The lead photo doesn't make much sense.. comparing illegal jailbroken iPhone apps to normal Android apps? Bah. We're equally screwed in the iPhone universe. Worse, actually, as at this point tethering is illegal period, regardless of carrier. Also, the iPhone App Store is carrier and country specific as well, creating an uneven experience (same goes for iPods).
I think they are showing the lack of sanctioned tethering as an inability of the devices to be able to "talk" to each other, not to make any comparisons or draw any similarities to jailbreaking and non-sanctioned tethering apps.
@strider_mt2k: Don't know. I didn't see it that way. I mean "Want to talk about it?" suggests one consoling the other, while "Shut up" and the choice of apps on screen not-so-subtly showcases what one can do and the other is bitter about.
That's just me.. and I love my (jailbroken) iPhone, but I also like to keep it fair when bashing the competition. You know, apples to apples, etc.
What is the word on the carriers? I know T-Moblie has the one with the nice screen, according to gizmodo. What other carriers do/will carry android phones?
You know, this is not so bad. It doesn't make sense in this day and age to not include a standard 3.5mm jack, but a USB adapter is a heck of a lot better than the wonky fastport on the Sony Ericsson W810i that I have. Seriously, after plugging and unplugging the big fat charger plug, eventually, the sound through the including headset/mic piece, or even just a regular fastport 3.5mm adapter can get rather wonky. At least the USB won't start fucking up like that.
@iAirmanshirk: Actually, I'm starting to see these things more and more. Really, if you're a TMo customer, this is one of the few interesting phones that they actually have if you want something with a discount (and a plan). There's really nothing in their stores other than Blackberries, maybe a low-order SE and Sidekicks.
This says it all..... "The exploit did provide more access to the the Android's core functions, some of which could be useful for app development and porting to other phones, but it also exposed a gaping vulnerability that would be immediately shut on any other Linux distribution"
So for Google it's a nice pleasant little fix, but when Apple does it it's a blow against human rights. Yeah right.
@paja: Apple is shutting out apps that it doesn't approve to protect business interests. Google isn't trying to shut out apps here, they're trying to close a massive security hole. You can still install whatever you want on your Android phone, so the loss of total root access is of minimal concern.
@paja: K, so if you want root access thats all well and good, until someone completely hak-pwns ur phone, steals all of your data and then take a loan out in ur name...
07/22/09
07/22/09
04/16/09
...alright? I could have sworn people were hating on the iphone for the same reason
04/16/09
04/02/09
If we're paying for the connection and staying within the limits of "unlimited", then who's to say what device can be connected to it and how?
It's nothing but a way to wring a few more bucks from the customer and it's unfair.
04/02/09
04/02/09
I think they are showing the lack of sanctioned tethering as an inability of the devices to be able to "talk" to each other, not to make any comparisons or draw any similarities to jailbreaking and non-sanctioned tethering apps.
Pretty sure, anyway.
04/02/09
That's just me.. and I love my (jailbroken) iPhone, but I also like to keep it fair when bashing the competition. You know, apples to apples, etc.
04/02/09
Maybe it's just my familiarity with Gizmodo's style that made me see it like I did.
03/17/09
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/20/08
11/07/08
11/07/08
I think you may have just achieved:
11/07/08
11/07/08
11/07/08
This says it all..... "The exploit did provide more access to the the Android's core functions, some of which could be useful for app development and porting to other phones, but it also exposed a gaping vulnerability that would be immediately shut on any other Linux distribution"
So for Google it's a nice pleasant little fix, but when Apple does it it's a blow against human rights. Yeah right.
11/07/08
11/07/08
Oh, wait, it was a security hole...
STFU Mactards
11/07/08
Then again... should there be vulnerabilities to begin with?
NO! Sorry mister gHacker, you'ze been suspect.
11/07/08