Not so much the waiting and re-thinking. I do that with every phone that comes out.
Why this and hero? I'd think with hero you were looking for an android device and in either case there I'd wait to see the devices that VZW is offering. You either get a better device or the same device for cheaper. If its android you're waiting for why jump to win mo? #htctouchhd2ukusnovember9
@tande04: I'm looking for the bump in performance that the HD2 will have compared to the Hero. I'm familiar with Windows Mobile from the palm years and haven't had much for issues in the past. I'd rather stick with something that I'm familiar with and works than purchasing a Hero with sub par specs. Odd huh? #htctouchhd2ukusnovember9
Or if you want to wait even more you could wait for "rachael" which would be a huge spec bump, though that could be a long wait. Personally thats my big wait right now. #htctouchhd2ukusnovember9
Its the same phone for the most part. Slight cosmetic differences (I find this one more appealing personally). So it comes down to carrier, monthly price, and initial cost. Its cheaper than the hero (for now), monthly plan will cost a bit more likely (unless they have some new "droid" plans that we haven't seen), and the big one is the sprint vs VZW point. Which one is better in your area.
I guess I'm saying its a question your going to have to ask yourself. Personally I don't know why the droid isn't in there since thats what I'd probably go for. #droideris
Anyways. Yes the screen is capable of it. Yes it will undoubtedly be added by the xda devs at some point. I was actually under the impression that 2.0 had multitouch built in already but I could be wrong. #droideris
@matt.michaelson: My best guess is that it won't be fully capable of handling 2.0 well. Alternately, it may take longer for the developers to shoe-horn it in properly. This is pure speculation, of course, but I have lower expectations of 2.0 rolling out to slower or older hardware. #droideris
@met2art: HTC is working on 2.0 for the Hero. I guess there is still some question of what hero they're actually talking about (GSM CDMA) but I imagine it will work on all of them (this one included). #droideris
@jagidrok: Because it's a leaked document, rather than an official press release. Until the phone is on a stire shelf, it's technically still a rumor, albeit a fairly well-confirmed one. #droideris
@jagidrok: There is a lot of history in the Gizmodo rumor tag actually.
Sit around and I'll tell you the story of when engadget sunk apple's stock. Well actually thats the story. When the first iPhone was due to come out Engadget had gotten a hold of an internal apple memo saying that the iPhone was going to be delayed from its announced launch. Apple stock drop pretty severely on the news.
Come to find out it wasn't true. It was a fake document. Engadget took a lot of shit (there may have even been an FTC investigation, not sure) and Gizmodo started their "tag everything as rumor until official" policy.
Now to be fair Engadget had no way of knowing about the memo. A lot of other sites were calling it lack of "journalistic integrity" but the fact of the matter was that they checked everything as throughly as possible. In that case even apple had been duped since the e-mail did appear through official channels. There was some question of how long Engadget should have waited on the story (since an internal apple correction went out pretty soon after the fake email) but I always thought it was striking while the iron was hot.
Plus I've never understood how Giz's rumor tag would really prevent that. Engadget ran it with the same sort of disclaimers and it still screwed stuff up. In the mean time I've even seen Giz articles that needed redacted make some bumps in the rest of the world, rumor tag or not. Plus I think it blurs the lines between actual rumor and these "just unofficial rumors" like this. As you point out its been clear for a long time that this is the case. Nov. 6 $99. In my book its a fact. It may be a fact that later changes (there may be a delay) but for now all sources point to it being way past a "rumor". I had the same problem with the iPod touch camera that Giz kept calling "rumor" since it wasn't a "rumor" it just never launched.
Anyways. Thats why giz reinforces rumor with "rumor". Though like I said I don't think it really does all its supposed to.
@tande04: Ah, that certainly sounds like a good enough reason. But yeah, the rumor tag is kind of an afterthought for most people I imagine. #droideris
@MrBlahBlah: Don't get too excited. Rumors have floated around that it will have either Android 1.5 or 1.6. Given that this falls under HTC's Sense group, it'll probably lag a bit behind.
i think he meant that the name Touch HD wont be associated with Android. Not necessarily that they will not produce a phone with a large screen and snapdragon processor. #verizonhtcpassionhtchd2
11/05/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
I've found a lot of comments like that odd.
