<![CDATA[Gizmodo: insurance]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: insurance]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/insurance http://gizmodo.com/tag/insurance <![CDATA[Verizon Blocks Warranty Telemarketers, Receives $50,000]]> Those lousy auto warranty robo-dialers are finally going to stop calling Verizon customers as a result of the settlement of Verizon's lawsuit against the two companies.

Auto Warranty Services and Explicit Media (Voice Solutions) had both used auto-dialers to call Verizon customers, as well as everyone else, to offer them auto warranty insurance. Verizon sued last year to stop the practice, and just received $50,000, which they will donate to charity. The main part is, of course, that Verizon customers won't be bothered by these two jackass companies anymore. [Verizon]

Between takes on the set of Law & Order SVU, Mariska Hargitay, actress, advocate and the president and founder of the Joyful Heart Foundation, accepted a $50,000 donation from Steve Zipperstein, vice president of legal & external affairs and Leigh Schachter, assistant general counsel at Verizon Wireless.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5231291&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Chicago Street Lights May Scan for Car Insurance]]> Ticketing red light runners is standard practice in many big cities, but Chicago is considering doing one better and scanning every car going by for up to date insurance.

It wouldn't matter if you ran the light or were driving conscientiously. The proposed system would exploit both existing stoplight cameras and general security cameras to scan your plate and hand it over to the InsureNet database. If InsureNet discovered that you were lacking insurance, you'd receive a $300-$500 ticket in the mail.

The system is anticipated to raise yearly earnings "well in excess" of $100 million (possibly even double that figure or more), with InsureNet taking a modest 30% for their services. Of course, all of this cash would be contingent on uninsured drivers actually paying their fines. [Chicago Sun-Times via ars technica and Getty]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5173548&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[This Is How People Break Their Cameras]]> An insurance group in the UK just released statistics data on how their customers break their cameras, almost all of which are hilarious scenarios if you try and picture it happening.

• 1/6 blame children or dogs
• 3/100 run over their camera with a car
• 3/4 drop their cameras onto a "hard surface", into water, or by falling onto it and using it to cushion their fall

More stats on people who fall over:
• 1/10 "fell over" when taking shots, "often into water."
• 9/100 fall with their camera in their pocket or in their hand

One photographer reported: 'I was taking some shots in the garden. As I changed the lens I lost my grip on the camera. I tried to cushion its fall by sticking out my foot but ended up “volleying” it across the concrete slabs and down the steps.'

[Amateur Photographer via Digital Camera Tracker]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038409&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Rumor Smashed: AT&T Not Insuring iPhones For $5 a Month]]> We knew that rumor about AT&T iPhone insurance for $5 was too good to be true, seeing as we went through the same thing back in 2007 when the iPhone was launched. AT&T's insurance company, Asurion, isn't going to cover that super expensive phone for only $5 a month, even with the $125 deductible on pricier smartphones and PDAs. Tough luck guys, but you can always get AppleCare and protect yourself from most problems on your phone not caused by you being a dumbass. [MobileWhack]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392429&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AT&T Will Insure Any Phone for $5 a Month]]> This is coming from the boards, but it's not too far out there: Starting June 2, AT&T will offer insurance on any phone for $5 a month. These kinds of plans can be sorta scammy and pointless, but the deductible for replacement is only $50. So while it doesn't make sense for an el cheapo clamshell, if you're already on your third iPhone because you're clumsier than Urkel, you might wanna take a look at it. [Pinstack via BGR]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=391630&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[All LG Prada Phones Get Free Insurance]]> Is the gigantic price tag on the LG Prada not enough to convince users that it's a "high end luxury phone"? Then how about free insurance if the phone breaks, even if it's due to the owner's stupidity?

LG's 60,000 customer policy goes into effect immediately, and will give you up to 200,000 South Korean Won if you break your phone. The bad news: 200,000 Won is only $215. The phone is $700. Try not to break your phone.

LG Offers Free Insurance for Prada Phones [Chosun]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=265768&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Asurion's Cellphone Insurance Works - Even For Idiots]]> What's with bloggers and anger management issues? First Kotaku's Crecente smashes the wall with his fist while installing Windows, now Consumerist's Popken smashes his cellphone with his fist while being retarded. Good thing the Poppers had Asurion, which took his claim even when confessed to manually smashing the phone in anger.

So yes, Ben got a new phone with just at $50 deductible and a trip down to the Verizon store. We've usually skimped on cellphone insurance—mostly because we get our phones unlocked from overseas—but how about readers? Has your Asurion experience been as good, or are you one of the victims we hear about that warns us that it's easier NOT to buy insurance and spare yourself the headache?

Cellphone Insurance Works Even If You Smash Your Cell In Retaded Anger [Consumerist]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=229025&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nuclear Strike = Dead, No Cellphone Replacement]]> Our even more jaded friends at the Consumerist received an interesting tip regarding big cellphone insurance provider Asurion's exclusion of coverage. This is direct from the policy:

L. Any Loss or damage caused by or through or in consequence, directly or indirectly, of Nuclear Hazard, meaning any weapon employing atomic fission or fusion; or nuclear reaction or radiation or radioactive contamination from any other cause; but we will pay for direct physical Loss caused by resulting fire, if the fire would be covered under this Certificate.

Great. So while my ghost is growing a third eye, it will need to write the insurance company arguing that my phone was burned in a fire after the nuclear explosion hit.

In Case Of Nuclear Attack, Your Cellphone Insurance Is Void [consumerist]


]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=210890&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gadget Insurance]]> Now that everybody can afford a cell phone, laptop and MP3 player, it seems insurance companies are taking huge hits. Tower, a New Zealand-based insurance outfit, quotes "in excess of $750,000 per annum and rising" in claims for portable electronics. And unfortunately for them, being drunk and leaving your mobile in a cab is a good enough reason to collect. Not that I'VE ever done anything like that, unless "being hopped up on ether" counts as drunk and you can call "Air Force One" a taxi.

Oh, they also suspect some people may actually just want to upgrade their stuff and be LYING about stolen or lost goods. I mean, who do they think we are? Now, um, where did I leave that damn Vaio I got for Hanukah last year...

Insurers fret over gadgets [Stuff.co.nz]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=118719&view=rss&microfeed=true