Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
About the whole "every download is a lost sale" ordeal, I know that if I didn't download my music then I would not be buying even a quarter of what I have. So either way you aren't going to be making money off of me unless I really enjoy the artist and want to support them. Kinda seems like a stupid point, but then again that's just me.
@Chris Cole: True, plus what about all the people that went and bought the music, only because they had access to it first at no charge. Yo could spin it so that in a way, free downloads have lead to many sales also.
@LeonBA: The music industry's greedy pricing is what led to it's downfall. People bought lost of music back when an album used to cost no more than $10. Now that you can buy a downloaded album for about $10, people are buying them again.
For many years in between, a new CD crept up to $20 for a new release. That's too much when you're marketing to teenagers with limited funds.
The music industry now says "oh, I guess people just want the convenient digital form". Well, that's wrong too. Sales didn't take off until Apple set the price standard at 99 cents a track. It's not the format. Even convenience isn't the issue, as most people i know would rather have the physical media if the price is the same and aren't too lazy to take a trip to a store for it. And ripping is automated on most computers so even idiots can load an MP3 player from a CD.
@BsideStarchild: I'm still trying to decide if a pig would really be happy if said effluent was sprinkled with bacon. It seems a tad morbid ... or at least confusing to me.
@Hello Mister Walrus: that's exactly what I thought. I don't know the acronym, but it can't be that. That's just too silly (and represents this trial perfectly).
@jakebathman: I found this on Wikipedia. It's hilarious. What noobs!!
--
In mid-October 2007, after the IFPI let the ifpi.com domain registration lapse, ownership of the ifpi.com domain was transferred to The Pirate Bay, a pro-piracy group which claimed it received the domain from an anonymous donor.[11] The group set up a Web site under the domain titled "International Federation of Pirates Interests," a replacement backronym for IFPI. Ownership of the domain was returned to the IFPI in late November, when a WIPO arbitration panel concluded that "the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the [IFPI] has rights" and that the Pirate Bay's representative "registered and [was] using the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith" and failed to adequately rebut the IFPI's contention that he "has no rights or a legitimate interest in the Disputed Domain Name."[12]
In a separate incident, on the 18th February 2009, the Swedish ifpi.se domain was hacked by The Pirate Bay sympathiser(s). This occurred on the third day of the trial of the Pirate Bay founders in Sweden. The site was replaced with a short message directed at the Prosecutor Håkan Roswall and plaintiffs ("Warner Brothers etc"). It was signed "The New Generation".
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
personally I would blame sites like: [pandora.com]
because of them I dont download anymore nor buy music. I add in my artist and it plays everything similar to it, makes life easy...for FREE.
02/25/09
For many years in between, a new CD crept up to $20 for a new release. That's too much when you're marketing to teenagers with limited funds.
The music industry now says "oh, I guess people just want the convenient digital form". Well, that's wrong too. Sales didn't take off until Apple set the price standard at 99 cents a track. It's not the format. Even convenience isn't the issue, as most people i know would rather have the physical media if the price is the same and aren't too lazy to take a trip to a store for it. And ripping is automated on most computers so even idiots can load an MP3 player from a CD.
02/25/09
Some are even aroused by it.
NB: When in OBX, go to Pigman's. It's some of the best BBQ in the nation.
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
02/25/09
--
In mid-October 2007, after the IFPI let the ifpi.com domain registration lapse, ownership of the ifpi.com domain was transferred to The Pirate Bay, a pro-piracy group which claimed it received the domain from an anonymous donor.[11] The group set up a Web site under the domain titled "International Federation of Pirates Interests," a replacement backronym for IFPI. Ownership of the domain was returned to the IFPI in late November, when a WIPO arbitration panel concluded that "the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the [IFPI] has rights" and that the Pirate Bay's representative "registered and [was] using the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith" and failed to adequately rebut the IFPI's contention that he "has no rights or a legitimate interest in the Disputed Domain Name."[12]
In a separate incident, on the 18th February 2009, the Swedish ifpi.se domain was hacked by The Pirate Bay sympathiser(s). This occurred on the third day of the trial of the Pirate Bay founders in Sweden. The site was replaced with a short message directed at the Prosecutor Håkan Roswall and plaintiffs ("Warner Brothers etc"). It was signed "The New Generation".
[en.wikipedia.org]