Not so much the waiting and re-thinking. I do that with every phone that comes out.
Why this and hero? I'd think with hero you were looking for an android device and in either case there I'd wait to see the devices that VZW is offering. You either get a better device or the same device for cheaper. If its android you're waiting for why jump to win mo? #htctouchhd2ukusnovember9
11/02/09
11/02/09
Or if you want to wait even more you could wait for "rachael" which would be a huge spec bump, though that could be a long wait. Personally thats my big wait right now. #htctouchhd2ukusnovember9
11/02/09
11/02/09
I think you'd be safe "pulling your trigger". Every rumor I've seen only has this going to T-mo USA, nothing about sprint. #htctouchhd2ukusnovember9
11/02/09
11/02/09
11/02/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
I guess I find it an odd question.
Its the same phone for the most part. Slight cosmetic differences (I find this one more appealing personally). So it comes down to carrier, monthly price, and initial cost. Its cheaper than the hero (for now), monthly plan will cost a bit more likely (unless they have some new "droid" plans that we haven't seen), and the big one is the sprint vs VZW point. Which one is better in your area.
I guess I'm saying its a question your going to have to ask yourself. Personally I don't know why the droid isn't in there since thats what I'd probably go for. #droideris
10/31/09
Good on Verizon, though. Maybe we'll see a Hero holiday sale now. #droideris
10/31/09
Powerful, inexpensive phones!? Its about time!
It will get 2.0 I'm sure, along with the Hero. HTC has announced it already plans on skipping 1.6 and going for 2.0 instead.
10/31/09
10/31/09
or is the screen, for whatever reason not capable of it? #droideris
10/31/09
10/31/09
Anyways. Yes the screen is capable of it. Yes it will undoubtedly be added by the xda devs at some point. I was actually under the impression that 2.0 had multitouch built in already but I could be wrong. #droideris
10/31/09
10/31/09
Its vzw's android line. You're not the first I've heard say that but I just don't get what is confusing about it. #droideris
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
FWIW by comparison, I know Sprint just mentioned their WM6.5 update for the Touch Pro 2 won't be out until early 2010. #droideris
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
Sit around and I'll tell you the story of when engadget sunk apple's stock. Well actually thats the story. When the first iPhone was due to come out Engadget had gotten a hold of an internal apple memo saying that the iPhone was going to be delayed from its announced launch. Apple stock drop pretty severely on the news.
Come to find out it wasn't true. It was a fake document. Engadget took a lot of shit (there may have even been an FTC investigation, not sure) and Gizmodo started their "tag everything as rumor until official" policy.
Now to be fair Engadget had no way of knowing about the memo. A lot of other sites were calling it lack of "journalistic integrity" but the fact of the matter was that they checked everything as throughly as possible. In that case even apple had been duped since the e-mail did appear through official channels. There was some question of how long Engadget should have waited on the story (since an internal apple correction went out pretty soon after the fake email) but I always thought it was striking while the iron was hot.
Plus I've never understood how Giz's rumor tag would really prevent that. Engadget ran it with the same sort of disclaimers and it still screwed stuff up. In the mean time I've even seen Giz articles that needed redacted make some bumps in the rest of the world, rumor tag or not. Plus I think it blurs the lines between actual rumor and these "just unofficial rumors" like this. As you point out its been clear for a long time that this is the case. Nov. 6 $99. In my book its a fact. It may be a fact that later changes (there may be a delay) but for now all sources point to it being way past a "rumor". I had the same problem with the iPod touch camera that Giz kept calling "rumor" since it wasn't a "rumor" it just never launched.
Anyways. Thats why giz reinforces rumor with "rumor". Though like I said I don't think it really does all its supposed to.
10/31/09
@tande04: . #droideris
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/31/09
10/29/09
10/29/09
Then again, maybe not. We'll see. #htcdroideris
10/29/09
10/29/09