caps, leaves open the possibility of a "creative response". For instance, companies might just increase prices to compensate for having no caps or volume- based fees. Consumers could get screwed either way.
@Hello Mister Walrus: the same group of people determining what's fair about capping data usage is the same group of people that determine who is allowed to provide cable service to your region... so you're getting screwed by the same people either way.
@Hiphopopotamus: Hmm. That's a good point. Furthermore, these same people who are screwing me are catering to the agenda of their campaign contributors, who are the people who would be screwing me in the alternative scenario. So, it looks like it's more of a "gang-screwing".
@mdmadph: So that when the government does pass new regulations and taxes, the costs are passed on to you and those less economically fortunate than you?
Yeah, punish the poor! Hurrah!
FDA? EPA? Wow. Because, you know, they have fantastic track records and are so effective at what they do.
Yeah, more government involvement! Yeah, more recessions! Who doesn't love how banks and healthcare, some of the most regulated sectors of the economy, are doing!
@rimshot515: Interestingly, people are blaming the recession on a lack of regulation in the financial industry (though I suppose who to blame doesn't really matter at this point). It's an interesting problem - regulation causes economic distortions, but on the other hand, the population is collectively stupid, resulting in us causing bubbles that burst and erase years of growth. We need some degree of economic regulation - it's just really difficult to determine how much, and how it should be applied correctly.
FDA = Underfunded, understaffed, chronyism and admin appointees that are industry insiders and have an agenda contrary to its purpose.
EPA = Again; underfunded, understaffed, chronyism and admin appointees that are industry insiders and have an agenda contrary to its purpose.
Banking: HUGE deregulation at the end of 2000 (thanks Clinton!) and lack of oversight/regulation lead to the collapse.
Your statement concerning healthcare seems to blur the insurance industry and healthcare providers together.
Healthcare providers are not the problem, the insurance industry who's promary concern is profits is the problem.
You're just stringing together random concepts you might have heard any attributing them to other things you think might be related. It's utter nonsense.
@rimshot515: You probably cant even comprehend with your little repub brain how many times the FDA has probably saved your life. Just think for 1 fucking second about the peanut thing, sure they missed that, but how many things have they NOT missed, that has prevented you from death, penis loss, and all forms of cancer.
@mdmadph: While I agree that many government agencies are good and necessary, I also believe that there are many agencies and services and laws that are not necessary and even damaging to businesses and people. A bill that puts these type of trivial limits and laws on a corporation just because a bunch of people don't like the way the business is run lies on the side of unnecessary and damaging in my opinion.
@admoseremic: How is preventing data caps a bad thing here though? It's an unfair practice caused by the fact that the industry literally has zero competition. It's not due to actual issues providing said bandwidth at all.
I'm all for promoting business, but when the technology sector is trying to push forward and create new exciting ways to use said technology is being stifled by greedy ISP's, I have no issue with the government stepping in and slapping their wrists because they frankly deserve it.
We've come far enough that the digital life should be progressing, not regressing. With all of these ridiculous data caps in place, just for starters, ideas like streaming Netflix are getting hurt. How is this smart business at all?
RuBBa_cHiKiN: The real question is can it fit in the Batmobile? was starred
RuBBa_cHiKiN: The real question is can it fit in the Batmobile? was unstarred
@LeanderSnookie: Data caps alone might be bad because the companies will try to recoup profits from other areas, like cutting other services or just charging higher prices. In the long run, it might be more damaging to technological development. Any effective regulation must account for all these possibilities.
dude, how pathetically helpless are you that in your mind, a world without the FDA means drinking sewer water?
Are you really so paralyzingly frightened of the world that it turns nightmarish the second there isn't a mother figure making sure your cocoa isn't too hot?
Hunch - you've spent your whole life living in a large city.
"The Recession was nothing more than a side effect of Deregulation. "
By that argument, then, industry was in a perpetual recession before regulation. And that simply isn't true - the entire industrial revolution occurred with virtually zero regulation.
Had the recession not happened, Old Man Madoff would still be scamming people. Recessions are necessary every once in a while because they expose the bastards and topple towers built too high. The problem here is the government isn't letting the big ones fall, which means that this recession is going to be a long, drawn out bitch of a time with little benefit.
So long as it's data caps on what is sold as an "unlimited" plan. ISPs should be able to sell access by the GB, but they shouldn't be allowed to cap "unlimited" plans.
If the government wants there to be more competition, then put in plans to genuinely increase competition, don't create stupid laws that require companies to "justify" their prices, that's just going to end in pain for everyone.
Agreed, This shouldn't require additional legislation - it is covered under false advertising laws. I think the meaning of the word "unlimited" is fairly unambiguous - I mean, obviously one IS limited by hardware etc, but "unlimited" means 'without arbitrary additional limits imposed'.
See if your boss wants to pay you to make stupid YouTube videos. You may do it, but you're probably not dumb enough to send it to him, which is exactly what this idiot did.
As taxpayers, we provide her paycheck... shows how politicians feel about the people. Great use of time Mrs. Speaker, maybe you noticed the country going down the sh!thole while you were d!cking-off.
