Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #hpmediasmartserverex487 more → 
HP MediaSmart EX487 Server Has Remote MP3 Streaming, Mac Time Machine Compatibility
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
| posts about #hpmediasmartserverex487 more → |
HP MediaSmart EX487 Server Has Remote MP3 Streaming, Mac Time Machine Compatibility |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
12/29/08
12/29/08
12/29/08
12/29/08
Presently wondering about the ability to upgrade it to real RAID (5 preferably) and maintain all of the stock server functionality?
12/29/08
12/29/08
12/29/08
Aside from that.. 750TB?
WANT.
12/29/08
12/29/08
"Mea culpa"= some sort of English/journalism major? = I still can forget your review of the Indy whip = so this is like a Drobo for more $$$$$ with limited storage with all sorts of HP software to make your storage robot super HP friendly + an HP slave?
12/29/08
Lousy bitrate for streaming to a stereo system though.
12/29/08
PS- Quoted from text above "As far as availability and pricing goes, the updated MediaSmart Server will be available for order on January 5, with the 750 GB EX485 selling for $600, while the 1.5 TB EX487 costs about $750."
You do know how to read right?
12/29/08
12/29/08
12/29/08
And I hear the difference between 128 and 320Kbs, like I can tell my mom from my dad. 128Kbz is barely enough for background music, but if you use music professionally you stick to wav/flac. 320Kbs MP3 is pretty damn close to the original, I probably fail in hearing differences in 50% of material. The playback volume plays an important role because the higher the bitrate of MP3, the better transient response you get (more 'punch and detail' by sharper volume changes). We can judge the transient response better when played back on original volume (which is way louder than normal listening!)
12/29/08