Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front was starred
Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front was unstarred
Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front was starred
Dr. Evil Genius has learned that MILF stands for Moro Islamic Liberation Front was unstarred
@Thee Sea: I need to watch some of these. I've always been a huge Ultraman fan (mostly because it came out the year I was born & I love Japanese rubber monsters).
@KurganG: heh, "you're wrong" would have been fine for me . I associate relatively lax male clothing standards with North Americans, the Australians and to a lesser extent the Brits, and of these I associate Americans with Gizmodo posters, so I assumed he was American. My opinion had no factual basis, however.
Edited by SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! at 12/08/09 10:00 AM
SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was starred
SewerShark: LOOK BEHIND YOU, A THREE HEADED MONKEY!!! was unstarred
@PurpleMonkeyDishwasher::Are you? I'm not. Plainly there are more Wikipedia contributors worried about / interested in Antarctica than there are about Africa. Not sure what that says about us, or Wikipedia contributors generally. But let's face it, when we think 'global warming', we think Antarctica before we think Africa, right?
@PurpleMonkeyDishwasher:: I want to see how they determine what refers to a specific country. African countries make very little sense because of how the Europeans partitioned it. Country's borders bisect cultural borders in ways that make the countries largely irrelevant. It's the individual cultures that are more important to African history and if references to these cultures do not coincide with articles of countries than that could explain some of it.
The other reason is the obvious one, there aren't a lot of computers in Africa. People are more inclined to write about their own history, their own cultures. With less people to write them African countries have to wait for other places to write their history for them in these articles.
On the other hand, Antarctica is a bit of an outlier just because of how different it is from every other continent there's a larger interest. It's largely unexplored and very alien to people of this planet. Add that to global warming and people worrying about the individual glaciers and you can see why a lot of people from a lot of different places are writing and reading articles about it.
@thatsmrpotatohead2U: That's a valid point. I'm just thinking in terms of articles. Africa/China have many more countries, cities, people, places of interest etc, than Antarctica. I'm assuming many scientific articles will refer to Antarctica but I didn't think they would outweigh articles about China and/or countries in Africa.
@PurpleMonkeyDishwasher:: I think it's got a lot to do with the demographic of your average Wikipedia contributor. I'd be interested to see the correlation between where people are from and where they write about.
I don't have evidence to prove it but I think the map is as much about the popularity (or lack of) of Wikipedia contribution in Africa as it is about access to computers and education.
What's truly staggering about Africa is the extremes it holds - from European levels of wealth and development in some parts of South Africa, to chaos in Somalia. So to see it all represented in one bland blue colour, (apart from the strange case of Burkina Faso), says more about Wikipedia than it does about Africa. Still, excellent bit of research.
This is not accurate at all. It is full of mistakes. For example look at the Dual Layer DVD, Blu-ray, DL Bluray and Flash drive of the data section are in red squares, while they should be with green ones. The 4000 photos on the microSD is also 1600 according to the number and type of blocks next to it, probably a lot other mistakes exist but I'm kinda lazy to check them all.
Good and amusing but as others point out, still room for improvement. Surely film came before the photo....and there were more before the flloppy....starting with punchcards and magnetic reels, tapes. Still, good effort though!
The constant change of units makes the chart much less informative than it could have been.
The same goes for using the same color for a minute of music, one photo (what size?) and one MB.
Plus the size of the Flash-drive compared to ... is that a CD, DVD or Blu-ray? One or two layers?
And at first glance it looks like a 2.5" 500GB HD only contains 50 GB. Same for 3.5" 2TB HD.
All because the 'headers' for these suddenly is the size of each unit/colored square, and not the to total capacity, as it is on the rest of the chart.
It's not enough to make a chart that looks nice. It has to present the information in a way that makes more sense than just listing the data.
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
What is this 'books' of which you speak?
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
Yeah, I always wanted Transformers. Still do lol.
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
The other reason is the obvious one, there aren't a lot of computers in Africa. People are more inclined to write about their own history, their own cultures. With less people to write them African countries have to wait for other places to write their history for them in these articles.
On the other hand, Antarctica is a bit of an outlier just because of how different it is from every other continent there's a larger interest. It's largely unexplored and very alien to people of this planet. Add that to global warming and people worrying about the individual glaciers and you can see why a lot of people from a lot of different places are writing and reading articles about it.
12/07/09
12/07/09
I don't have evidence to prove it but I think the map is as much about the popularity (or lack of) of Wikipedia contribution in Africa as it is about access to computers and education.
What's truly staggering about Africa is the extremes it holds - from European levels of wealth and development in some parts of South Africa, to chaos in Somalia. So to see it all represented in one bland blue colour, (apart from the strange case of Burkina Faso), says more about Wikipedia than it does about Africa. Still, excellent bit of research.
11/30/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/28/09
11/28/09
That took a lot of getting, being dial-up an' all.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/28/09
11/28/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
11/29/09
11/28/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/28/09
The same goes for using the same color for a minute of music, one photo (what size?) and one MB.
Plus the size of the Flash-drive compared to ... is that a CD, DVD or Blu-ray? One or two layers?
And at first glance it looks like a 2.5" 500GB HD only contains 50 GB. Same for 3.5" 2TB HD.
All because the 'headers' for these suddenly is the size of each unit/colored square, and not the to total capacity, as it is on the rest of the chart.
It's not enough to make a chart that looks nice. It has to present the information in a way that makes more sense than just listing the data.
11/28/09
11/28/09
Obviously, I need to clean out that closet more often.
11/28/09
11/28/09
11/28/09