4,000 patents probably translates to about 4,000,000 hours of legal counsel. As usual, the only people who benefit from this ingenuity are the lawyers...
I assume this is the nuclear missile philosophy thrown into the patent world. We need thousands of them because they have thousands of them, and if any of us ever use them, we're all fucked.
@Monty: Actually, IBM is slightly different. They get a lot of patents so they can earn a lot in licensing revenues. I believe it was also the first company to earn $1 Billion in IP licensing revenues. So IBM looks at patents sort of like blue chip stocks.
That being said, I am sure they also are known to get into litigation over their core business.
@Mpls_Mikey: They had a little known case against SCO that says they may be more than willing to litigate to protect their property. That said, I understand what you are saying. They certainly are a number of steps above the businesses that do nothing but buy patents.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
or M.A.L.
01/14/09
That being said, I am sure they also are known to get into litigation over their core business.
01/14/09