@FreshJulius: I guarantee you she wasn't the person actually making the video. Furthermore, I guarantee you it was a communications staffer tasked with things like updating her website, responding to constituent emails, etc. Hell, maybe it was even an unpaid intern. Lastly, that communications staffer / unpaid intern wouldn't have had anything to do with crafting policy that will stop the country from "going down the sh!thole" had they not spent some time making this video. In creating this video, no energy was taken away from doing anything important.
06/18/09
"Massa! Massa! The ISPs done capped our 'loads! And we slave folks is fixin to uncap them loads hyah! Oh, pray, Massa!"
06/18/09
06/18/09
(Note: Advertising 'unlimited' but imposing limits should be dealt with under false advertisement laws; no new legislation is required.)
06/18/09
Does this mean you are pro gun control?
06/18/09
I'm Libertarian - I oppose any kind of regulation or restriction of firearms.
Yes, that does mean that I believe that The People have a God-given right to own hand grenades and AK-47's.
06/18/09
Even better, the congressman's name is "Massa".
"Massa! Massa! The ISPs done capped our 'loads! And we slave folks is fixin to uncap them loads hyah! Oh, pray, Massa!"
06/18/09
06/19/09
Im all for removing government's power to play favorites.
06/18/09
06/18/09
...and then sometime around 7/16/09, a workaround will be hacked out and it'll be like nothing happened.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
So you would prefer to have someone you pay to change terms and limit your downloads?
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
oh stfu "i have no choice". you can choose to not have it. you won't die without it. you just WANT it.
06/18/09
06/18/09
I guess you also don't like the military/police protecting you, the FDA making sure your food doesn't have excess amounts of feces in it, the EPA making sure your water is clean, or OSHA making sure you don't fall in a meat grinder either, eh?
Considering how a major corporation sees me (as just a line on a balance sheet somewhere), I bloody well WELCOME additional government involvement in my life.
If you don't like it, move to Somalia. Go ahead, move. I'll even buy your farking plane ticket.
06/18/09
Of course, this regulation, without price caps, leaves open the possibility of a "creative response". For instance, companies might just increase prices to compensate for having no caps or volume- based fees. Consumers could get screwed either way.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
Yeah, punish the poor! Hurrah!
FDA? EPA? Wow. Because, you know, they have fantastic track records and are so effective at what they do.
Yeah, more government involvement! Yeah, more recessions! Who doesn't love how banks and healthcare, some of the most regulated sectors of the economy, are doing!
06/18/09
Just try and imagine a world WITHOUT them. I dare you.
I hope you like drinking sewer water.
06/18/09
You see, there's these things called "progressive taxes" -- oh, it's not like you're listening, anyway.
06/18/09
06/18/09
This isn't additional government involvement in your life.
@rimshot515:
FDA = Underfunded, understaffed, chronyism and admin appointees that are industry insiders and have an agenda contrary to its purpose.
EPA = Again; underfunded, understaffed, chronyism and admin appointees that are industry insiders and have an agenda contrary to its purpose.
Banking: HUGE deregulation at the end of 2000 (thanks Clinton!) and lack of oversight/regulation lead to the collapse.
Your statement concerning healthcare seems to blur the insurance industry and healthcare providers together.
Healthcare providers are not the problem, the insurance industry who's promary concern is profits is the problem.
You're just stringing together random concepts you might have heard any attributing them to other things you think might be related. It's utter nonsense.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
I'm all for promoting business, but when the technology sector is trying to push forward and create new exciting ways to use said technology is being stifled by greedy ISP's, I have no issue with the government stepping in and slapping their wrists because they frankly deserve it.
We've come far enough that the digital life should be progressing, not regressing. With all of these ridiculous data caps in place, just for starters, ideas like streaming Netflix are getting hurt. How is this smart business at all?
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/19/09
dude, how pathetically helpless are you that in your mind, a world without the FDA means drinking sewer water?
Are you really so paralyzingly frightened of the world that it turns nightmarish the second there isn't a mother figure making sure your cocoa isn't too hot?
Hunch - you've spent your whole life living in a large city.
06/19/09
"The Recession was nothing more than a side effect of Deregulation. "
By that argument, then, industry was in a perpetual recession before regulation. And that simply isn't true - the entire industrial revolution occurred with virtually zero regulation.
Had the recession not happened, Old Man Madoff would still be scamming people. Recessions are necessary every once in a while because they expose the bastards and topple towers built too high. The problem here is the government isn't letting the big ones fall, which means that this recession is going to be a long, drawn out bitch of a time with little benefit.
06/18/09
If the government wants there to be more competition, then put in plans to genuinely increase competition, don't create stupid laws that require companies to "justify" their prices, that's just going to end in pain for everyone.
06/18/09
Agreed, This shouldn't require additional legislation - it is covered under false advertising laws. I think the meaning of the word "unlimited" is fairly unambiguous - I mean, obviously one IS limited by hardware etc, but "unlimited" means 'without arbitrary additional limits imposed'.
01/14/09
awww sonofab!
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
Sure, the meme might be overplayed and overused, but A for effort.
Nancy Pelosi, if you read this, you are officially my favorite House Speaker of all time.
01/14/09
See if your boss wants to pay you to make stupid YouTube videos. You may do it, but you're probably not dumb enough to send it to him, which is exactly what this idiot did.
As taxpayers, we provide her paycheck... shows how politicians feel about the people. Great use of time Mrs. Speaker, maybe you noticed the country going down the sh!thole while you were d!cking-off.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09